I am disappionted about Futuremarks decision.
Is this a joke ----------the whole thing about Futuremark and Nvidia ?
I cant believe this.
Now "Cheat" are "optimization"
Cheater are partner.
Pure business.
I am confused.
Can you tell me how to comprehend "Change many 32 bit operations to 16 or even 12 bit operations with absolutely no loss of quality or functionality. "?
Absolutely no loss of quality or functionality????
JC
Change many 32 bit operations to 16 or even 12 bit operations with absolutely no loss of quality or functionality.
Even FX12 , no loss of quality or functionality???
It means
FP is useless,doesnt it?
And it means IQ of NV30path is identical to IQ of ARB2???
I am right,aint I?
So Futuremark should say that the
3dmark03 they noted is a
DEVELOPER vesion. It can do this.
They didnt say the version of 3dmark03 that includes advanced analytical tools to enable independent observers to catch any
potential questionable driver optimizations
is a Develop...
Misleading!
They never said they wouldnt release it to the public.They just said 3dmark03 include*^*^(.
So I think it is public version.
If they dont refer 3dmark03 public version,
they should said that.
No public???
We didnt know at all.
I want more.
3dmark03 public version doesnt include the tools,doesnt it?
Only some special 3dmark03 have???
We cant have free cam
Futuremark said
3DMark03 includes advanced analytical tools to enable independent observers to catch any
potential questionable driver optimizations.
Where are the tools???
Could you tell me?
advanced analytical tools to enable independent observers to catch any
potential...
Do 3DMark03 issues happen with NV non-optimized drivers?
Homepage
3DMark2003 Rendering issues
Does it occur with some NV non-optimized drivers?
I.E.
43.00,43.03 ect?
???