b0bd0le said:i'm kinda suprised that no one mentioned a 6600GT... how come? is it too old?
Where?Skrying said:Slower? And I doubt its any cheaper than the X1600 Pro, and getting it with 256MB would probably raise the price a bit more too.
chavvdarrr said:Where?
At 1600x1200 with AA and AF?
Show me game-test where X1600Pro is faster than 6600GT at 1280x1024. Not 3dmark, but any game test where its faster and fps is higher than 15-20 average... They are same class.
L O Lphiloni said:
Wow, I didn't believe this at first, but after checking some benches the 6600GT is faster than I thought. It's often barely behind the 7600GS, which is rather remarkable.chavvdarrr said:Where?
At 1600x1200 with AA and AF?
Show me game-test where X1600Pro is faster than 6600GT at 1280x1024. Not 3dmark, but any game test where its faster and fps is higher than 15-20 average... They are same class.
chavvdarrr said:Where?
At 1600x1200 with AA and AF?
Show me game-test where X1600Pro is faster than 6600GT at 1280x1024. Not 3dmark, but any game test where its faster and fps is higher than 15-20 average... They are same class.
chavvdarrr said:L O L
2 X1600Pro in crossfire are indeed faster ... your point?
as for 512MB ram ... no doubt so much memory helps a lot.. I've seen enough people buying (for example) 6200 with 512Mb ram instead of recommended by me X1600 or 6600GE - "hey, it has more RAM, IT IS better card" :cries:
Farcry, with HDR and AA and AAA... OH yeah the 6600Gt cant do that.. DUH. I win.chavvdarrr said:Where?
At 1600x1200 with AA and AF?
Show me game-test where X1600Pro is faster than 6600GT at 1280x1024. Not 3dmark, but any game test where its faster and fps is higher than 15-20 average... They are same class.