If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,078
|
Well its out & there is no thread
I've switched to it (yay, Adblock!) having been using Chrome lately due to FF 3.6 & the FF 4 betas being unstable at least with the number of tabs I use. Of course, I've been using far fewer tabs in Chrome so probably would have been OK if I'd managed to trim down some of those tabs... Anyway, its been pretty solid for me so-far. No crashes at all. Only real problem I've had is a few times when closing several tabs in a row quickly it seems to loose track of one, leaving the tab on tab bar but un-clickable. Goes away after restarting the browser. For me a nice change is it doesn't auto-reload all your tabs on starting the browser, others with less tabs/faster connections may not like that so much though. Tab Groups are sweet, though the interface seems to be pretty laggy for me both at home with lots of tabs & with the crappy work PC. Tabs on top is somehow more of a PITA than in Chrome but they do have an option to put them back. Hmm, just discovered if you disable Menu bar it goes more Chrome with tabs in title bar = takes less vertical space which is better. Gonna try this out for a while. App Tab pinning gives you a permanently open tab available on all tab groups. For me I've just got Wikipedia there at the moment though. Most other stuff is split out into topic based groups. Might have some better use for it at work though.
__________________
But it's DOUBLE CONFIRMED |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Red-headed step child
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Guess ;)
Posts: 3,088
|
Just as an aside, you do know that Adblock has been available for Chrome for quite some time, right? As is NoScript and the like...
__________________
"...twisting my words" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Now Officially a Top 10 Poster
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posts: 13,221
|
Almost every browser (probably every?) has automatically loading your previously used tabs back as an option. FF4 is a new install probably and for some reason has it off currently, when you previously had the option enabled I presume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Oz Yak
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,528
|
Seems to slightly blur everything with a AA filter. Not sure if I like the effect or not. Really noticeable on the menu at the top of Beyond3D main page.
__________________
Is EA still bleeding cash like an executive doing an ED-209 demonstration.... - Grall |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,078
|
Its not failing to load the tabs, just it fills the tabs with the local cached version rather than reloading the latest version of the net.
This is good for my data cap & bandwidth. With unlimited data & better connection speed I'd probably be annoyed. Quote:
Last time I looked (quite a while back) it wasn't & I guess I presumed Google was denying it.
__________________
But it's DOUBLE CONFIRMED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Oz Yak
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,528
|
That was it, thanks. All the fonts look normal now as well. Whilst I'd rather have hardware acceleration on, it shouldn't blur everything so much.
__________________
Is EA still bleeding cash like an executive doing an ED-209 demonstration.... - Grall |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Now Officially a Top 10 Poster
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posts: 13,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,177
|
It's the morphological AA set in CCC. It must be seeing FF4 as a 3D app and applying AA to the whole window, including all the text - something it's particularly bad at doing well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Oz Yak
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,528
|
I don't have MLAA, or any AA forced on though, everything in my CCC is app default.
I believe they would have to work with AMD on making sure the DirectDrive acceleration renders the fonts properly. For the moment I'm leaving it off.
__________________
Is EA still bleeding cash like an executive doing an ED-209 demonstration.... - Grall |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,177
|
That's weird, because everything works fine for me until I enable morphological in the CCC, and then the text gets blurry. As soon as I disable MLAA, everything goes back to normal. I guess AMD need to have a app profile that disables MLAA for Firefox 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Oz Yak
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,528
|
Quote:
__________________
Is EA still bleeding cash like an executive doing an ED-209 demonstration.... - Grall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Entirely Suboptimal
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WI, USA
Posts: 6,867
|
I haven't seen the blur myself. I've used FF4 on a couple of modern Radeons , GeForce GTX 560 and 6150, and my Intel GMA 900 EeePC. I did notice that the fonts look a little different in both FF4 and IE9 compared to IE8 and FF3.x. I'm assuming font rendering has been changed with the new browsers. Safari also has its own font rendering look.
The EeePC is on XP and I'm sure it doesn't support the hardware acceleration so I think the fonts look like FF3.5. I think FF4 is excellent. It is noticeably faster than FF3.x on the Eee and I get to keep my autohiding bookmarks sidebar and the best fullscreen mode out there. Otherwise I'd have moved to Chrome, but FF4 feels as fast as Chrome to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 4,222
|
I've used Seamonkey 2.1 beta on a few computers, including a slow one (celeron at 600MHz). it's Firefox 4 with a old-style GUI, really good. (unless for the flash blocking extension not working)
I ran firefox 4 RC on the old machine too, ubuntu 10.10 but not the default desktop, I was confused at the looks - it didn't look like the windows version, which is a clone of Opera. not too much bothered I will use either browser depending on the mood or situation |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 445
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Now Officially a Top 10 Poster
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posts: 13,221
|
Starting to appreciate Firefox 4.0 more and more. It's a genuine speed-boost, with all the other advantages (almost flawless compatibility, where Opera/Chrome sometimes still have issues with some of our company sites).
But what I do really miss is the start-page. I can't find out how to set your new Tab window to show something like the frequently visited tiles you have in Opera, Chrome and Safari (and now also IE9 I think, but I can't run that on this laptop) |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 4,222
|
I'm liking it more as well
![]() it's excellent for > 10 year old computers as well as a lightweight VM. replacing the status bar with a tooltip on the bottom when mousing over a link is an excellent change. about the linux weirdness, I've found out that the menu bar is enabled by default (good thing as far as I'm concerned) and then the looks vary a lot because they're tied to the gtk theme. here ff4 looking very plain, but very clean : http://img847.imageshack.us/img847/4...1103290403.png using 131MB with eight tabs, which is decent enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,599
|
this is how I have mine.
http://img34.imageshack.us/f/68359086.png/ I didn't like FF4 initially, but it's growing on me. The only reason why I didn't like it, was because I've always had FF setup a certain way and FF4 forced me to reconfigure my top bars. After some configuration, it's pretty much how I had it before, but it takes up less space now with the new tab system and the fact that I can remove the bottom status bar because of the popup when you hover over a link. I have a flash downloader add-on that was in the status bar at the bottom, but FF4 lets me move that icon wherever I want, so I have it in the top right. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,078
|
Yeah I tried that but need the menu too often so I had more of a fiddle with customisation & came up with this:
![]() Edit: Since I just noticed, is now minus the Homepage icon.
__________________
But it's DOUBLE CONFIRMED |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,599
|
I used to put everything in the menu bar too, but in FF4, it makes that area semi-translucent because of the aero theme and a bit smaller. On my HTPC, it's a bit difficult to see, so I'm forced to use the navigation bar. I hardly use the menu bar anyway; the only thing I really used in the menu bar, was bookmarks, but I added a bookmark icon in the nav. bar.
With tabs on top, it puts them beside the orange firefox dropdown box so it barely takes up any space. Then by removing the status bar at the bottom, it gives me quite a bit more room. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,211
|
Hmmm, with the ability to put tabs on bottom (yay) it looks like you could make the UI look like IE 7/8. I may have to give that a try as IE 7/8 had the best browser UI I've ever used. Such a shame that IE 9 has such a horrible UI.
Regards, SB |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,235
|
Tried and now converted. Only concern I have with FF4 is memory problems...
Quote:
__________________
There is never a new thing at Microsoft. If you can't innovate you have to imitate... but it will never be as good as the originals. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|