Shhhh! "Bluesword"

Mwwaahhaha! :LOL:

Anyway, could a person (namely: me) who boycotts the inq perhaps get a brief summary of the particular inquirer lies, over-exaggerations and half-truths that are being discussed here? ;)
 
CHIP FIRM ATI said it was unaware of any plans to introduce a prototype of Direct Shader 4.0 codenamed Bluesword.

The codename is purported to relate to a design which may never become a product but is intended to provide so called "proof of concept" for future reference designs.

Followed by discussion of all the people who know nothing about it and/or deny its existance.

:LOL:

It's classic. Like denying that Guden enjoys gay monkey porn is likely to get people wondering. . .
 
Guden Oden said:
Mwwaahhaha! :LOL:

Anyway, could a person (namely: me) who boycotts the inq perhaps get a brief summary of the particular inquirer lies, over-exaggerations and half-truths that are being discussed here? ;)

I'd love to, only this makes absolutely no sense. It's one of those classic INQ articles where I finish readhing scratching my head in awe at the sheer amount of puerile.

They made a point, and then it's as if they forgot what they were talking about, failing to "report" (their job) on the subject.

Instead, I see something about another thing that could possible mean one thing, but they're not sure, and nVidia doesn't want to comment. :???:
 
The article is like this:

"We just heard that Toyota won't be building a flying car after all. It should have been proof of concept, blah blah. GM didn't want to give us any comments either".
 
Back
Top