Recent content by pixelbox

I know! Some believe it's because of the ps2 emulation. Anyway i meant since it's not based on new tech, it should be cheaper. But 300M transistors raises questions.

I didn't say that. I said "as expensive" as believed.

to me, this is good news. I means that ps3 wont be as expensive. One thing is questionable, whats up with all of those transistor?

So dev's are using 6 spe's now.:roll:

It's on Ign. It was said at the GDC.

What the hell?! Why did they make UMD's then?!:roll:

They one of the mags teem ico said that they had room for improving the engine...

Battery life is piss poor for the online, but as for the single it's about 5-6 hours verus 2 for online.

The price of the thing could be attrocious.

$199 psp http://psp.ign.com/articles/696/696068p1.html YES!!

i just hope it's not too expensive!:roll: :cry:

That's what the other websites said...all they did was slap sony's name on it. Boy, it would be nice if at the briefing, playstation's father said "still spring!".

Well you would still have to wait for an animation...Anyway i think the perfect system would feed all gaming images in the mind eliminating TVs all together.

Having the prices lower will obviously help push sales...but then again people will save for something that is worth the price. Where i work this happens a lot and i see HDTVs moving out the store pretty quickly.

You almost turned what i said into "expensive is good". I was trying to say cosumers follow good paradigm shifts. HDTV usage is growing because people are catching on. They feel it's quality meets it's price.