Only way to win is not to play *purge pile*

Status
Not open for further replies.

HLJ

Regular
Another benchamrk (first Valhalla) that ps5 is above rtx2070super, nice (meantime other "specialist" claimed it's between 1060 and 1070 lmao) Btw wasn't there bug on ps5 in this scene with frame drops and running this scene again increase fps ? (maybe dynamic resolution kick off)

Is that "win" using fixed resolution...or cheating by lowering the resolution?
 
Is that "win" using fixed resolution...or cheating by lowering the resolution?
Alex used closest possible settings but yeah pc has higher settings in this scene, still good results from ps5
 
So you call lower settings for a "win"? :LOL:

Funny...and very telling.
on closest possible settings that you can setup using game options ps5 winning over quite fast rtx2070super, no reason to be salty ;) maybe if settings would be exact same results would be different who knows but we know that ps5 gpu in on tier with 5700xt so nothing strange with this results
 
on closest possible settings that you can setup using game options ps5 winning over quite fast rtx2070super, no reason to be salty ;) maybe if settings would be exact same results would be different who knows but we know that ps5 gpu in on tier with 5700xt so nothing strange with this results

Again you go on to calling lower settings for a "win".
For that to be true or a fact...every single reviewer would need to change the way the reviewing is done.

Cannot beat the completion, lower settings on only YOUR product and call it a "win"....lol

Detached 100% from reality.
 
Again you go on to calling lower settings for a "win".
For that to be true or a fact...every single reviewer would need to change the way the reviewing is done.

Cannot beat the completion, lower settings on only YOUR product and call it a "win"....lol

Detached 100% from reality.
What again ? I wrote quite describly why I think its a win but understant if there are no exactly same settings somebody can think otherwise but lets end this discussion here and move on ;)
 
that ps5 outperforming again with similar settings rtx2070super but as Dictator said we have to keep in mind that higher settings on pc can be quite gpu demanding so not as good example as Valhalla

You cannot use both "similar settings" and "higher settings" in the same argument...it is one, not both.

The proper term would be "lower settings".

Your "logic" would dictate 720p > 4K...we are that far out in cogentive dissonance.
 
the closest possible settings you can get on pc, not some abstract 720p vs 4k comparison

Lower resolution is lower resolution.
1<2

You are just digging your cognitive dissonance hole deeper and deeper, by trying to defend your false claim of a "win".

The proper wording would have been:
"In order for the PS5 to have similar performance to a 2070S, lower settings were needed".

But you had to try and bend reality in order to defend your choice of brand.
This is why we have independent performance reviews...so people with bias making false claims can be dismissed.

You dug the hole...not me /shrug
 
Lower resolution is lower resolution.
"In order for the PS5 to have similar performance to a 2070S, lower settings were needed".
lmao, yeah that is closet to truth results interpretation ;d nope, it would be correct if performance would be same on ps5 as on 2070super not faster but I will not wasting more time on this not productive discussion, comparison is obvious but unfortunetly settings cant be match 100% on pc
 
The proper wording would have been:
"In order for the PS5 to have similar performance to a 2070S, lower settings were needed".

Hmm, maybe the more accurate wording would be:
In order for the PS5 to have approximately 21% more performance than a 2070S in this scene, lower resolution particle and alpha effects were (likely) needed.

It's a very specific comparison that gives some good context for PS5's relative performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snc
lmao, yeah that is closet to truth results interpretation ;d nope, it would be correct if performance would be same on ps5 as on 2070super not faster but I will not wasting more time on this not productive discussion, comparison is obvious but unfortunetly settings cant be match 100% on pc

Again you called it a "win", not me...I am just calling out your false claim.

Don't like it?
Stop making false claims, problem solved.
 
Hmm, maybe the more accurate wording would be:
In order for the PS5 to have approximately 21% more performance than a 2070S in this scene, lower resolution particle and alpha effects were (likely) needed.

It's a very specific comparison that gives some good context for PS5's relative performance.

Yup...next-gen consoles have last-gen PC perfomance...ish.
Simple as that.
 
that ps5 outperforming again with similar settings rtx2070super but as Dictator said we have to keep in mind that higher settings on pc can be quite gpu demanding so not as good example as Valhalla

Ok, as Dictator noted, ps5 is close to a 2070s in cod. But what is the win here then?
Its performing where DF and others expected it to be. It neither wins or looses, its performing as expected or where other titles have shown. In some it performs abit faster then 2070s, in others below that. For normak rendering that is.
DF's comparison with a 2070s for CoD seems spot on.
 
oh salty alert ;d if you wrote this sentence at the begging I would knew earlier what type of person I writing to...

You the salty one making false claims...shall I quote your original post since it seems you forgot it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top