Business Approach Comparison Sony PS4 and Microsoft Xbox

Having an extra $100 in your pocket doesn't necessarily mean you'll spend it on games. There's a number of factors that will affect attach rates and if the hardware is profitable install base works fine for making money and selling services.
 
the way I see it going down for me .


htpc into xbox one into av reciver into tv.

vs currently

htpc to av receiver

xbox 360 to av receiver

bluray player to av receiver.



Way it works now

I get a call or text message to get on live to play a game. So I stop my tv show and change input on my receiver power on the xbox and then put the disc I want to play into my xbox and wait for it to load and get in game.


Way it will work in the future. I'm watching tv and get a pop up saying my gf invited me to a game , accept it and game loads up and boom i'm playing.


I will take the second option every day I use my 360 over my htpc for Netflix and hulu because of this . Adding live tv and bluray is nice (though I only own like 15 blurays and they are mostly disney animation)

This is what I think most people will think is awesome. The ability to still get game invites, friend online notices, text/voice messages, friend beacons, etc & have them overlay on top of whatever you have connected to your HDMI Input. You're never more than a click of your controller or a Kinect voice command to getting back to the action. No need for an additional universal remote. And even if you did have an awesome universal remote & receiver, you would have to keep switching back & forth between devices looking for those notices. This will be absolutely crucial for the new time-sensitive challenges that are coming. Imagine watching a TV show or live sports event & during a commercial you receive a video taunt where your buddy completed an awesome achievement or challenge. You can even then pause your show & call him via Skype to work out a multiplayer session. I know some of you guys with tablets & smartphones are not impressed, but in my house we don't have either. We just have a couple of old cheap laptops. This feature will save us a bunch from not needing those.

Tommy McClain
 
For anyone that has followed digital distribution will know that its not news. Steam and Origin instigated the same policy a while back. [edit] Apparently MS and Sony added the policy some time ago, so its not new for Xbox One.
 
To be honest, I don't really care much about the waiver, I'm just curious why it would be legally binding given that you cannot take away people's right to sue (individually only?), not to mention unfairness of the arbitration.

This is the same thing cell-phone companies have used for quite some time now -- service contracts that include a no class-action-lawsuit clause. This is just one field catching up with all the others.
 
Ya, And in keeping with the business comparison nature of the thread, PSN added a class action waiver 2 years ago.
 
This is the same thing cell-phone companies have used for quite some time now -- service contracts that include a no class-action-lawsuit clause. This is just one field catching up with all the others.

Is it really legally binding though? EULAs have all kinds of bs which don't hold up in court.
 
BTW, when I buy a console from a store or Amazon, I don't sign or agree on anything.
If you buy the hardware, don't plug it in to the net and use it as a BRD player then sure. However, the MS page is just making it clear that to get full use of the system in its intended manner you will need a Live account that Live account will come with that waiver.
 
Apple TV is reasonable for netflix, but the inconsistent "move to the next episode" stuff irritates me a lot. Sometimes when I hit "menu" after watching a show it automatically moves to the next episode, but mostly it doesn't, leaving me having to guess sometimes which episode I just watched.

The 360's implementation is just flawless in this area. Not only does it move to the next episode, it will automatically play it unless you don't want it to. I love that. If the 360's implementation was faster to load, didn't ask me about adult or kid netflix every time, got rid of the ANNOYING attempt to stop you exiting it, and was easier to get to with a remote control ("Wife acceptance factor"), we'd never use the apple tv for netflix.

I find that the NORMAL speed of EVERYTHING AppleTV is the COMPLAINED about speed of 360 Netflix (and I am DEFINITELY a 360 Netflix complainer, I think it was 2010 that was lightning fast before Netflix regressed). Because I use my AppleTV most just for AirPlay when I do actually want to use it for video I get PS3 firmware update flashbacks where 2 times outta 3 theres a firmware update UNLIKE the PS3 whose updates always installed first-time for whatever reason the damn update fails every.single.time. first it was because the AppleTV had known issues updating firmware over eth but NOW it won't update over wi-fi...

