Assassin's Creed: Valhalla
- Thread starter AzBat
- Start date
Oh Lord you’re in for a loooooong marathon of a game.
Holy crap, that looked like utter shit of game compared to Ghost of Tsushima. I expect I will be schooled in RT and what not now, but it just felt so bland and simple.
The dialogue was seriously jarring, not that Ghost was any good, but blargh. I hope they have Norwegian audio, because the english one sucked, then I can hear it badly in Norwegian instead. Although they say Dane long boats and shout danes, but who understands that language, not even danish people does that.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
I did some benchmarks on my computer (Core i7-6700K no OC w/ slightly OCed 2080 Ti @ up to 1980/7800) with various settings (in 4K resolution):
Low (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 77/26/107/57/40
Medium (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 64/25/98/47/38
High (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 53/21/90/39/30
Very High (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 50/23/86/36/28
Ultra High (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 46/20/90/33/24
I also timed "Continue" to playable at ~18 seconds @ ultra high setting, but that's probably not really comparable as it might depend on the location in game.
Low (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 77/26/107/57/40
Medium (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 64/25/98/47/38
High (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 53/21/90/39/30
Very High (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 50/23/86/36/28
Ultra High (avg/min/max/1%/0.1%): 46/20/90/33/24
I also timed "Continue" to playable at ~18 seconds @ ultra high setting, but that's probably not really comparable as it might depend on the location in game.
If performance is anything like on PC it would have to be a wildly dynamic 4k with low settings. Although i wouldn't be surprised if this is just specific to PC due to it being DX12 and developed by Ubisoft.
Unknown Soldier
Veteran
Seems like the game as a lot of bugs. More than the usual for games. Just watching the first five minutes of the below review and you can see a lot. That said, if Ubisoft can sort out the bugs, the game could be interesting to play.
Last edited:
The claim is 4k/60fps on the XSX and I've seen one video posted here which shows the framerate sticking to 60 in seemingly lightweight areas but dropping under in a dialogue cut scene. The face off on this one is going to be really interesting. I can't see them running much below ultra on the XSX.
What SSD are you using? I'm running this from a HDD so will post some load times later if I get a chance. Just for laughs.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
Interestingly, it you look at all the current gen games with unlocked framerates that people testing on Series X and PS5, so many show a solid 60fps in gameplay but dialogue and cutscenes stick out as places where the frame rate often goes south.
Everything I've seen of Valhalla looks like pretty sparse environments for the most parts, i.e. not massive towns, but there must be some demanding places. Analogous to most of the Witcher 3's world vs Novigrad.
It's dynamic res on XSX (like all others known current gen versions). I know it's around 1500p (ish) in some places.
I installed it on a 512GB Plextor M8PeG (without the heat spreader). It's old but can still do up to 2GB/s reading.
Sony need to add VRR support fast. the game will be full of tearing in PS5 version.
Last edited:
Err based on what? The PS4 versions are superior to Xbox One
There should not be so much tearing in the first place with DRS. Something clearly went wrong on all Xbox versions (because it's not the case on PS machines).
