Recent content by A.L.M.

Should we take this as a "yes, you are going to see all reviews with 8.851 drivers on?" :wink:

Source?

Interesting... :wink:

Lower than prices shown on that site, I meant. :wink:

Maybe prices for Cayman will be lower than that on those places. ;)

Hmm, too low I think. Considered GTX580 prices, HD6970 seems fairly priced and also preferable, if it could deliver a comparable performance (maybe 5-10% below) at almost $100 less. HD6950 seems a bit overpriced, if compared to the HD6870. Maybe a 20$ decrease will help. At those prices and...

Some prices... ;) Sapphire HD 6970 2GB - $448 http://www.shopblt.com/cgi-bin/shop/shop.cgi?action=enter&thispage=0110040015012_BDY1568P.shtml&order_id=!ORDERID Sapphire HD 6950 2GB - $352...

In AMD slides? :shock: This means that there could be room for improvement even on what shown on marketing slides? :?: That seems pretty pointless from AMD if it is so... I mean, shouldn't marketing material show best case scenarios? Hmm, so are you saying that these slides are real but older...

Judging from the benches of the guys posting on Hardwareluxx.de, HD6970 is better than a GTX580 even on Crysis at 1920x1200 AA4x. ;) To me it's not bad at all... It seems like by cherrypicking benches an HD6970 could challenge a GTX580, so it is probably a bit slower across the line (5-10%...

Maybe I didn't pay attention to the whole discussion... But who did say that the unit that has to go is the "fatty" one? I mean, to me it doesn't make sense at all to eliminate the only unit capable of doing transcendental operations... It would mean to rethink all units (making them all special...

So Fermi is rougly three times faster than Cypress in triangle setup... This is something I was thinking about, looking at iXBT theoretical tests... http://translate.google.it/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ixbt.com%2Fvideo3%2Fgf100-2-part2.shtml&sl=ru&tl=en&hl=&ie=UTF-8 It seems like it's not...

Already posted? :embarrased: http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/3_0/toolkit/docs/NVIDIA_CUDA_ProgrammingGuide_3.0.pdf http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/3_0/docs/NVIDIA_FermiCompatibilityGuide.pdf...

The recommended PSU is not really indicative when it comes to TDP... It can be more indicative of the real consumption, maybe... For example, a 600W PSU (without any recommendation of current ratings) is recommended for a HD5850 crossfire (...

Picture / source? Between a GTX280 and a GTX260 192SP there's a smaller difference than between a GTX480 and GTX470, and still the two TDP differ of more than 50W....

If it was even 290W, they would have said <295W. If it's < 300W, you can be sure that 295W<=GTX480 TDP<=300W. Well, as long as you get enough performance, you could be right. But, as the supposed GTX480 MSRP price may suggest, there are some chances that you could get a good deal of...