A cute Japanese 3D benchmark program
- Thread starter maskrider
- Start date
And to think I thought no one used LHA any more. 
LZH was the extention used by LHA on DOS system. Other systems (i.e. Amiga) used .LHA as the exentions.
Output from LHA
Usage: LHA <command> [/option[-+012|WDIR]] <archive[.LZH]> [DIR\] [filenames]
Output from LHA
Usage: LHA <command> [/option[-+012|WDIR]] <archive[.LZH]> [DIR\] [filenames]
Ah... I know where the problem is... there are some problem with WinRAR w.r.t Japanese file names, and there are many LZH/LHA files with Japanese file names
Back to the benchmark My computer (P3 1.0B Ghz + GF3 Ti 200) resulting in "3545 pts." (HW T&L) I think it means 35.45 fps. With SW T&L it runs slower at 22.83fps.
Back to the benchmark
My computer (P3 1.0B Ghz + GF3 Ti 200) resulting in "3545 pts." (HW T&L) I think it means 35.45 fps. With SW T&L it runs slower at 22.83fps.
There's a page of screenshots if you want to see what the demo looks like before downloading it.
http://www.heloli.com/nb/ScreenShots.htm
http://www.heloli.com/nb/ScreenShots.htm
Is that "japanese I don't know"/"2 followed by japanese"/"4 followed by japanese" drop down menu anti-aliasing? Strangely, on my AIW 8500 128MB, there is no change in performance (about 2852) with Hardware T&L with any of those sliders, though it does look anti-aliased. And Pure Hardware T&L is a hair slower (what does that mean, anyways? prevents drivers from offloading some work on to CPU for T&L tasks?) than just "Hardware T&L".
Also, CPU speed seems to matter not much at all, since I get close to the same score (21xx I think) as Nappe1, but I have a 1.377 GHz TBird (maybe it is the FSB), with software T&L.
All these tests were with many browser windows, an application, and the full host of my sys tray icon bloat running on Win ME.
EDIT: Laf, I had just switched Direct3D to permanent Antialiasing for Morrowind since I don't trust my tweaker for per-game settings until the next update...that might explain why my results were identical. I'll go back and see how it runs with that turned off. I'd say wake up and go back, but I'm in a permanent fog today, it feels like. :-/
EDIT2: I wasn't mistaken the first time, even with it clearly visible that AA is not enabled, it sticks at the same speed. I do have vsync on, but it is not locked at 30 Hz (It is 120 for that resolution). I also note that Software T&L behaves oddly, with it actually being slower instead of just "jerkier", if you follow. I also just tried VSync turned off. Weird benchmark...
Also, CPU speed seems to matter not much at all, since I get close to the same score (21xx I think) as Nappe1, but I have a 1.377 GHz TBird (maybe it is the FSB), with software T&L.
All these tests were with many browser windows, an application, and the full host of my sys tray icon bloat running on Win ME.
EDIT: Laf, I had just switched Direct3D to permanent Antialiasing for Morrowind since I don't trust my tweaker for per-game settings until the next update...that might explain why my results were identical. I'll go back and see how it runs with that turned off. I'd say wake up and go back, but I'm in a permanent fog today, it feels like. :-/
EDIT2: I wasn't mistaken the first time, even with it clearly visible that AA is not enabled, it sticks at the same speed. I do have vsync on, but it is not locked at 30 Hz (It is 120 for that resolution). I also note that Software T&L behaves oddly, with it actually being slower instead of just "jerkier", if you follow. I also just tried VSync turned off. Weird benchmark...
Matt Burris
Newcomer
P4 2.0GHz
512MB RDRAM
GF4 Ti4600 default clock, 28.90
5722 points. Is the score taken from the average FPS you get? I think my average was 57fps.
Pretty neat benchmark, it was no fun trying to figure out what button does what though.
Btw, is the girl a cel-shaded model?
512MB RDRAM
GF4 Ti4600 default clock, 28.90
5722 points. Is the score taken from the average FPS you get? I think my average was 57fps.
Pretty neat benchmark, it was no fun trying to figure out what button does what though.
Btw, is the girl a cel-shaded model?
Athlon XP 2000+ (@1700Mhz) / GF3Ti500 / NoAA:
Pure HW T&L: 5526
HW T&L: 5531
Mixed T&L: 5542
Software T&L: 5098
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PIII 910Mhz / GF4MX-440 / NoAA:
Pure HW T&L: 2233
HW T&L: 2209
Mixed T&L: 2197
Software T&L: 2177
(Note: The CPU seems to hold the card back a lot...4xFSAA leads to identical scores)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon Thunderbird 1333Mhz / Kyro2 / NoAA:
Software T&L: 3030
Pure HW T&L: 5526
HW T&L: 5531
Mixed T&L: 5542
Software T&L: 5098
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PIII 910Mhz / GF4MX-440 / NoAA:
Pure HW T&L: 2233
HW T&L: 2209
Mixed T&L: 2197
Software T&L: 2177
(Note: The CPU seems to hold the card back a lot...4xFSAA leads to identical scores)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon Thunderbird 1333Mhz / Kyro2 / NoAA:
Software T&L: 3030
Just had to try it
3dfx Voodoo 5 6000 (Single Chip Only)
Windows XP
1024x768x32 No FSAA
2023 points
3dfx Voodoo 5 6000 (Single Chip Only)
Windows XP
1024x768x32 No FSAA
2023 points
Riddle me this ?
Free AA or what ?
ran the tests about 10 times each on
NO FSAA and 2x FSAA and well..
hmm..
(to make sure i was changing both the DX and OGL FSAA selectors)
voodoo5 5500
Win98 SE
1.0A Celeron @ 1.2 Ghz
320mb PC133
1024x768x32x 0xAA - 2449
1024x768x32x 2xAA - 2447
1024x768x32x 4xAA - 1480
Free AA or what ?
ran the tests about 10 times each on
NO FSAA and 2x FSAA and well..
hmm..
(to make sure i was changing both the DX and OGL FSAA selectors)
voodoo5 5500
Win98 SE
1.0A Celeron @ 1.2 Ghz
320mb PC133
1024x768x32x 0xAA - 2449
1024x768x32x 2xAA - 2447
1024x768x32x 4xAA - 1480
