Recent content by Martillo1

Mine is on its way to Germany. Twenty one work days they said it would take, an today is the fifteenth day... I missed Bioshock, but I hope not to miss Halo 3.

Quantum aliasem hoc video.

Indeed.

Yes, Nvidia had a terrible product which could not compete with ATI's one, in part because of their fault (the main part), in part because of the good choice of ATI regarding the 24-bit precission an its acceptance by Microsoft's DX9 definition. Anyway, its product was in clear disadvantge...

Well, every company has its own interest, strategies and such, but bashing allways backfires. I am not talking about engineering, production, etc. This is at PR level. PR = Public Relations: PUBLIC and the way it percieves the company. Maybe what the autor rants about is very related to the...

What about W2000 and Linux support? Are NV40 and NV45 broken? My green eyes are turning red :evil:

Maybe they have added support for S.M. 3.0 :lol: Bah, just better manufacturing process. And I like the fan ala Nvidia :wink: edit:typos

What about using Peltier's effect?

Talk to the device about HAL 9000 :wink:

Buy at the rumour, sell at the news. It is said in spanish, I am sure the translation is terrible :lol:

Digi, absolute certainty is everyone's enemy. I hope you have learned it from your multi-kill-perma-banning experience. Humility protect us from our mistakes ;)

What I really hated of 3DMark was when they began to list all R3xxATI cards as "9500/9700 series" without any further information. I found it completely useless for performance comparisons model to model. That was the begining of the end of my liking for onions.

proof

Look for the sun and what it produces. Edit: typos

You missed my point. What I mean is that ATI itself admits its intentions of supporting S.M. 3.0. That, coupled with NVIDIA actually supporting S.M. 3.0 and the ease of development it gives, leads to the conclusion that S.M. 3.0 will be widely used. rgrds