AMD Vega Hardware Reviews

Maybe to save money?
Doubt it, Strix has actually more VRMs than ref.
Jayztwocent saw the same thing, the vanilla amd card clocks a little higher.

I guess the asus cooler is not designed correctly for Vega (bad gpu/hbm contact, bad vrm&co contact, ... ?)

But, I get the need for custom cooling, but why did asus made a custom vrm/power delivery design too ? Amd stock is top notch, hell it's one thing in Vega which is nearly perfect, and that's the thing they change... ?
It's ASUS, they always manage to fuck up at least something in their AMD cards. Their 400 cards were meh.
 
It's ASUS, they always manage to fuck up at least something in their AMD cards.
I noticed in pictures of the Guru3D (I think it was) disassembly that the mosfet from the topmost phase is only half covered by the heatsink and accompanying thermal tape. Thermal camera imagery also shows some 110C temps in that area, I bet that's from that very same half-covered mosfet. If they'd just shifted the power phases maybe 4mm down towards the PCIe connector side of the card, all of the fets would have been covered. Very halfassed, what are their product design, prototyping and QC people doing???

This is supposed to be a high-end premium product.
 
I noticed in pictures of the Guru3D (I think it was) disassembly that the mosfet from the topmost phase is only half covered by the heatsink and accompanying thermal tape. Thermal camera imagery also shows some 110C temps in that area, I bet that's from that very same half-covered mosfet. If they'd just shifted the power phases maybe 4mm down towards the PCIe connector side of the card, all of the fets would have been covered. Very halfassed, what are their product design, prototyping and QC people doing???

This is supposed to be a high-end premium product.
It's ASUS.
They are only good for mobos.
Wait for Sapphire if you want some actually good AiB Vega.
There's no way around it.
 
Thermal camera imagery also shows some 110C temps in that area, I bet that's from that very same half-covered mosfet. If they'd just shifted the power phases maybe 4mm down towards the PCIe connector side of the card, all of the fets would have been covered. Very halfassed, what are their product design, prototyping and QC people doing???
What's shocking is that cooling the power delivery apparently wasn't part of the cooler design requirement on a premium part. FETs can run hot, which makes cooling them that much easier. However, it's always possible that extra FET is powering something different. Say HBM2 or board components and won't have the same draw as the others. Going back to that Hovis design with XB, driving core and memory separately, even within the chip, may be part of the design. Run even the memory controller at different voltages for some added isolation. That could be the case here.
 
This is supposed to be a high-end premium product.
It appears ASUS is just paper launching a token product just to claim dips on being the first, however other AIBs appear not interested in pursuing custom Vegas. After MSI, now comes GIGABYTE.
GIGABYTE has stated that there are no current plans to make a custom Radeon RX Vega 64. This might change in the future. But for now, early Vega 64 adopters have no choice but to settle for the reference design or or custom design cards coming out from other vendors. There is still a light hope for the Vega 56 though, since GIGABYTE didn't discard the possibility of releasing a RX Vega 56 Gaming G1.
https://www.techpowerup.com/237379/...o-release-a-custom-radeon-rx-vega-64#comments
 
New Vega driver out.

You people with cards already, mind trying it out and reporting back any changes?

Thanks! :)
 
New Vega driver out.

You people with cards already, mind trying it out and reporting back any changes?

Thanks! :)
We live to serve!

However, it seems multi GPU related, plus a few specific game fixes. Anything in particular you’re thinking of? (I’d love to see a WattMan overhaul.)
 
We live to serve!
:D

Anything in particular you’re thinking of? (I’d love to see a WattMan overhaul.)
Nah, I dunno. Magic driver, new geometry processing pipeline finally being enabled, anything of the sort... Well, one can always dream, right?

Wattman yes. Constant issues there, is it finally reliable now or still wonky with regards to changing settings and/or getting them to stick?
 
Nah, I dunno. Magic driver, new geometry processing pipeline finally being enabled, anything of the sort... Well, one can always dream, right?
If it's ever going to happen, it's not happening in this driver.
It's mostly an add-on of optimizations for Total War: Warhammer 2.

I just checked and the last big driver update came in December 2016, with the ReLive edition that also brought Radeon Chill and some other features.
The big update before that was the change from Catalyst to Crimson which happened in November 2015.

I'd say there should be a big driver change in late 2017 too (November -> December, perhaps January when Raja supposedly comes back). If Vega doesn't get all its features aren't enabled until there, I'd say they're probably never going to happen.
 
:D


Nah, I dunno. Magic driver, new geometry processing pipeline finally being enabled, anything of the sort... Well, one can always dream, right?

Wattman yes. Constant issues there, is it finally reliable now or still wonky with regards to changing settings and/or getting them to stick?

So far this new driver is keeping my Vega 56@64 2C cooler than before. I mean, whatever target temp you set in Wattman, card will settle at target -2C. This wasn't the case in 2 previous drivers, so it must be a bug or intentional decision to lower GPU temps.

Other than that, lost 0.5MH/s mining ETH :)
 
Back
Top