Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 09-Sep-2009, 04:11   #1
RudeCurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,726
Icon Smile Replaced Spyware Doctor with Windows Defender

I just switched from one of the best anti spyware/malware programs to Windows Defender...why? Because it's free!

I don't know how good WD is but it can't be that bad can it? Anybody have any experience with WD? I kinda like it, it has a very simple interface.
RudeCurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2009, 04:24   #2
digitalwanderer
Dangerously Mirthful
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Winfield, IN USA
Posts: 15,292
Default

My only experience with it is disabling it on fresh installs.
digitalwanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2009, 04:24   #3
ShaidarHaran
hardware monkey
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,900
Default

Slap yourself.

Defender is a POS.

MBAM and Super Anti Spyware are the only anti-malware programs I'd ever bother with. AV I use Avira and MWAV.
ShaidarHaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2009, 04:35   #4
RudeCurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,726
Default

...after slapping myself a few times and banging my head against the wall, I just uninstalled it and downloaded MBAM and SAS.
RudeCurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2009, 08:43   #5
Grall
Invisible Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: La-la land
Posts: 4,985
Default

Windows defender is incredibly, amazingly, fantastically, abysmally slow at scanning.

I've no idea how effective it is at finding malware since I've not had any since.....ever, actually.

In fact, I do believe a C64 armed with a tape deck would scan files faster than windows defender does on my quadcore i7-powered, intel SLC solid state drive-equipped PC.
Grall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-Sep-2009, 01:24   #6
ShaidarHaran
hardware monkey
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,900
Default

lol, good move
ShaidarHaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-Sep-2009, 02:18   #7
FrameBuffer
Naughty Boy!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 499
Default

it must just be me but Ive found that MS Morro (Security Essentials) has not only been fast but finds a greater amount of mal/spyware threats with a lot less false positives than other alternatives. Was never a fan of Defender however MSE (beta) has performed flawlessly (so far).
FrameBuffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-Sep-2009, 05:32   #8
Grall
Invisible Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: La-la land
Posts: 4,985
Default

Never heard that name, is that their much-talked-about new virus killing software?

Regardless, I have a hard time believing a piece of MS software would perform better than the veterans of this niche of the software market. I doubt Eset and those people have much to worry about, at least in the short run.

Had this still been the early days of the 21st century MS would doubtlessly try to commandeer the virus scanner market like they did the browser market by bundling their - initially very crappy - solution, refine it iteratively, and when it performed well enough it would simply starve the competition to death.

Then when every other company had either been crushed or reduced to insignificance, they could stop throwing money and resources at developing their software and simply coast along for as long as possible...

However, lucky for us those days are now long gone. Governments and other organizations are aware of MS's tricks, and have already leafed through their dirty playbook. This won't work again; if MS attempts to bundle a virus scanner with their OSes they're going to get sued again.

Last edited by Grall; 12-Sep-2009 at 05:38.
Grall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-Sep-2009, 06:40   #9
RudeCurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,726
Default

MS purchased a couple of AV software companies awhile back.

http://news.cnet.com/Microsoft-to-bu...3-1015096.html

http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news...le.php/3469991
RudeCurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-Sep-2009, 17:52   #10
suryad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,454
Default

Ah so what is MBAM and SAS may I ask?
suryad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-Sep-2009, 02:21   #11
RudeCurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suryad View Post
Ah so what is MBAM and SAS may I ask?

http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php

http://www.superantispyware.com/
RudeCurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-Sep-2009, 05:26   #12
Mize
That's my stapler
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: "Midwest," USA
Posts: 3,949
Default

MBAM and SAS have recovered heavily infected machines (xp) that nothing else could. I personally run Linux clients and have a machine dedicated to running Untangle (also Playon for Netflix, Hulu and Amazon VOD for my consoles) and it seems to catch about everything for the wonderful price of free...if you have a machine that can dedicate a VM to a firewall.
__________________
"Yes windows 3.1 was better than the macOS of the day. All the Windows OS's have been better."
- eastmen
Mize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-Sep-2009, 08:02   #13
chavvdarrr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sofia, BG
Posts: 1,136
Default

In Spybot I believe and pray
__________________
"There are three types of lies - lies, damn lies, and statistics."
chavvdarrr is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.