Intel ULP SoCs

Couldn't it just be the name for their Form Factor Reference Design (FFRD)? It is named the Intel Harris Beach FFRD after all.
 
I think we need a generic thread for Intel SoCs.

Has anyone any idea what Intel Harris Beach stands for?

http://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx27&os=Android&api=gl&D=Intel Harris Beach FFRD

It's categorized under Intel Unified 3D under GPUs just as Baytrail; a higher clocked Baytrail variant then or something else?

I saw mention, a few months back of Harris Beach Haswell Ultrabooks, perhaps this a low TDP Haswell part?

http://nakedalm.com/unboxing-the-intel-haswell-harris-beach-sds-ultrabook/

I wonder how mature / stable the GL drivers are on the device that popped up at GFXbench, the low levels scores would lead you to expect much higher T-Rex and Egypt HD results.
 
I saw mention, a few months back of Harris Beach Haswell Ultrabooks, perhaps this a low TDP Haswell part?

http://nakedalm.com/unboxing-the-intel-haswell-harris-beach-sds-ultrabook/

I wonder how mature / stable the GL drivers are on the device that popped up at GFXbench, the low levels scores would lead you to expect much higher T-Rex and Egypt HD results.

Well one offer that caught my interest at CES was this one here: http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2014/01/06/lenovo-miix-2-review-first-look/

In tablet only mode it weights about 1.5x as the Asus Transformer T100 but I'd tolerate it for the performance benefit.
 
Better than expected, I guess? Although at higher power consumption...
better than expected?
Its scores worse than my phone (in all the tests I looked at) and its a tablet!

I guess[strike] (2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)[/strike] 2015 will be the year intel destroys ARM
 
better than expected?
Its scores worse than my phone (in all the tests I looked at) and its a tablet!

I guess[strike] (2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)[/strike] 2015 will be the year intel destroys ARM

Well the above "poke" would make half way sense if the GFXbench3.0 results above would have anything to do with CPU relative measurements. It being a pure GPU benchmark and on top of it Manhattan being quite GPU ALU bound, I'm not sure where you're trying to get at.
 
So what does this mean?
;) what are you talking about?

I am only talking all this time about GFXbench3.0 (and 2.7 = T-Rex) results. It's a GPU benchmark.

Yes and? Tell me what else is new with marketing crap from any other side. Intel's upcoming Moorestown (smartphones) will also be by a magnitude faster than that Baytrail variant in terms of GPU performance, which is also somewhat apples to oranges when you compare a DX11.x against a DX10 GPU design.
 
Oh thats good to know, so 2014 is the year intel shows those upstarts ARM who's the boss
Tell me is 2014 also the year that linux conquers the desktop? :)
 
Oh thats good to know, so 2014 is the year intel shows those upstarts ARM who's the boss
Tell me is 2014 also the year that linux conquers the desktop? :)

I'm anything but for Intel for the ULP market, but if you haven't an answer with some technical merit in store I don't think I'll further contribute to your rants.
 
according to GLbench

http://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx30&os=Android&api=gl&D=Tesco+Hudl+2&testgroup=info

Intel has won the socket for the HUDL2, with a Baytrail soc.

Won't mean anything for folks outside the UK, but this is the own-name brand for a tablet by leading UK supermarket, Tesco, and has a reasonably high profile. The current gen HUDL, launched in Sept 2013, sells for £119, and uses a Rockchip 3188 (quad-core 1,5ghz, Mali graphics).

Decent win for Intel.
 
Back
Top