Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:10   #1
nelg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,557
Default Nv40 16 full pipelines- The Inq.

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=14373

Quote:
US sources close to Nvidia have confirmed that their next generation GPU will feature a full sixteen pipelines – not as previously speculated an 8x2 arrangement - and this is reflected in the increased transistor count of circa 205-210 million, up from a previously speculated 175 million.
__________________
on my way to becoming dark matter..........
nelg is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:21   #2
Sxotty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Under a Crushing Burden
Posts: 4,290
Default

Well it is always fun to root for the underdog ... we shall see.


If it is true though how hot would it be man I need to move to alaska so I can heat my house with the computer or something.
__________________
You bought horse armor didn't you?
Sxotty is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:25   #3
lost
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 52
Default

My guess is that unless the Inq is incorrect, nVidia missed their target clocks on the second to last stepping of nv40 and decided to strap on another 4x1/2x2 unit to make up for the clock difference. Lets say they lose 50 more mHz from the added die size so they can still maintain some of their margins. Most likely, the chip will still launch at 450+ mHz core speeds, which means they lost 10% of their clock but gain an addition 33% performance. 90*1.33=120%. So they are left with a product 20% faster in non memory limited operations...which should be all of them except high AA in high res...

Maybe there will be a high end fight with nVidia able to deliver ps2.0 performance and ps3.0 compliance. I certainly hope so!
lost is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:25   #4
Bouncing Zabaglione Bros.
Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,165
Default

Is this the same Nvidia that told us that pipelines are meaningless and that the NV3x was 8x1 when it wasn't? We'll probably find that it's only ever 16x1 when doing stencil-only ops in monochrome.
Bouncing Zabaglione Bros. is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:26   #5
d2thez
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default

If that is indeed true.....then considering a 16-pipeline architecture, a core between 500-600 mhz, and Nvidia's ability to imrpove performance with their unified compiler, I see no way for ATI's R420 to compete.

I am not here to start a flame war, but ATI's "extreme pipelines" that were touted in another artcile had better be something......
d2thez is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:27   #6
digitalwanderer
Dangerously Mirthful
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Winfield, IN USA
Posts: 15,292
Default

I'm sorry, but I just don't believe a damned thing out of nVidia anymore until they can lay it on the table and prove it to me.
digitalwanderer is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:33   #7
jimbob0i0
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 115
Send a message via ICQ to jimbob0i0 Send a message via MSN to jimbob0i0 Send a message via Yahoo to jimbob0i0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalwanderer
I'm sorry, but I just don't believe a damned thing out of nVidia anymore until they can lay it on the table and prove it to me.
I'm with you mate on this one..... I find this very suspicious - esp given die sizes...
__________________
For all your nForce needs...
jimbob0i0 is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:34   #8
elroy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 257
Default

Can anyone confirm this? I think this is the first time that this has been stated.
elroy is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:40   #9
Florin
Merrily dodgy
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The colonies
Posts: 1,398
Default

My feeling that NV40 is gonna rawk is getting stronger. I want one.
Florin is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:43   #10
anaqer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,287
Default

If true ( and that's quite a gargantuan IF ) I can't help but wonder how they're going to run those 200+ million transistors at anything even close to 500MHz.
DustBuster Extreme, anyone? :?
anaqer is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:51   #11
Unknown Soldier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,177
Default

This comes from theinq.. can you really trust anything this site puts up after the DX9.1 mess. Lol next we'll hear Nvidia will release the NV50 by August.

US
Unknown Soldier is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:53   #12
MuFu
Chief Spastic Baboon
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Location, Location with Kirstie Allsopp
Posts: 2,258
Default

Ahhh.... what sweet, sweet news.
__________________
=>>>YOUR FACE HERE<<<=
$50. PayPal/cheque/direct transfer accepted.
MuFu is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:55   #13
PaulS
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 481
Default

I'd be suprised if these were 16 genuine, full pipelines. If it turns out to be true, it looks like nVidia have been playing ATi at their own misinformation game 8)
PaulS is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:55   #14
Mariner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,151
Default

Well, if it is truly a 16 pipeline chip (which I doubt), it wouldn't need to run at such a high clock speed.

A 16-pipeline 400 MHz chip would have a third more fillrate than a 600 MHz 8-pipeline chip.

Personally, I reckon this rumour is a load of tosh. 8)
Mariner is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:57   #15
digitalwanderer
Dangerously Mirthful
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Winfield, IN USA
Posts: 15,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MuFu
Ahhh.... what sweet, sweet news.
Don't tell me you think it might be real MuFu? If that's the case I might just revise my opinion!
digitalwanderer is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:58   #16
Bouncing Zabaglione Bros.
Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Florin
My feeling that NV40 is gonna rawk is getting stronger. I want one.
Yeah, yeah. We've heard it all before - a couple of months before NV30, and then NV35. It was bullshit then, it's probably BS now.
Bouncing Zabaglione Bros. is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 15:59   #17
MuFu
Chief Spastic Baboon
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Location, Location with Kirstie Allsopp
Posts: 2,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalwanderer
Quote:
Originally Posted by MuFu
Ahhh.... what sweet, sweet news.
Don't tell me you think it might be real MuFu? If that's the case I might just revise my opinion!
Who cares? Just nice that there's something new to talk about - that R420 thread was getting really pitiful, hehe.