We use voice for navigating Netflix and Video Marketplace. Using voice controls is much faster in Netflix than XVM because of the organization layouts but I much prefer being in Video Marketplace than Netflix now. MSFT needs to work on fuzzy logic for Bing search such that when I go searching for Robin Hood for example...Amazon has Season 1 listed and Netflix Season1 (or something like that) and BBC America Series 1, it needs to group as it does when a show is listed "properly" by multiple providers.

Your old crew should have just hired me on the entertainment side...I've been using it since the damn thing rolled out and the original Video Player before then (and complaining about it since 05/06)! I remember when the right stick was actually for transport controls. On the plus side it looks like if you go back to our interaction just after Kinect v1 beta that almost everything I asked for from a hardware and OS perspective is now in v2 though I'd need to see the OS with multiple people + kid with parental controls enabled and what gets presented to the end-users since my post was really about parental controls. As an aside, I hope SONY comes up with something better than what I was frustrated by in 08/09 with their parental controls...ugh...if I recall it was something like 0-9 and I was like WTF is this shit...where are the ESRB/MPAA/TV ratings?!? Actually when it comes to SONY my hope is always that the firmware/OS is NOT coded in Japan...
 
You could play a turn based game during commercials of the game you're watching, or check the online guide for a spot you're having trouble with in a game. There's countless scenarios where switching will be a nice convenience.

And you really think you'll be using the browser on your TV screen to do that, rather than just picking up your tablet which 1.) is a lot more convinient 2.) therefore quicker 3.) sharper and better readable, because you have it in your hands, rather than trying to read something from a fullhd TV screen at a distance?

...then on top of it, use your gamepad to use the on-screen keyboard, because "Xbox One, open Google, search for "online tutorial of Halo 4", Xbox One scroll down, scroll down, scroll down, no, scroll up, scroll up, yeah, open link... - *fuck it isn't numbered*, errr, (uses gamepad), opens link, realizes it's too small to read because it's one of those sites that isn't even optimized for mobile sites, much less a TV screen and a controller, play around with zoom controls etc...........

:rolleyes:

To me it sounds like people are trying to make up reasons to like a feature that just isn't that practical. Perhaps if you still live in the stone-ages and never heard of tablets and still use a Nokia 3310 with monochrome display, then yes, the Xbox One (or any browser running on a TV set) is like... the most exciting feature, ever!
 
This is what I think most people will think is awesome. The ability to still get game invites, friend online notices, text/voice messages, friend beacons, etc & have them overlay on top of whatever you have connected to your HDMI Input. You're never more than a click of your controller or a Kinect voice command to getting back to the action. No need for an additional universal remote. And even if you did have an awesome universal remote & receiver, you would have to keep switching back & forth between devices looking for those notices. This will be absolutely crucial for the new time-sensitive challenges that are coming. Imagine watching a TV show or live sports event & during a commercial you receive a video taunt where your buddy completed an awesome achievement or challenge. You can even then pause your show & call him via Skype to work out a multiplayer session. I know some of you guys with tablets & smartphones are not impressed, but in my house we don't have either. We just have a couple of old cheap laptops. This feature will save us a bunch from not needing those.

Tommy McClain

Doesn't Windows Messenger or something let you tie into your XBL and you can chat and get notifications through that?

I think as popular as mobile devices are, they will be interested in integrating so you should be able to communicate with your friends list when your console isn't on or when you're not necessarily in the living room.

But since MS also owns Windows, why wouldn't they have similar integration for your laptops?
 
Sony: PlayStation business needs to be profitable this year
By Matt Martin

WED 12 JUN 2013 10:49PM GMT / 6:49PM EDT / 3:49PM PDT
BUSINESSPUBLISHING

Will PS4 hardware be profitable on day one? It's a bigger issue than that, says Sony's UK MD Fergal Gara

Sony Computer Entertainment
Sony Computer Entertainment is a Japanese videogame company specialising in a variety of areas in the...

playstation.com

Sony has emphasised that the PlayStation division has to be profitable this financial year, as it prepares to launch a major new console before the end of December.

This week it unveiled the retail price for the PlayStation 4, and confirmed that the home console will definitely be released in the US and Europe for Christmas holidays - although the company can't commit to month or date.

