If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
penguins
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,979
|
Our friends at RealWorldTech have put out a new article taking a look at memory bandwidth and its relevance to GPU performance:
"Memory bandwidth is a critical to feeding the shader arrays in programmable GPUs. We show that memory is an integral part of a good performance model and can easily impact graphics by 40% or more. The implications are important for upcoming integrated graphics, such as AMD’s Llano and Intel’s Ivy." It's a pretty interesting analysis with a wide variety of GPUs referenced from AMD and nVidia. Check it out!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 168
|
No one reply? Strange. To summarize, Assuming Drivers plays the +- 5% difference in test, an actual GFLOPS output / Bandwidth Performance Numbers actually gives a VERY accurate results of the GPU performance.
But it doesn't take into account the amount of memory with GFX card. With 22nm and 3D Package, Intel could literally stack 64MB of L3 Cache offering ~300GB/s of bandwidth to its iGPU. Of coz since the iGPU has low number of GFlops, it doesn't require that much bandwidth. But would these excess bandwidth help with the lower amount of memory? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Oz Yak
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,512
|
__________________
Is EA still bleeding cash like an executive doing an ED-209 demonstration.... - Grall |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|