Woops. Missed your post on last page.
I've been reading every part otherwise, but probably thought the post before you was last and I started on last page instead.
- Status
Woops. Missed your post on last page.
I've been reading every part otherwise, but probably thought the post before you was last and I started on last page instead.
Silent_Buddha
Legend
A bit surprised? Unless Nvidia is running into some semi-serious financial difficulties combined with low demand and/or low margins (due to low yields) of what they are able to manufacture. I can't really see why they'd cancel wafer starts with a presumably profitable GF104. If all they had was GF100, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
But without some serious insider info, there's just no way to tell 1) if they actually are cancelling wafer starts and 2) the reasons behind such a move.
Regards,
SB
But without some serious insider info, there's just no way to tell 1) if they actually are cancelling wafer starts and 2) the reasons behind such a move.
Regards,
SB
Yeah I'm waiting for the fire sale on Nvidia's conference room chairs.....Charlie is a funny guy.
Blazkowicz
Legend
a brainfart I've had : why not allow SLI on AMD chipsets?
the only other way is with an Intel X58, and high end nvidia chipsets for AM3 or socket 775 have felt irrelevant.
actually the only relevant nvidia chipsets I can think of are the ION (a rebranded geforce 9300, on the way out) and the nforce 720d (cheapest Asrock and Gigabyte mobos with a decent power stage)
the only other way is with an Intel X58, and high end nvidia chipsets for AM3 or socket 775 have felt irrelevant.
actually the only relevant nvidia chipsets I can think of are the ION (a rebranded geforce 9300, on the way out) and the nforce 720d (cheapest Asrock and Gigabyte mobos with a decent power stage)
There is a possibility that they are cancelling wafer starts of dies other than GF104.
Well their revenue for Q2 went from an expected ~960 million to ~810, which can only mean that they didn't sell as much as they thought they would.
So it only makes sense that they would cancel a few wafer starts.
Bouncing Zabaglione Bros.
Legend
There's little point in stuffing the inventory channel when it's already been stuffed and you're still trying to get rid of what you've got. Especially in this industry, you run the risk of being stuck with a load of outdated product as your next product cycle comes around.
I thought exclusive vendorship would have died late 2008, early 2009. I'm shocked it still exists today in 2010.
only EVGA and Galaxy left, right?
EVGA,1 Galaxy, PNY, Palit (including Gainward, owned by Palit) and Sparkle at least come to mind
the rest are all subsidiaries (i believe) of other manufacturers that also make AMD cards, rolling off the same assembly line doesn't sound "exclusive" to me.
Palit at least isn't, and owns only Gainward from other brands, thus making only nV on their "own brand" and subsidiary.
PNY isn't anyones subsidiary either. Not sure about the rest though, but I don't think they're subsidiaries either. I left for example Zotac out because I know it's PC Partners subsidiary like Sapphire is
Although Palit currently doesn't sell any ATI cards, they sure still are an ATI/AMD partner
http://www.palit.biz/main/partner.php?lang=en, so yes, PNY and Sparkle go on that list as well.
http://www.palit.biz/main/partner.php?lang=en, so yes, PNY and Sparkle go on that list as well.
- Status
Similar threads