"Quite simply we don't want to over promise and under deliver," Gara told GamesIndustry International. "We're not in mass manufacture right now so it's impossible to be absolutely precise. I'm confident we'll have very significant stocks for the UK and absolutely delighted we're going to launch before Christmas. "

Consumers and press have reacted favourably to the price of the system, which will retail for $399 in the US and £349 in the UK. But some are questioning those figures and whether the company will take a loss on sales of the hardware at launch.

"There's no point in looking at the console in isolation," Gara said. "Is PlayStation going to be a profitable business? It needs to be and it intends to be a profitable business over the next year.

"The balance of everything we do, whether that's the console, the software, the accessories or the digital business, it all needs to be profitable and we expect it to be profitable in the short term and the medium term."

Last year Sony's PlayStation business recorded a slide in sales of more than 12 per cent, with profits dropping from $310 million to $18 million. The company warned in May that it had reduced expected profit margins from 8 per cent to 2 per cent.

This week rival console manufacturer Microsoft revealed that its new Xbox One console would retail for $499, putting it at a price disadvantage with Sony. But Gara explained that Sony had a $399 price in mind at the beginning of development for the system, after the company launched the PlayStation 3 at $499 and $599 to much criticism and slow initial sales.

"The reference point was PlayStation 3," he said. "It wasn't the competition because up until very late we had no idea what their price was going to be. Getting to a price point doesn't happen in the final days and weeks, it happens years in advance as you plan for a target price point alongside your engineering, design and architecture of the system.

"You have to hit that combination of price and performance in power. I'm delighted in the horsepower per pound that we've delivered, it genuinely is one very high powered machine. It's uncompromisingly built for one purpose above all other. Gaming, and performance around gaming, is front and centre. It's been a considered effort for seven years, not a knee jerk decision in the last days and weeks.

It's not just on price where Sony is winning in a new round of console wars. Microsoft is under fire for a number of online and sales initiatives that consumers feel are unfair and exploitative.

Sony used its pre-E3 conference this week to directly attack Microsoft, raising the roof from a supportive crowd and playing to an online community hungry for conflict.

"Of course there was a little bit of play to the audience with the script and underlining the points of difference that we knew would be loved," admits Gara. "We chose to do that, who wouldn't? It's a competitive market." But he also makes it clear that there was never any other intention for Sony to copy Microsoft's unpopular stance on used games or it's insistence of an online connection "We knew what our message was, we'd decided on that some time ago. There were some small adjustments and refinements going on closer to the time but the fact is the message we have has gone down very well."

But it's still early days for both console manufacturers, and there's time for both to either claw back public support or slip up in the months ahead.

One contentious issue may be the price of games. While smaller indie and downloadable titles can sell for reasonable prices, blockbuster games such as The Last of Us and Uncharted command high retail prices. When asked if there's the possibility that triple-A games may rise further to help cover the cost of increasingly expensive development, Gara was more vague.

"We haven't announced our pricing yet, we're still looking at it. We'll make our minds up to as exactly where that will sit. Expect premium games to carry a fairly premium price tag. But expect a lot more in between. We'll have the full breadth of games both in terms of content and price," he said.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...ion-business-needs-to-be-profitable-this-year
 
And you really think you'll be using the browser on your TV screen to do that, rather than just picking up your tablet which 1.) is a lot more convinient 2.) therefore quicker 3.) sharper and better readable, because you have it in your hands, rather than trying to read something from a fullhd TV screen at a distance?

...then on top of it, use your gamepad to use the on-screen keyboard, because "Xbox One, open Google, search for "online tutorial of Halo 4", Xbox One scroll down, scroll down, scroll down, no, scroll up, scroll up, yeah, open link... - *fuck it isn't numbered*, errr, (uses gamepad), opens link, realizes it's too small to read because it's one of those sites that isn't even optimized for mobile sites, much less a TV screen and a controller, play around with zoom controls etc...........

:rolleyes:

To me it sounds like people are trying to make up reasons to like a feature that just isn't that practical. Perhaps if you still live in the stone-ages and never heard of tablets and still use a Nokia 3310 with monochrome display, then yes, the Xbox One (or any browser running on a TV set) is like... the most exciting feature, ever!
I'm guessing kinect will have improved enough to be useful there, and you can use all of those inputs at once to make the process as swift as possible.

Or I could drop all of what I'm doing and pick up another device to look something up.
 
