Ace Combat 5 Aircraft Lineup Revealed

M

Megadrive1988

Veteran
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3133603

Boeing

F-4E ("Phantom II" fighter)
F-4G (Advanced Wild Weasel anti-radar variant)
F-4X (Experimental reconnaissance variant)
F-15C ("Eagle" fighter)
F-15E (Strike Eagle with air-to-ground capability)
F-15S/MTD (Experimental vectored-thrust "Active" variant)
F/A-18C ("Hornet" fighter-bomber)
F/A-18E (Improved Super Hornet variant)
E/A-18G ("Growler" electronic warfare variant)

BAE Systems

Tornado GR1 (British fighter-bomber)
Tornado GR4 (Upgraded version of the Tornado)
Tornado F3 (Air defense fighter)
Tornado ECR (Electronic warfare variant)
Typhoon (Advanced "Eurofighter")
JAS-39C (Swedish "Gripen" fighter)
Hawk T-1A (Two-seat trainer jet)

Lockheed Martin

F-16C ("Falcon" light fighter)
F-16C Block60 (Upgrade with more range, better radar and components)
F-16XL (Experimental delta-wing variant)
F-117A (Stealth fighter)
F/A22A ("Raptor" advanced fighter-bomber)
FB-22 (Experimental high-capacity bomber)
F-35C (Advanced "Joint Strike Fighter")

Northrop Grumman

F-5E ("Tiger II" light fighter)
F-14A ("Tomcat" naval defense fighter)
F-14B (Upgrade with improved engines)
F-14D (Upgrade with enhanced radar and electronics)
F-20A ("Tigershark" upgrade to the F-5)
YF-23A ("Black Widow" Advanced Tactical Fighter prototype)
A-6E ("Intruder" bomber)
EA-6B (Electronic warfare variant)
A-10A ("Warthog" close air support specialist)
YA-10B (Experimental upgrade with greater range)
X-29A (Experimental forward-swept-wing design)

Dassault

Mirage 2000 (French light fighter-bomber)
Mirage 2000D (Two-seat ground attack variant)
Rafale B01 (New-generation multirole fighter)
Rafale M01 (Single-seat carrier-launched variant)

Boeing

B-1B (Long-range bomber, new-school)
B-52H (Long-range bomber, old-school)
B-747 (Jumbo jet, occasionally adapted for military purposes)
X-45A (Experimental unmanned fighter)
AV-8B (Harrier VTOL fighter)
E-767 (Passenger jet turned AWACS radar aircraft)
KC-10 (In-flight refueling jet)
CH-47 (Chinook transport helicopter)
AH-64 (Apache attack helicopter)

BAE Systems

Vulcan (Experimental long-range bomber)
Nimrod 2000 (Naval reconnaissance and patrol jet)
Sea Harrier (Naval VTOL fighter)

Lockheed Martin

C-5B (Heavy transport)
AC-139 (Space launch vehicle)
SR-71 ("Blackbird" reconnaissance jet)
C-130 (Lighter transport)

Northrop Grumman

C-1A ("Trader" workhorse transport)
E-2C ("Hawkeye" AWACS aircraft)
B-2A (Stealth bomber)
Click to expand...
 
There is a 3 minute trailer on this months famitsu wave dvd. It looks pretty good, although the story seems to be incredibly cheesy (not that the story matters but anyway). And i noticed jaggies. I can rip it if you're interested.
 
Nice to see Jas39 Gripen and Blackbird. Wonder if they will have some spionage mission with the Blackbird, high alt avoiding radar(maybe even takes some photos).
I´m waiting for that rip please. ;)
 
I don't think it's yet been fully confirmed or denied whether there's online or even what forms of multi-player might exist. Which is damn odd for a title of this stature 2-3 months from release.

Don't quote me on that, though... I probably haven't read as much about it as others on here. ;) Last real flight sim I ever played was the original Falcon! Hehe.
 
That is not the complete list, (bec'se) Su/MIG are not there. What if it also features helicopter combat?? Ka-50/Mi-35/Apache etc
 
Deepak said:
That is not the complete list, (bec'se) Su/MIG are not there. What if it also features helicopter combat?? Ka-50/Mi-35/Apache etc
Click to expand...
Well most places were talking about "50 planes" and that list is up to 57 already. Just how many ARE they going to hit?
 
