Backwards compatible with SATA-II

It's backwards compatible with SATA1, I suppose.
The real reason to insist it's backwards compatible would be that it's less than 2 TiB / 2.2TB, same old story as the 8GB limit and others.

Also, this HDD is awesome. As a system drive (with linux and the MATE desktop), good enough to not need an SSD (the OS is somewhere between a clean state XP and a typical Windows 7 in terms of "heaviness")
The Toshiba HDD can be considered, it's about the same but has better failure statistics (from Backblaze's report)
 
Back
Top