This is the one forum I visit where IQ refers to Image Quality first, Intelligence Quotient second. In the latter use, use of I.Q. for people over 18 is overrated anyway. And in general, EQ is much more important.
This is the one forum I visit where IQ refers to Image Quality first, Intelligence Quotient second. In the latter use, use of I.Q. for people over 18 is overrated anyway. And in general, EQ is much more important.
I was about to Google "eejit" but then it occurred to me that you meant "idiot" with a funny pronunciation.
Does this mean the collective IQ goes back down today? :|
Its Irish.I was about to Google "eejit" but then it occurred to me that you meant "idiot" with a funny pronunciation.
IndeedI think him and his style is the antithesis to B3D.
There was a user here who claimed 20 frames per second in Crysis was equivalent to 60 frames per second in Half-Life. Thus the mystical "Crysis fps" was born.
That's him."2008 IQ is unacceptable", Kevpla?... that you.?.. Kevpla... Urdnot Wrex... Professor... Maxmillion... Maximilian?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=kevpla
If it's this guy then I love him, add me as buddy M.
I think that's a legitimate point, because the motion blurring in Crysis may trick the brain into seeing more fluid motion than exists.That would be me. Although I actually claimed that 25-30fps in Crysis is equal to 50-60 in HL2. I still stand by it, after playing both games many many many times, and testing the feel of both games in many locations. 25fps in HL2 is a slideshow, yet 2560x1600 2xAA in Crysis (8x in warhead) plays perfectly. I can score headshot after headshot, even in MP. If you don't feel the fluidity of movement and gameplay at 25fps in Crysis you're just getting too hung up on numbers.
I don't want to hold his idiocy against him, .
Don't moderators check every post a new member makes, before letting it through? Why not do the same with IQ?