3090 has ~12-20 % more resources, no wonder it cannot distance itself more with power limit <10 % higher.
3080 is hardly overclockable. On the...
I find this tragic rather than funny. Isn't there some cartoon software that could help make games look interesting again?
No, we are talking energy efficiency.
Much higher if Nvidia's claim of 1.9x efficiency at some Turing performance level holds any water.
The SM arrangement of GA104 should be quite different then.
So many relative to what? If I count right 3090 has 27 % more ROPs and 50 % higher memory bandwidth in comparison with 2080 Ti.
Finally, got it as well.
I still haven't recieve the Watch Dogs 2. Anybody succeeded?
It is overloaded, oh Ubisoft...
It is Samsung fabs that focus on smaller low-power chips.
What? Do you want CoD to be fun?
I am not here for funny opinions.
How? It is multiple times higher than previous consoles.
Aha, that is why loading Nvidia control panel takes about same time as loading XP.
No, OP cannot get even order of 3dfx releases right.
Those were 2D chips.
The rest is just nasty.
Why do you brush off the improvement of frame times so easily? Did the DX11 path suffered from some bug?
The comparison linked was done with high...
Because without Steam it wouldn't be posted elsewhere...
Because they don't have a web...
While the lack of progress on the store features is striking, there is no excuse for Steam taking 30% cut.
Adjustable LOD in multiplayer games with competitive ambitions is a no no.
1650 Super reviews are up. With 100 watt consumption slightly edges out Radeon 5500.
Worked for me as well.
I am afraid you are projecting your desires as their intention. Battlefields cannot stand comparisons to simulators, which is what you are...
What do you even mean by this? I just recalled some of my many games of bf 1942 and laughed at the idea of accurate setting.
Thanks Davros, but I could not get over Knossos. The FreeSpace Open Installer works and isn't it pretty much the same?
Then watch how FSO refuses to start because folder mismatch and original cannot be started from Knossos anyway because of "unsupported joystick"....
Too bad it is such a convoluted mess.
Since prints of all the notebook parts I've seen end with B2, I would say they use G92b. Though it wouldn't be unfeasible to have some with G92 as...
On the other hand, one Navi chip covering narrow market segment can hardly be the explanation.
Early unavailability would make such a high end card a collectors item, potentially making speculants buying them more than regular consumers...
Killer app cannot target hardcore gamers. So it was just another game running fast enough. Plus Nvidia and Rendition were unlikely to use miniGL...
How could miniGL kill Talisman?
Where is this fetish for fully enabled chips coming from?
:runaway::runaway: Talisman, released 1998:runaway::runaway:
Nvidia has top to bottom 12_1 products. AMD only Vega.
One would think this thread will be about video games, but instead we have a showcase of classical arts- images and music. Telling.
I see it the same Pony, but this should be added: unlike Apple products, some faulty graphics chips can be salvaged in cut-down products.
True, but compared to newer GeForces (even first Maxwell) they are too far behind.
Looks to me like drivers of Kepler cards were not optimized for the game.
And even that article concludes contrary to your statement of no improvements.
Clocks are part of it. However there are other aspects, e.g. Polaris has to do with a lot smaller memory bandwidth.
We must be watching different results then. Could you for example explain how can Polaris perform at level of Hawaii?
Is proper hardware journalism going extinct like proper content creating journalism?
I am confused. Is the nature of GF deal such that die size is irrelevant? Vega is lardass just because they cannot save money?
I am quite sure it would beat even 580 in newer games.
If a console is cheap, the creator expects to make money on games. One can imagine Microsoft is working hard on securing XBO from mining.