I hope it is true.

The people I've talked to about it say the figures they've seen tally with an 8-pipe design though.
__________________
=>>>YOUR FACE HERE<<<=
$50. PayPal/cheque/direct transfer accepted.
MuFu is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 16:03   #18
Tim
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MuFu
Who cares? Just nice that something's happened - that R420 thread is getting really pitiful now. I hope it is true.

The people I've talked to about it say the figures they've seen tally with an 8-pipe design though.
How about a a NV31/NV36 like design where a 2x2 chip can work in a 4x1 mode. (in this case 8x2 chip with a 16x1 mode).
Tim is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 16:05   #19
digitalwanderer
Dangerously Mirthful
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Winfield, IN USA
Posts: 15,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MuFu
Who cares? Just nice that there's something new to talk about - that R420 thread was getting really pitiful, hehe.
What, you got something against Vikings?

Quote:
I hope it is true.

The people I've talked to about it say the figures they've seen tally with an 8-pipe design though.
Thanks MuFu, that fits more with what I've been hearing too. If nVidia had this to pull out of their hat I just got this feeling we would have heard about it before somehow.

I kind of hope it's true too though, I really would prefer to see it be an actual contest of the hardware this time as opposed to seeing how "creative" one IHV can get with their "optimizations".
digitalwanderer is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 16:05   #20
MuFu
Chief Spastic Baboon
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Location, Location with Kirstie Allsopp
Posts: 2,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
How about a a NV31/NV36 like design where a 2x2 chip can work in a 4x1 mode. (in this case 8x2 chip with a 16x1 mode).
Hinges on that transistor count figure I reckon - the main line of speculation has been 8x2/16x0 (or whatever you like to call it) but that was with the 160-175mill figure in mind.

210 million transistors is approximately a whole NV36's worth over NV35.
__________________
=>>>YOUR FACE HERE<<<=
$50. PayPal/cheque/direct transfer accepted.
MuFu is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 16:14   #21
THe_KELRaTH
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Surrey Heath UK
Posts: 471
Default

It's probably 16 Virtual.. if you squint enough

Must be nearly time for the Doom 3 whiteboards - something this high, competitor near the floor.....
__________________
"Sure I've got a Photographic memory ....... but it just needs developing!"
THe_KELRaTH is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 16:16   #22
PaulS
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 481
Default

Here's a thought:

Given that the NV45 was originally targeted at 0.11, and that the NV40 is now effectively what the refresh would have been, is it possible they've moved it onto 0.11 as well? It would surely make those kind of transistor figures more attainable, especially in the absence of LowK.

Coupled with the TSMC/nVidia/0.11 announcement just a few days ago...
PaulS is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 16:18   #23
Ailuros
Epsilon plus three
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chania
Posts: 7,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MuFu
Who cares? Just nice that there's something new to talk about - that R420 thread was getting really pitiful, hehe.
Does that mean that we have to get back to being serious again? Awwwww that's not fun anymore....


Quote:
The people I've talked to about it say the figures they've seen tally with an 8-pipe design though.
I've also read about a rumour that it's 3 FPUs per SIMD; 24FPUs in total. If that should be true, then I'd love to know how on God's green earth that would make sense with any power of "16" heh.....
Ailuros is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 16:19   #24
MuFu
Chief Spastic Baboon
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Location, Location with Kirstie Allsopp
Posts: 2,258
Default

Edit - Argh.
__________________
=>>>YOUR FACE HERE<<<=
$50. PayPal/cheque/direct transfer accepted.
MuFu is offline  
Old 26-Feb-2004, 16:22   #25
fbg1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ithaca, NY USA
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier
This comes from theinq.. can you really trust anything this site puts up after the DX9.1 mess. Lol next we'll hear Nvidia will release the NV50 by August.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't they the first to break the Yamhill story six months ago? You talk as though they're always wrong, but I don't know if that's the case...
fbg1 is offline  

 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
r420 may beat nv40 in doom3 with anti-aliasing LokeshRay 3D Architectures & Chips 295 28-Jun-2004 08:39
NV40: Surprise, disappointment, or just what you expected? Nick Spolec 3D Architectures & Chips 350 22-Apr-2004 09:13
NV40: TMU Pooling and proper filtering? Luminescent 3D Architectures & Chips 5 15-Apr-2004 11:50
Nv30 to have 10 pipelines? duncan36 3D Architectures & Chips 18 01-Sep-2002 21:27
triangle and pixel-independant pipelines psurge 3D Architectures & Chips 5 14-Aug-2002 19:42


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.