It really was a given because anything less would be a failure not worthy of launching. FSR2 is very likely to have similar issues as TSR does on content and/or rendering approaches which don't fit it's algorithm ideally. Hence why we need to look at more titles before saying things like "DLSS killer" etc. But it's YouTube crowd so...
When did they ever claim this?
That is a game specific presentation that has no bearing whatsoever on FSR 2 beside some performance numbers, your original post is a complete fabrication on your part, none of the Arkane developers or AMD deveopers claimed this.
Which is why it was posted on AMD's YouTube channel right? I wonder what the presenter talks about from 40:40.
I can't think of any scenario where it didn't horribly ghost in motion. Bright, dark, high contrast, low contrast. I really doubt it's related to art style.
Your imagination on SW development is nowhere near reality.
Is the development of FSR fixed, or there will be next iteration ?
))
I can't believe GPUs haven't dropped in price the day FSR2 was released! I mean c'mon!
Why would they do anything of that anyway? Ampere isn't massively more complex than RDNA2 despite having tensor units which allow them to sell the same h/w for ML markets. It's basically free for gamers anyway, and the pricing is influenced by apples-to-apples benchmarks more than anything else.
I agree, but people remember the RTX tax for Turning and things like FSR2 make people question the added components like Tensors which have limited use in gaming. It definitely made sense for Nvidia for their commercial products but gamers don't care.
That "RTX tax for Turing" never really existed anywhere outside of 2080Ti. Gamers should start to care because they do look like idiots more often than not these days.
Aside from quick plugin integration, which is no doubt coming to FSR 2.0 too just like it came to DLSS, how exactly is it supposed to be inferior this time? The fact it doesn't say "NVIDIA" on it doesn't count as a reason.
