Overclock the n64?

Ah dead threads and youth.

At this point, emulation seems near perfect for the system anyway.

Mario 64 would have been impossible on a CD because he N64 didn't have enough RAM. You hardly had PS1 games with big open worlds.
Click to expand...

I'd disagree with that. I thought the cart transfer speeds weren't all that fast? And there were a few psx games that did worlds as big as Mario 64, not that Mario 64's were all that special. Rather spartan, empty environments with simple textures. Plus, didn't N64 have 4MB of ram? That's enough to fit half data on the cart.
 
All I know is I never saw loading times on the N64 while on the other CD consoles I did. I'm not sure about that allowing bigger worlds though. That's a matter of CPU+GPU+RAM and not of loading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fox5 said:
I'd disagree with that. I thought the cart transfer speeds weren't all that fast?
Click to expand...

They weren't fast enough relative to system bandwidth to not have to load program files etc into RAM (the Atari 2600, by contrast, executed the program file directly off the cart), but I think they were a lot faster than a 2x CD.
 
Fox5 said:
I'd disagree with that. I thought the cart transfer speeds weren't all that fast? And there were a few psx games that did worlds as big as Mario 64, not that Mario 64's were all that special. Rather spartan, empty environments with simple textures. Plus, didn't N64 have 4MB of ram? That's enough to fit half data on the cart.
Click to expand...
Nah alot of N64 games had the liberty of constantly loading data off the cartridge almost as if it were RAM. Factor 5 were streaming level data, textures, animations, music, sound and program code on the fly for Indiana Jones.

SM64's game world plays pretty seamlessly I don't think it would be possible on CD without being redesigned. If it was so trivial we would have seen similar efforts on the other CD based consoles prior to the Dreamcast. If you look at comparable PS platform/adventure games (Crash/Spyro/Gex/Croc) they had smaller environments in comparison to similar games on N64 (Banjo/Conker/SM64), and those worlds were segmented with long load times sometimes upwards of a minute. This affected the type of gameplay in those titles they tended to be much more linear with less free roaming.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nightz said:
Nah alot of N64 games had the liberty of constantly loading data off the cartridge almost as if it were RAM. Factor 5 were streaming level data, textures, animations, music, sound and program code on the fly for Indiana Jones.

SM64's game world plays pretty seamlessly I don't think it would be possible on CD without being redesigned. If it was so trivial we would have seen similar efforts on the other CD based consoles prior to the Dreamcast. If you look at comparable PS platform/adventure games (Crash/Spyro/Gex/Croc) they had smaller environments in comparison to similar games on N64 (Banjo/Conker/SM64), and those worlds were segmented with long load times sometimes upwards of a minute. This affected the type of gameplay in those titles they tended to be much more linear with less free roaming.
Click to expand...

PSX also had way less system ram, so it's not a completely valid comparison.
How about Jumping Flash? Still level based, but that game out in 1995 and I remember it having levels that were at least within an order of magnitude of size to mario 64. (though later games beat mario 64 by a lot, but I just mean to say I don't think mario 64 was really stressing the n64's capabilities like say a banjo kazooie/tooie or conker)
 
Nightz said:
Nah alot of N64 games had the liberty of constantly loading data off the cartridge almost as if it were RAM. Factor 5 were streaming level data, textures, animations, music, sound and program code on the fly for Indiana Jones.

SM64's game world plays pretty seamlessly I don't think it would be possible on CD without being redesigned. If it was so trivial we would have seen similar efforts on the other CD based consoles prior to the Dreamcast. If you look at comparable PS platform/adventure games (Crash/Spyro/Gex/Croc) they had smaller environments in comparison to similar games on N64 (Banjo/Conker/SM64), and those worlds were segmented with long load times sometimes upwards of a minute. This affected the type of gameplay in those titles they tended to be much more linear with less free roaming.
Click to expand...

Remember Soul Reaver on the PS1? ;)

Huge seemless environments.

And lets not forget Tomb Raider

But I think Soul Reaver was a more astonishing achievement
 
Honestly I'd rather have an overclocked PS1, with interpolation :p

Oh and higher draw distance programmed into Ace Combat 2 and 3 :LOL:
 
Its been some time since I played AC3, but didnt 3 have a long draw distance?

Some of the latest Namco games on the PS1 had an outstanding draw distance for the console. Ridge Racer Type 4 come in mind. That one was mindblowing
 
Nesh said:
Remember Soul Reaver on the PS1? ;)

Huge seemless environments.
Click to expand...

They're "seamless" the way Metroid Prime's were. They hid a lot of it under transitional animations. It's quite an achievement, anyway. Anyway, the transfer speed of a 2x CD-ROM (like the Playstation had) is only 300 KB/sec, so I highly doubt the N64's ROMs were anywhere near that slow...given the much shorter load times in cross-platform games, this really isn't surprising. That's not even taking into account the access time...I read somewhere the original concept had an average .34 second access time, although that would have been lowered by the time of release. Obviously, a ROM cart would be faster.
 
Again the question is not so much transfer speed, where 300 Mb/s would be quite ok with a good compression scheme. The real issue is latency. This is where solid state memory's like ROM and Flash wins big.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW, I want to add that a couple of years ago, people did in fact overclock the N64. They were able to run PD and Goldeneye at 60fps.
 
I think he's talking about the expansion pack which added some extra ram. I believe you couldnt play some levels of PD without it. Also games like zelda required it for the whole game if I remember right.
 
jandlecack said:
What Zelda would that be? Definitely not Ocarina of Time and I doubt Majora's Mask.
Click to expand...

Majora's Mask did require the RAM expansion. Perfect Dark required the RAM expansion for one player mode, but the multiplayer maps could be played without it.
 
Nesh said:
Its been some time since I played AC3, but didnt 3 have a long draw distance?

Some of the latest Namco games on the PS1 had an outstanding draw distance for the console. Ridge Racer Type 4 come in mind. That one was mindblowing
Click to expand...

AC3's draw distance I'd put at about 5-6 km (~3.5 miles). ACs on the PS2 was 15 km at the most, and even AC6 on the 360 is no more than 30 km either. While AC6's draw distance was perfectly fine, I'd still like to see the 40 mile max or "unlimited visibility" that you see in flight sims on the PC.

And yes, R4 was badass on the PS1. Great draw distance, 30 FPS instead of 24, and great music to boot. I love that game :D
 
Oh okay, wouldn't know that about Majora's Mask, I only played it on an emulator. OoT definitely didn't need one tho ;)

What's R4?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Video Game Console Cooling - A Hot Topic (pun kind of intended).
Replies
12
Views
2K
arandomguy
A
Rys
Reopening Architecture and Products + rules and guidelines changes
3 4 5
Replies
90
Views
13K
Shifty Geezer
Shifty Geezer
N
Interview with one of the N64's system architects: Phil Gossett
Replies
4
Views
3K
milk
milk
Shortbread
Next-Generation NVMe SSD and I/O Technology [PC, PS5, XBSX|S]
105 106 107
Replies
2K
Views
189K
Karamazov
K
3
GMA3600 / SGX545 questions
Replies
1
Views
2K
386dx
3
Back
Top