Viewing angles of Wii Us GamePad looks like an IPS/VA-panel: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-11-19-nintendo-wii-u-gamepad-viewing-angles-gallery
Wii U hardware discussion and investigation *rename
- Thread starter AlNom
- Start date
- Status
The build quality is definitely better than those Chinese tablets but Nintendo tend to use cheap internal components for their units. So I have no doubt things like the front facing camera, accelerometers and gyros will be in the ball park of cheap devices. Even the LCD screen isn't exactly cutting edge compared to average Android tablets.
I am skeptical too, though I don't think that when Nintendo speak of loosing money they speak of the BOM alone.
And I agree with SargonHamurabi, the performance are kind of unacceptable imo for a design that comes 7 year later than the 360 (even though both the 360 and the ps3 were getting closer to power wall). At least the Wii was more powerful than the gamecube that was in the same ballpark as the xbox/ps2 / the console of the same generation.
I read the DF article about the WiiU, the comparison they make with their 300 Pounds PC, is not flattering to say the least. Nothing unexpected, sadly.
Well I would not push that far but sticking to 720p there should be neat and visible improvements in IQ across the board (from texture quality, to texture filtering, shadows, lightning, some form of anti aliasing, etc.).
Last edited by a moderator:
Wii had an ARM CPU called "Starlet" that worked as a sort of middle man for security, I/O and for the standby mode operation. Actually it was one of the major differentiators between Wii and Cube.
The DSP may be related to backwards compatibility since Wiicube used one for audio processing.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
Where have you seen dual-core?
An ARM CPU in the northbridge/GPU would be kind of predictable because there was one already in the Wii, but I haven't seen anything about it being dual-core.
That would mean an even smaller/weaker GPU.
How is the gamepad "much" more complex? See the ifixit teardown for youself. There's no SoC, no RAM and a measly 32MB of cheapo local storage.
The only "advanced" part that may go in there is the dual-channel broadcom Wireless-N module that #may# be working at 5GHz to ensure better connection with the console. The rest is just a bunch of hardware decoders and call it a day.
How is that "much" more complex? How is it more complex at all?
Oh, ok. Good points.
Wow, that's a big conclusion to jump to isn't it? We know nothing about the ARM chip to make a call about its power draw, impact on other hardware etc. We also know nothing about the GPU to start with so what are we basing this assumption on?
Dual core I must admit was just from blu's tech thread on gaf. The way everyone was chatting about it I figured it was confirmed...
SargonHamurabi
Newcomer
Wait wait wait, in the previously posted tear-down there are 4 separate DDR3-1600 chips (each one 512MB) on the board. Would it be that each of them have a bandwith of 12.8 GB/s individually and so there is a total bandwith of 50.4 GB/s for the RAM, or would it just flatly be 12.8 GB/s?
If it's the first case, then I can see why the ports still came out the way they did. They were not developed to access the RAM in such a fashion, so the de-facto bandwith was very low.
If it's the first case, then I can see why the ports still came out the way they did. They were not developed to access the RAM in such a fashion, so the de-facto bandwith was very low.
Are you suggesting each Ram chip has it's own data bus?
DuckThor Evil
Legend
No offense, but don't you think that if there was even a slight chance of what you are describing here to be true, that it would have already been pointed out.
12.8 GB/s is the total.
NFC
Camera
Gyro
Accelerometer
Magnetometer
Microphone
Bunch of DSPs
IR send/receive
Dual analogs
Nintendo QA
Well, its better than only having 32MBs of eDRAM as memory for the whole system...
Not a whole lot, and it will be difficult to fully gauge until we know the bandwidth figures for the edram in the GPU. If we're talking a staggeringly high bandwidth then it will mitigate the low main memory bandwidth better than having edram with low bandwidth. 12.8 GB/s is really slow for a new system coming out and really will make it hard on developers at first (as can be evidenced) to get games up to parity with PS360. There's practically zero advantages of having 12.8 GB/s, with 2 GB memory, when your direct competition has a higher level of bandwidth. The edram here is basically the wildcard in terms of determining just how Wii U is memory wise. It could be devs who did magic with the PS2 can repeat that with Wii U.
I do hope we learn more about the edram and how it all fits in with the GPU in the near future.
Each of the DRAMs is specified as having 16-bit I/O, hence 64-bit bus total.
(((interference)))
Veteran
Actually, it really seems like they're incompetent since the 'selling below cost' claim only takes into account manufacturing costs:
http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/121025/04.html
Even DF find it incredulous that Nintendo is managing to make a loss on the hardware at $300.
I have no doubt it took some creative accounting to make such a self serving statement in the face of so much criticism about the price.
- Status