Curious, with all this real planes, are they planning to make them at least semi-real this time or are they still going to be carrying more weaponry then your average battleship like they did in AC4? :p
 
Fafalada said:
Curious, with all this real planes, are they planning to make them at least semi-real this time or are they still going to be carrying more weaponry then your average battleship like they did in AC4? :p
Click to expand...

This kind or realism kills the fun factor! Do we want to return to base that often?? :D
 
Jov said:
Fafalada said:
Curious, with all this real planes, are they planning to make them at least semi-real this time or are they still going to be carrying more weaponry then your average battleship like they did in AC4? :p
Click to expand...
This kind or realism kills the fun factor! Do we want to return to base that often?? :D
Click to expand...
No, but it would be nice to have multiple play modes properly set and balanced to the angles. Let the hardcore sim players and the "I just wanna dogfight!" players have fun in their own ways. ^_^
 
cthellis42 said:
Jov said:
Fafalada said:
Curious, with all this real planes, are they planning to make them at least semi-real this time or are they still going to be carrying more weaponry then your average battleship like they did in AC4? :p
Click to expand...
This kind or realism kills the fun factor! Do we want to return to base that often?? :D
Click to expand...
No, but it would be nice to have multiple play modes properly set and balanced to the angles. Let the hardcore sim players and the "I just wanna dogfight!" players have fun in their own ways. ^_^
Click to expand...

I don't disagree, the more options the better! :)
 
thanks to Wario64 for these:

562459_20040723_screen001.jpg

562459_20040723_screen002.jpg

562459_20040723_screen003.jpg

562459_20040723_screen004.jpg

562459_20040723_screen005.jpg

562459_20040723_screen006.jpg

562459_20040723_screen007.jpg

562459_20040723_screen008.jpg

562459_20040723_screen009.jpg

562459_20040723_screen010.jpg

562459_20040723_screen011.jpg

562459_20040723_screen012.jpg

562459_20040723_screen013.jpg

562459_20040723_screen014.jpg

562459_20040723_screen015.jpg

562459_20040723_screen016.jpg

562459_20040723_screen017.jpg

562459_20040723_screen018.jpg

562459_20040723_screen019.jpg

562459_20040723_screen020.jpg

562459_20040723_screen021.jpg

562459_20040723_screen022.jpg

562459_20040723_screen023.jpg

562459_20040723_screen024.jpg

562459_20040723_screen025.jpg

562459_20040723_screen026.jpg

562459_20040723_screen027.jpg

562459_20040723_screen028.jpg

562459_20040723_screen029.jpg

562459_20040723_screen030.jpg

562459_20040723_screen031.jpg


562459_20040723_screen032.jpg

562459_20040723_screen033.jpg

562459_20040723_screen034.jpg

562459_20040723_screen035.jpg

562459_20040723_screen036.jpg

562459_20040723_screen037.jpg

562459_20040723_screen038.jpg

562459_20040723_screen039.jpg

562459_20040723_screen040.jpg

562459_20040723_screen041.jpg


562459_20040723_screen042.jpg

562459_20040723_screen043.jpg

562459_20040723_screen044.jpg

562459_20040723_screen045.jpg

562459_20040723_screen046.jpg

562459_20040723_screen047.jpg

562459_20040723_screen048.jpg

562459_20040723_screen049.jpg

562459_20040723_screen050.jpg
 
Doesn't seem likely that they will be able to maintain that kind of image quality if the game is indeed online.
 
Jov said:
cthellis42 said:
No, but it would be nice to have multiple play modes properly set and balanced to the angles. Let the hardcore sim players and the "I just wanna dogfight!" players have fun in their own ways. ^_^
Click to expand...

I don't disagree, the more options the better! :)
Click to expand...
Options and playmodes can completely kill a game for me.
Gameplay is all about setting up the right kind of boundaries for the game to unfold in.
Options make it seem like the developer didn't know what they really wanted to do, and didn't care either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top