AMD: R8xx Speculation

How soon will Nvidia respond with GT300 to upcoming ATI-RV870 lineup GPUs

  • Within 1 or 2 weeks

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Within a month

    Votes: 5 3.2%
  • Within couple months

    Votes: 28 18.1%
  • Very late this year

    Votes: 52 33.5%
  • Not until next year

    Votes: 69 44.5%

  • Total voters
    155
  • Poll closed .
powercolor_hd5770eyefinity_1.jpg


powercolor_hd5770eyefinity_2.jpg
 
An HD 5770 Eyefinity edition? Wow! Why is it that I see only 5 display ports on that card?! :LOL:
 
He means standard PCB, standard clocks, standard everything, just bigger memory. So far we've only seen 2 GB GDDR5 on Eyefinity-6 models and that Asus ROG board.
 
He means standard PCB, standard clocks, standard everything, just bigger memory. So far we've only seen 2 GB GDDR5 on Eyefinity-6 models and that Asus ROG board.

the PCB isn't anywhere near the reference PCB:
X-2009092700105389423.jpg

vs
20100305asus1.jpg


edit:
And the eyefinity6 edition's pcb seems to be same as normal hd5870's excluding the memory-area and of course the display outputs:
002260977.jpg
 
edit:
And the eyefinity6 edition's pcb seems to be same as normal hd5870's excluding the memory-area and of course the display outputs:

I dunno, seems pretty different to me. There's a lot more traces and a lot more components. Which will affect more than just the top layer that we can see. And it's not like the standard 5870 board has premade reserved spaces for those extra components, which means all those traces have to be added rather than just chips place into existing reserved but not used areas.

Regards,
SB
 
I dunno, seems pretty different to me. There's a lot more traces and a lot more components. Which will affect more than just the top layer that we can see. And it's not like the standard 5870 board has premade reserved spaces for those extra components, which means all those traces have to be added rather than just chips place into existing reserved but not used areas.

Regards,
SB

So the Eyefinity boards are completely different as far as manufacturing is concerned even if they do share a similar layout and functionality?
 
That's a good catch - I'm surprised that more review sites did not hone in on the fact that this card essentially performs like a 128-bit card for AA situations.
Just stumbled across this TweakTown review, which again shows that the 5830 seems to be extremely bandwidth-limited when AA is turned on:
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3170/sapphire_radeon_hd_5830_video_card_in_crossfire/index7.html


All they did was overclock the memory by 15%, and in every gaming-related test except Vantage and Batman:AA (which both had no AA enabled) the OCed card was 10-15% faster than the reference model.
 
Just stumbled across this TweakTown review, which again shows that the 5830 seems to be extremely bandwidth-limited when AA is turned on:
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3170/sapphire_radeon_hd_5830_video_card_in_crossfire/index7.html


All they did was overclock the memory by 15%, and in every gaming-related test except Vantage and Batman:AA (which both had no AA enabled) the OCed card was 10-15% faster than the reference model.
That's just amazing, near 100% scaling with memory clock. Clearly AMD knew it and toyed with the idea of releasing it with higher memory clock, as shown by some of the reviewers card having 1150Mhz memory clock initially. I must say, that would have looked quite a bit better with that, instead of being very close to HD5770 in performance that would have put it right in-between HD5770 & HD5850, but I guess they just didn't want to require somewhat high-end gddr5 chips for that card in the end.
 
Back
Top