Recent content by Jaaanosik

Thanks. So 290X had 208W for 1000MHz and 390X is going to be 208W for 1100MHz. Some improvement.

I thought 290X was 250W; that would be an improvement.

390X - Grenada XT - 208W? Is it real? http://www.tecmundo.com.br/amd/81391-exclusivo-tecmundo-descobriu-tudo-novas-placas-amd.htm

"Proletarians of all countries, unite!" ... the Marxist approach might be a way to go. The testers should unite and create a multiplayer 'scripts' that they would run on their testing server. Everybody should be able to report more repeatable results.

Do the reviewers mention this? They have charts with noise and guess what cooler is in those charts.

F@H does not run. Ryan at AT mentioned half the stuff is not working right.

680 is a nice card. Good job NV. Still slower clock for clock than 7970, plus broken CUDA stuff in half of the applications.

Comments under the review. Edit: Comment from Ryan:

It's not an NV SKU. It was modified. It's loosing clock for clock comparison as well.

According to AT Folding@H is broken at the moment.

If I remember correctly I read about it at AnandTech. Their focus group member asked NV about that and they said yes. Never mentioned the extent though.

Fermi is using double vias as well AFAIK.

How far we are from release? When SI thread becomes monitor thread then it means AMD secrecy department is doing well. :D

Hey, news about Trinity from semiaccurate.

Where does OCDIMM fit here?