Here is the leaked review http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=83241
NVIDIA GT200 Rumours & Speculation Thread
- Thread starter Arun
- Start date
- Status
jimmyjames123
Regular
Ironic, because in the Financial Analyst session a few weeks ago, Jen Hsun told the analysts that NVIDIA is about to "open up a can of whoop ass".
http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/NVIDIA_GeForce_GTX_280_Preview/5872.html
Vr-zone has their GTX280 is up!
Vr-zone has their GTX280 is up!
I have a car that's smaller than that chip...
That said, it's scaling well in QW, beter than the GX2
Last edited by a moderator:
Driver issues, or is it simply because G200 is simply G92 GX2 on a single chip?
Pretty underwhelming at this stage.
Magnum_Force
Newcomer
Because it has twice as many transistors, twice the memory bus and buffer size, and yet performance somewhat worse in some benchmarks, perhaps??
It doesn't have twice anything compared to the GX2. Well frame-buffer maybe. But in terms of raw performance specs come in under the GX2.
Magnum_Force
Newcomer
Lol, true, but none the less it really is somewhat underwhelming, probably for nvidia too, I bet they REALLY wanted that Teraflop.
http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=2151
FW 177.26
Crysis 19x12 no AA high details
GTX260 - 34.56fps
GTX280 - 38.75fps
Crysis 19x12 no AA very high details
GTX260 - 26.55fps
GTX280 - 29.31fps
FW177.34
Crysis 19x12 no AA high details
GTX260 - 43.90
GTX280 - 48.55fps
Crysis 19x12 no AA very high details
GTX260 - 37.35
GTX280 - 42.80fps
And there are SLi numbers too.
FW 177.26
Crysis 19x12 no AA high details
GTX260 - 34.56fps
GTX280 - 38.75fps
Crysis 19x12 no AA very high details
GTX260 - 26.55fps
GTX280 - 29.31fps
FW177.34
Crysis 19x12 no AA high details
GTX260 - 43.90
GTX280 - 48.55fps
Crysis 19x12 no AA very high details
GTX260 - 37.35
GTX280 - 42.80fps
And there are SLi numbers too.
LOL, it's a fake done by an italian guy...
http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showpost.php?p=22900939&postcount=5451
In this post he said he did through MS Paint.
No way that they can get such an increase with only a new release of drivers...
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL, it's a fake done by an italian guy...
http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showpost.php?p=22900939&postcount=5451
In this post he said he did through MS Paint.
No way thay can get such an increase with only a new release of drivers...
And no way the GTX 280 will get 43 fps in 19x12 very high settings...
Fuck me, I would expect this kind of response after a personal attack.
It doesn't even outperform the GX2 in Crysis (a game that NVIDIA has been praising as PC gaming's gospel), has some micro-stuttering issues of its own and is pretty much a double up of G80 in terms of transistor count (and some functional units).
It's fast. It's almost 2X again, just like G80>7800GTX. It's very fast. Just like G80 as well, it might not be 2X right away in all cases, but it's descendants will get there and beyond.
That said, I think it will be a tough sell at 649, if 4870 is truly 1.4X 9800GTX, and is priced at 329. Running those numbers you'd generally be hard pressed to justify 300 extra dollars for 280. Unless you are rich, or have a very specific need with a large display.
260 is where the value is..
That said, I think it will be a tough sell at 649, if 4870 is truly 1.4X 9800GTX, and is priced at 329. Running those numbers you'd generally be hard pressed to justify 300 extra dollars for 280. Unless you are rich, or have a very specific need with a large display.
260 is where the value is..
LOL, it's a fake done by an italian guy...
http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showpost.php?p=22900939&postcount=5451
In this post he said he did through MS Paint.
No way thay can get such an increase with only a new release of drivers...
Not fake according to spajdr:
spajdr said:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1681935&postcount=355
spajdr said:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1681939&postcount=356
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status
