Recent content by Stryyder

E-mail to Gabe and his response Link http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showthread.php?t=27817 Thoughts

I noticed the same thing bothered me too but although it is highly impropable it is possible, or if there was a mistake perhaps he transcgribed his testing notes incorrectly into the chart. Based on his comments the whole article has a 'rushed' feel to it, thats when people make mistakes.

That would be great if they didn't say that there were no image quality issues one would assume they would notice AA not being on in any image quality comparisons.

I knew that review was crap after I read this... His whole testing methodology is suspect, the fact that he wasn't savy enough to question his results or test on multiple AA/AF levels or the fact that he couldn't see that AA wasn't enabled on the NVIDIA cards is beyond negligent. That...

I think that in the next 6 mos people will be buying boards that can do both AGP and PCIe not dual PCIe boards.

Doubt he'll be able to tell you much, unless he wants to piss off his lawyers who are probably telling him not to talk about the specifics of the case.

Walt was going out of his way to interpert Kyles statments in a misleading way even after three people told him his perspective was at best obtuse. He seemed to refuse to take on any reasonable argument and then continue to reqrite his original post over and over again instead of challenging...

I was under the impression that they are still arguing the jurisdiction issue and that IL has submitted a brief as to why personal jurisdiction does not apply in Texas and [H] Lawyers have submitted a brief of why it should remain in Texas including in evidence exhibits showing that Tim Robbins...

This is a simple defamation case on crack. IL tried to force by the threat of legal action the retraction of an [H] article. [H] called the bluff and forced a lawsuit. This is bad for IL IF if the 20 Million in lost investments were lost not because of the article but because of the fact...

I am not alluding to gossip or heresay read the brief filed by Kyle's lawyers over at where is phantom. It has the chain of events as I described and a number of items in evidence you will find interesting. As you obviously have some Axe to grind with Kyle, seem to have very little business...

Your recollection of the events seems incorrect. 1)in February of 2004 Infinium Labs held a PRESS CONFERENCE say that if Hard did not remove the article they would file lawsuits. So this happened before the allegedly private letter 2) The letter with the 18 points was then issued on Feb...

Basically this is how I read it. 1)Out of the 18 points that the lawyers wanted addressed only 5 were considered by Kyle to have any merit and were then addressed. This is obvious from the fact that one of the 18 points was to remove the god damned article from his website and its still fing...

In the opinion of the article that noone but a few can read correct?

sorry your statement had none of the above qualifications in it I interperted it incorrectly as you knew for certain what the algorithm was doing.

Whats the basis of your conclusion?