Those input lag numbers are averages from only 10 tests which could help explain the differences.
Last edited:
Halo 5: Guardians [XO]
- Thread starter Alucardx23
- Start date
-
- Tags
- tig:halo5
what we know is that the game isn't going to be 1080p, I think, the resolution seems to be somewhere in between 720p and 1080p. If the game was 1080p they would've said it at this point.
If they're going for 60 fps they might as well go for 60 fps and not some hopeless-as-fuck 35~55 fps travesty.
900p (or preferably some anamorphic pixel equivalent) might be enough to placate the resolution junkies that MS are hoping will mouth-breathe all over their Halo 5 displaying TVs.
900p (or preferably some anamorphic pixel equivalent) might be enough to placate the resolution junkies that MS are hoping will mouth-breathe all over their Halo 5 displaying TVs.
They use Beyond3D as their inspiration for their database and made a statement on that, that's cool of them. Now one comes to understand why we have people like @AlNets drawing lines and studying screenshots so carefully.
I'm not sure if it actually has anything to do with your question, but I remember MS cut some lag (20% apparently, I remembered it as 30%) out of the wireless signal between Xbox 360 and Xbox One. Dont know/doubt if Sony changed anything between PS3 and PS4.
http://www.videogamer.com/news/xbox_one_reduces_wireless_controller_latency_by_20.html
Or of course it could be some rendering thing.
Aha, I was wondering about those shots Alstrong was posting! I assumed the first one was a Halo 4 screen but wondered where he was getting them.
I dont see the specific shot he posted on "RUL" though, although I do see some new ones.. Guess I'll have to dig through a mountain of GAF posts to find it/them.
Anyways it looks REALLY nice, I mean really just look at it for a second. But It does kind of look like Halo 4 on steroids. Which is to be expected, I'm sure they're using Halo 4 Engine as the base.
I dont see the specific shot he posted on "RUL" though, although I do see some new ones.. Guess I'll have to dig through a mountain of GAF posts to find it/them.
Anyways it looks REALLY nice, I mean really just look at it for a second. But It does kind of look like Halo 4 on steroids. Which is to be expected, I'm sure they're using Halo 4 Engine as the base.
Here is a quick 10 second google Halo 4 screenshot to compare
Man, Halo 4 was one pretty game. No wonder Journos said Halo 4 in 1080 P in the MCC collection already looks rather next gen (I own MCC and haven't even looked at it, damn Destiny).
Side by side H4 and H5 (yeah this comparison is obviously just for shits and giggles)
Man, Halo 4 was one pretty game. No wonder Journos said Halo 4 in 1080 P in the MCC collection already looks rather next gen (I own MCC and haven't even looked at it, damn Destiny).
Side by side H4 and H5 (yeah this comparison is obviously just for shits and giggles)
Last edited:
rokkerkory
Regular
I am excited for 60fps SP! I'd take that over resolution if it was LOCKED.
Here's all the RUL shots in gallery form
http://www.readyuplive.com/halo-5-guardians-assets/
Looks very nice, so much detail on Covenant now. Getting kinda hyped
http://www.readyuplive.com/halo-5-guardians-assets/
Looks very nice, so much detail on Covenant now. Getting kinda hyped
Last edited:
Yes, nice gallery.
At 60 fps, this should look really good.
I'm not sure what type of art style this is, it's not quite real, but not quite cartooney either. I guess this is a bit grittier than blizzard graphics.
The before and after beta shots are interesting to look at, improved fidelity, but the big one are the Level changes
Yeah... metal isn't "metal". It's weird.
edit: specifically talking about the UNSC weapons. I imagine the armour is some sort of... "Warhammer 40K ceramic armour or whatever".
The lighting still looks weird. Not cartoony, but it's... not "real".
Wasn't he the editor in chief at PC Gamer magazine at one time?
Anyway, The Book of Eli was pretty good.
(((interference)))
Veteran
Yup, looks like a prettier Halo 4 at this point. I guess they're not using PBR? The armor has that same plasticky sheen all Halo games have had.
And I really don't like 343i's armour designs, they look too fussy and mecha style compared to Bungie's simpler, blockier forms.
As for framerate, I think they should stick with 30 fps, use excellent quality motion blur and do whatever Criterion did on NFS:HP to get a 83 ms response rate - that's only 17 ms worse than running at 60 fps. The motion blur will mask judder and you'd hardly notice the difference in response rate - hell with the amount of good frame interpolation options on TVs these days you'd just get your set to up convert it to 100hz or 200hz.
And I really don't like 343i's armour designs, they look too fussy and mecha style compared to Bungie's simpler, blockier forms.
As for framerate, I think they should stick with 30 fps, use excellent quality motion blur and do whatever Criterion did on NFS:HP to get a 83 ms response rate - that's only 17 ms worse than running at 60 fps. The motion blur will mask judder and you'd hardly notice the difference in response rate - hell with the amount of good frame interpolation options on TVs these days you'd just get your set to up convert it to 100hz or 200hz.
Not the best example.
I have that game and it screams 30 fps everywhere, the framerate was jumpy and extremely twitchy when I played it back in the day and the blur is Horrible in that game,
everything looks like covered in Vaseline and blurry, but maybe that was the AA method, probably FXAA.I stopped playing because I felt confused, I couldn't see detours as easily as I could, and I couldnt see neither feel anything in that game, the IQ was horrible.
I was playing Forza 4 those days, which was an exclusive game, and despite running at 60 fps, the textures were like 10 times crisper. Criterion sucks bad.
Playing Forza 4 intensively those days didn't help NFS at all, gotta admit, if I played it in isolation I wouldn't mind how bad that game is as much.
I criticised the game a lot because of that -it's in the NFS thread, not making up anything-, but it looked blurry beyond belief and I blamed the PS3 because Criterion went for absolute parity and I was used to the look of X360 games which usually looked crisper, textures wise, specially.
Digital Foundry praised the game a lot, I coulndt believe it.
I was so disappoint because the original NFS 3: Hot Pursuit is one of my favourite games ever.
I also have the NFS game released at Xbox One launch date. 1080p, 30 fps. Horrible again.... Blur everywhere, confusing..., EA shiny shiny stuff...
Last edited:
Some of the shots (the actual game ones) seem to have a cel-shade tone to them. Nothing like Crackdown... but more subdued and less off-putting.
I have to agree. These shots look good...
rokkerkory
Regular
Yeah a Halo 4 ++ to me plus 60fps is awesome. Very happy. Things look very detailed and with open bigger environments / battles that's just ace.
Can't wait, 2 more days!
Similar threads
- Locked
