AMD CDNA Discussion Thread

For revenue or for bring-up? I'm asking because, you know, Intels 10nm products have been "shipping to customers since 2017" (maybe they used a sailboat for that and had strong headwind). So, there clearly is a difference between shipping (samples for qualifications and bring-up) and shipping (for actual market introduction).

Maybe AMD just replaced SPOCK systems at ORNL with some real ones for now.
Isn't that what happened with Milan as well. Perlmutter was active before Milan was launched.
Similarly, Frontier will be active by the time CDNA2 launches if not before.
If HPE gets CDNA2 in end of 21 then they can only deliver Frontier by Q2 2022 at best if not later
There is a thread on freedesktop during discussion on HMM that HPE, AMD and partners are working with the real HW for testing HMM. So the bringup is already done by Q1, and now we have HMM already in 5.14 and ROCm 4.3 already launched with HMM.
 
Pretty sure it's actually 128/256, with some disabled for that 112/224, similar to how Arcturus was 120 active on 128
edit: even though disabling that many sounds a lot, 112 just sounds wrong after Arcturus.
 
Last edited:
So VideoCardz is saying, that AMD (compared to MI100) tripled bandwidth, quadrupled memory capacity and changed form factor to allow twice as high TDP… all that to support less CUs? :confused:
They're suggesting 110 per chiplet quite surely, not 110 total.
 
Back
Top