If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
With current hardware, 3D textures take up too much texture memory. This I take is the main reason why they are not been utilized by developers. Does the P10's virtual texturing system make 3D textures more feasible? If so, up to what extent? Does it take a step foward to for fast voxel graphics?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Crazy coder
|
I would say that it will help some, but I'm not sure 3d textures are going to be used for materials anytime soon. I see many other uses, for instance I usually do bumpmapping by using a 3d texture containing a vector field. For such uses you don't need very large textures, 64x64x64 is what I use and it's good enough for most things, and that's just 0.5MB.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3dfx Rampage ;) | Ante P | 3D Architectures & Chips | 219 | 26-Feb-2012 19:48 |
| Xbox team joins Virtual PC development | one | Console Technology | 6 | 24-Sep-2004 00:01 |
| ATi is ch**t**g in Filtering | Bitpower | 3D Architectures & Chips | 1200 | 11-Jun-2004 18:43 |
| 6800U + 512 MB of GDDR3 = larger use of 3D Textures ? | Panajev2001a | 3D Architectures & Chips | 20 | 18-Apr-2004 06:38 |
| The AGP bus, what kind of bottleneck? | JF_Aidan_Pryde | 3D Architectures & Chips | 8 | 14-Aug-2002 00:54 |