Recent content by engall

' You are wrong. It came from nVIDIA.

Yeah,you`re right.

http://www.hardspell.com/hard/showcont.asp?news_id=14372[/url]

OpenGL 2.0 spec call for Multiple render targets. But I remember that NV3x miss this feature. So it seems GeForce Fx series dont support OpenGL 2.0. Am I right? And ATi all Dx9 chips support Multiple render targets. It is much possbile that R9500 and up will meet OpenGL 2.0...

I mean if PS2.0 can do it ,why bother PS2.0b and PS3.0 in Farcry 1.2?

If so ,is it necessary to use PS2.0b and create PS2.0B profile?

But What about this? http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/far_cry_ps2.0b/page5.asp

As dave said,RV370/380 are based on RV360 and have the same featureset support. So it is so confusing. Or ATi dont wanna support Older hardware(R300) as possible as he can. Because it hurt sales? If so ,I will be disappointed about ATi.

You are so cute. :wink:

FarCry 1.2Patch. You see! :lol: http://www.elitebastards.com/page.php?pageid=5838&head=1&comments=1 :D :D

ATi Catalyst 4.8 beta leaked http://www.station-drivers.com/telechargement/ati/ati%204.8.exe Whoever has a X600/X300 can confirm that they support SM2.0B?

No. http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/far_cry_ps2.0b/page5.asp That looks like confirmed X600 support SM2.0B

Firstly,X600 is using 0.13u+low K instead of 0.11u. Secondly ,AFAIK X600/X300 dont support anything new from X800 such as 3Dc, SmartShader HD,SmartVISION HD ect.

Oh , the special driver is required for instancing instead of SM2.0B. I still cant imagine that X600/300 can be Sm2.0b and R300 cant.

http://www.driverheaven.net/index.php?action=view&s=976367d49fa57758a176c26567dcaf94&articleid=15593 Who can tell me why? X600/X300 and R300 have the same shader capability ---SmartShade 2.0. Why X600/300 can support SM2.0B and R3x0 cant?