Has anyone checked NFS shift ?
Seems 720p 2*AA for Xbox 360 to me ...need confirmation [also on the PS3 ver.]
Seems 720p 2*AA for Xbox 360 to me ...need confirmation [also on the PS3 ver.]
Image Quality and Framebuffer Analysis for Available/release build Games *Read the first post*
- Thread starter Farid
- Start date
I have a question about QAA. I have tried fight night round 4 for the ps3 but I never seen a properly use of QAA how in this game 
I haven't seen a single jaggie in a whole demo. My question is: exists different levels of QAA or not? Because I never seen an excellent use of QAA in any game of the ps3 except that. Really good.
I haven't seen a single jaggie in a whole demo. My question is: exists different levels of QAA or not? Because I never seen an excellent use of QAA in any game of the ps3 except that. Really good.Nope, QAA is just QAA.
Yup, but there were also a mode that is very similar to Quincunx, it used 4xMSAA as a base 4x-tap9.
List of nv40 AA modes.
The UE3 is highly customisable. But in this case, the game doesn't seem to support this feature and it would be quite surprising.If it was possible i think giving some AA would help a lot in ps3's version, maybe some QAA, does the ut3 engine even support that?
You mean 2xMSAA?
' 4x-9tap:Another legacy mode from the Nv2x/Nv3x line that was never officially supported. Similar to quincunx it uses pixel sharing post processing that reduces edge aliasing.. It does however cause a blur effect like quincunx. '
Mmm interesting...it is possible to use on the ps3? Because really Fight night 4 has better egdes in comparison to Fifa 10.
Last edited by a moderator:
yea sorry 2*MSAA, I should've made that clear.
Would'nt the color contrast make some difference ? Fifa is bright while FNR4 is not so bright.
Also since FNR4 has larger amount of pixels being taken by objects/characters compared to Fifa where the cam is zoomed out & everything takes less amount of pixels wouldnt that help FNR4 have less visible jaggies compared to FIFA ?
Could be...my question is if possible these different technics on the ps3...
Have these modes been checked with the G7x line
One might consider just how terrible ordered grid AA is though for the number of samples being stored. All of these other modes are a waste of resources too i.e. anything with supersampling and anything with more than 4 multisamples... which basically brings the list back to 2xQ, 2x, 4xRGMS.
The only thing that might be a better trade-off is custom edge AA seen in a few games already.
Yes.
It used to work on my 6800 and 8800 and seems to work with gtx285 as well.Have these modes been checked with the G7x line
One might consider just how terrible ordered grid AA is though for the number of samples being stored. All of these other modes are a waste of resources too i.e. anything with supersampling and anything with more than 4 multisamples... which basically brings the list back to 2xQ, 2x, 4xRGMS.
Ordered grid looks bad, but SSAA does wonders to many games.
Indeed, something like 2xMSAA with intels MLAA done before resolve might be quite nice looking.
brain_stew
Regular
It was very effective in Crysis (especially at the "2") setting because it dealt with the foliage aliasing as well. In a game with a load of transparency aliasing like Crysis it honestly works better than standard 2xmsaa imo and the performance cost in Crysis was virtually nil.
Considering the PS3 in particular tends to struggle with msaa so much, its a really good solution for the consoles if done well imo. Works fine with games that use MRT as well, Call of Juarez has a pretty good implementation.
Have these modes been checked with the G7x line
.
4x9Tap is still available through nHancer on my GTX 260, don't see why they would have took out support in the G7x generation only to bring it back in subsequant generations. I sometimes use it in UT3 as it helps deal with the shader aliasing.
Last edited by a moderator:
Indeed... That info was done on an NV40, and I didn't know anyone tested it on newer hardware, which is why I asked...
At any rate, if developers do use it, it'd only be in games where they can even afford 4xAA. The fact that it's ordered grid doesn't make it very enticing for near-axis angles though. Using the blur to "solve" shader aliasing is a bit of a poor way to go about it though.
Is it stuff that can be fixed like for example GRID that has it off by default (highlighted part)?
<multisampling option="8xmsaa">
<back_buffer level="8xmsaa" />
<colour_target level="8xmsaa" />
<minimap level="8xmsaa" />
<dynamic_envmap level="8xmsaa" />
<static_envmap level="8xmsaa" />
<rear_view_mirror level="4xmsaa"/>
Makes for a sweat difference in cleanliness making it pretty much 'bullshotiz'.
<multisampling option="8xmsaa">
<back_buffer level="8xmsaa" />
<colour_target level="8xmsaa" />
<minimap level="8xmsaa" />
<dynamic_envmap level="8xmsaa" />
<static_envmap level="8xmsaa" />
<rear_view_mirror level="4xmsaa"/>
Makes for a sweat difference in cleanliness making it pretty much 'bullshotiz'.
Well 8xAA for reflections pretty much removes any aliasing coupled with the 1024x1024 reflections. Though the game sported smaller effect buffer but that could be fixed to. 1:1 effects for no ugly PP aliasing silhouttes (smoke, depth of field etc)!
Similar threads