I'm guessing kinect will have improved enough to be useful there, and you can use all of those inputs at once to make the process as swift as possible.

Or I could drop all of what I'm doing and pick up another device to look something up.

I would be really interested to hear how...

Imagine yourself standing behind someone sitting at a keyboard and then giving that (intelligent) person commands to follow to end up seeing what you want to see on screen. Now, imagine that 10 times less accurate because Kinect, unlike that person who probably knows your intentions (has an understanding of the context) when you give him/her a command to follow, would be doing that with a complex software that needs to analyze what you say and put that into letters and commands while at the same time intepretating that to do what you the user want it to do. Imagine trying to get your kinect/console to search for something simple only to find it miss-spelled/miss-interpretated something and then trying to command it, only through voice, that it should correct the miss-spellings and/or delete the word etc.

The point is, Microsoft never showed exactly how well it works, yet it seems everyone is happy to assume a 'perfect world' / ideal circumstance scenario. This is not 'new' tech, it's been around and has again and again shown to have flaws. Add to that, that the internet isn't made for voice controlling software - websites are predominently designed around PC centric behaviour with browsing using a keyboard and mouse - and only since the take-off of mobile devices have we seen more and more sites optimized for the smaller screens and touch-screen displays. That still mandates some use with your finger where you can point, scroll and navigate. If you are limited to your voice, the most basic task of entering a search string into a search engine and browsing through the results can be a very tiring process to the point that no one will dare use it.

In fact, I'm willing to bet that after some initial experimenting with the new toy, most people will be adept to just use the controller because experience will tell them that while kinect + voice *can* work in some few instances well, using the existing methods of input is far easier and has a much higher success rate most of the time.

And if this doesn't convince you - Think about more complex scenarios where you have a site with multiple inputboxes. Just by using voice, how are you going to communicate to the Xbox which inputbox it should tag to enter something? Are you going to use coordinates? (and for the case you do figure out some way on how it could work, it's still just speculation since we have absolutely no idea if the real Xbox will actually go through these lengths to implement it - something I find highly doubtful because these things are extremely complex to get to a point that it just works like they usually do in science-fiction movies.)

Chances are, if you're already holding the controller anyway (because you just switched from a game), it's far easier to just keep using that, than start using your voice. And browsing the internet with a gamepad, is not very ideal as past experiences have shown. It might have been a great "killer" feature back in 2005/2006, but since then, we got smartphones and tablets that do these tasks much more efficiently, easier and more convinient - and at a price, that everyone can afford one.

At the end, you'll end up with a box with plenty of features, but many that probably won't get used over time. Lots of potential, but in reality, not very practical.


The most biggest advantage I see is being able to use Windows 8 apps and Skype on your Xbox - but even that is still an unknown to what the limits are. Skype is perhaps something that would work well on a television set, but it's also something that works quite well on any modern tablet or even smartphone.
 
And you really think you'll be using the browser on your TV screen to do that, rather than just picking up your tablet which 1.) is a lot more convinient 2.) therefore quicker 3.) sharper and better readable, because you have it in your hands, rather than trying to read something from a fullhd TV screen at a distance?

...then on top of it, use your gamepad to use the on-screen keyboard, because "Xbox One, open Google, search for "online tutorial of Halo 4", Xbox One scroll down, scroll down, scroll down, no, scroll up, scroll up, yeah, open link... - *fuck it isn't numbered*, errr, (uses gamepad), opens link, realizes it's too small to read because it's one of those sites that isn't even optimized for mobile sites, much less a TV screen and a controller, play around with zoom controls etc...........

:rolleyes:

To me it sounds like people are trying to make up reasons to like a feature that just isn't that practical. Perhaps if you still live in the stone-ages and never heard of tablets and still use a Nokia 3310 with monochrome display, then yes, the Xbox One (or any browser running on a TV set) is like... the most exciting feature, ever!

I completely agree with your points.
These media features would seem to me to be only of use for single people.
I shudder to think what would happen if my wife was watching an interesting documentary and I suddenly bring up a skype window and start talking over her program, or shrink her screen down and start searching the internet. I think she'd be annoyed and quite rightly, it's a rude and inconsiderate thing to do. Tablets allow you to carry out all these tasks without disturbing anybody else.
 
Back
Top