shadermark 2.0 tomorrow!
- Thread starter tEd
- Start date
vrecan said:
Anti-Detect-Mode works on both vertex and pixel shaders. How it works:
first version:
-insert NOP instruction
PRO's: worked on r3xx vpu's
CON's: errors on NV3x vpu's
second version:
- insert/double instructions which don't do any harm to the shader result
PRO's: worked on all vpu's
CON's: more instructions, slower shaders and/or going beyond shader instruction limit
third version(used in ShaderMark v2.0):
- shuffle some instructions on a random base, which have no needed order for execution
- shuffle R register's, like r1 to r3 on a random base
PRO's: worked on all vpu's
CON's: may be easy to detect by driver coders
So the ADM will be modified in future versions/updates of ShaderMark v2.0 in order to have some impact. It's a race....
Regards,
Thomas
xtreme2k said:Natoma said:
Yep that thats sorted its the memory size issue.
So again I ask. Is this a portent of things to come wrt HDR perf in HL2? A 25% gain in performance going from a 128MB R350 to a 256MB R350 is nothing to sneeze at in a game where you're averaging 60fps with no AA/AF with a P42.8C.
Especially when I want to run 4xAA and 16xAF.
OpenGL guy
Veteran
That should only be true for the OpenGL control panel.tb said:just checked my settings, fresh installed catalyst drivers always set the quality one notch bellow maximum
Mintmaster
Veteran
ballero, did you run the test with partial precision? It doesn't look like it, because your numbers match tEd's "Partial Precision ON" results, except for tests 7 and 12.
NOTE: These are full precision results. 51.75 and 52.1 are from tEd, 45.33 from ballero, 9800 Pro from xtreme2k.
It looks like the 51.75 only improved test 7, while slowing down test 12. 52.1, on the other hand, has improvements across the board. Still very far from the 9800 PRO's speeds, at least in full precision.
Code:
Test 45.33 51.75 52.1 9800PRO (3.7)
2 105 101 133 232
3 72 70 85 160
4 163
5 61 57 73 130
6 76 71 82 170
7 65 118 143 148
8 127
9 29 27 39 116
10 132 130 163 238
11 116 113 132 206
12 58 49 69 139
13 35 34 40 87
14 40 38 53 87
15 53 52 52 125
16 40 76
17 5 5 6 13
18 23 21 30 105
19 27
20 47
21 50
22 36
23 52NOTE: These are full precision results. 51.75 and 52.1 are from tEd, 45.33 from ballero, 9800 Pro from xtreme2k.
It looks like the 51.75 only improved test 7, while slowing down test 12. 52.1, on the other hand, has improvements across the board. Still very far from the 9800 PRO's speeds, at least in full precision.
OpenGL guy said:That should only be true for the OpenGL control panel.tb said:just checked my settings, fresh installed catalyst drivers always set the quality one notch bellow maximum
btw why is that so? why don't they just set it to max quality as default like in d3d?
Myrmecophagavir
Newcomer
They do, for the latest driver at least - are you using an older one?tEd said:btw why is that so? why don't they just set it to max quality as default like in d3d?OpenGL guy said:That should only be true for the OpenGL control panel.tb said:just checked my settings, fresh installed catalyst drivers always set the quality one notch bellow maximum
Using 45.33 Drivers (Anti-detect On then Off)... I'm not sure how to enable _PP; I get a message stating I cannot do this with the free version. Oh well.
Code:
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 56623104
HAL (pure hw vp): NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra (Anti-Detect-Mode: off, gamma correction: DAC)
options
pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1
results:
shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 101 fps 9.9087 mspf 505 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 70 fps 14.2913 mspf 350 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 57 fps 17.6607 mspf 284 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 71 fps 14.1230 mspf 355 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 60 fps 16.6437 mspf 301 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 26 fps 38.3021 mspf 131 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 130 fps 7.6747 mspf 652 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 113 fps 8.8496 mspf 565 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 50 fps 20.1928 mspf 248 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 34 fps 29.5858 mspf 169 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 38 fps 26.4083 mspf 190 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 52 fps 19.0485 mspf 263 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 5 fps 209.0658 mspf 24 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 21 fps 46.8020 mspf 107 rendered frames
_____________________________________________________________
video mode / device info
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 56623104
HAL (pure hw vp): NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra (Anti-Detect-Mode: on, gamma correction: DAC)
options
pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1
results:
shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 101 fps 9.9049 mspf 505 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 69 fps 14.5406 mspf 344 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 56 fps 17.8144 mspf 281 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 71 fps 14.1408 mspf 354 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 60 fps 16.6373 mspf 301 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 26 fps 38.7019 mspf 130 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 130 fps 7.6777 mspf 652 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 113 fps 8.8496 mspf 565 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 54 fps 18.4790 mspf 271 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 34 fps 29.5726 mspf 170 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 38 fps 26.2291 mspf 191 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 52 fps 19.0485 mspf 263 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 5 fps 209.0658 mspf 24 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 21 fps 47.4830 mspf 106 rendered framesMy 9600Pro vs the 5900Ultra results as above
Code:
2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting):; 133;fps; 666;rendered 101
3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)):; 92;fps; 461;rendered 70
4 ( Per Pixel Point Light Shader (Phong)):; 94;fps; 469;rendered na
5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)):; 75;fps; 377;rendered 57
6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting):; 98;fps; 489;rendered 71
7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections):; 85;fps; 426;rendered 60
8 ( Per Pixel BRDF-Phong/Anisotropic Lighting):; 74;fps; 373;rendered na
9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader):; 67;fps; 337;rendered 26
10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping):; 135;fps; 676;rendered 130
11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping):; 119;fps; 593;rendered 113
12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping):; 81;fps; 404;rendered 54
13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping):; 60;fps; 300;rendered 50
14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader):; 65;fps; 326;rendered 34
15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader):; 79;fps; 395;rendered 52
16 ( Per Pixel Tile Shader):; 44;fps; 218;rendered na
17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting):; 8;fps; 39;rendered 5
18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting):; 59;fps; 294;rendered 21
19 ( Dual Depth Shadow Mapping With 3x3 Bilinear Percentage Closer Filter):; 15;fps; 78;rendered na
20 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (cross blur)):; 32;fps; 160;rendered na
21 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (gaussian blur)):; 36;fps; 182;rendered na
22 ( Per Pixel Edge Detection And Hatching Shader):; 21;fps; 105;rendered na
23 ( Per Pixel Water Colour Shader):; 23;fps; 118;rendered naDeathKnight
Regular
Man, can't believe my 9500 Pro (and even a 9600 Pro) are getting higher framerates in all of the tests over a GFFX 5900 Ultra. Really brings to light Nvidia's shader problems.
