[NotTarts]

Originally Posted by Rangers

But the gun model is just insaaane, look like CG

Ahahaha. Not quite.

[ultragpu]

Originally Posted by Rangers

Do you see the gun model?

I dunno if we're supposed to post pics but doubt it can harm, heres the other I know of

http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5...1111310503.png

Also supposedly is on DX9, high not very high, etc. Still looks unbelievable, though there is a little weakness in the apt buildings shit.

supposed hardware might be a 6970.

Yeah the gun model texture looks so out of place for being surrounded by the weak wall textures. But there's always very high setting right?

[NotTarts]

I have to say, though, that Temporal AA really helps for the bridge in the distance and the railing.

[L. Scofield]

Originally Posted by Rangers

Do you see the gun model?

I dunno if we're supposed to post pics but doubt it can harm, heres the other I know of

http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5...1111310503.png

Also supposedly is on DX9, high not very high, etc. Still looks unbelievable, though there is a little weakness in the apt buildings shit.

supposed hardware might be a 6970.

Damn, the lighting in that shot is fantastic.

[Neb]

Old leaked build? Also those walls might look like that becouse the SSAO is canceling out the mapping when covered by shadows. Though I was under the assumption CE3 would fix this but maybe for higher settings or it's just missing from this leak. Color texture is lowres though.

EDIT: It is old beta code. Dev build with missing data like textures/layers, map objects etc.

Originally Posted by Rangers

Do you see the gun model?

I dunno if we're supposed to post pics but doubt it can harm, heres the other I know of

Also supposedly is on DX9, high not very high, etc. Still looks unbelievable, though there is a little weakness in the apt buildings shit.

supposed hardware might be a 6970.

Debug info says 'Highspec' assuming no modification of base files though it is in DX9 so features might be off. Anyway why the heck does someone with a 6970 run it at 1280x1024 in DX9 mode with 32bit exe? Also DX9 runs worse than DX10+ going by logic below.

www6.incrysis.com/Light_Propagation_Volumes.pdf

It is important to note here that hardware capability to render into a volume texture tremendously improves performance of this technology in general. This dramatically simplifies shader workload since we do not need to emulate a trilinear filtering in the pixel shader. Instead the hardware unit is utilized and cache efficiency is highly improved due to the optimized memory layout of 3D texture. So it is possible to copy the final radiance information to volume texture on consoles or with the Microsoft DirectX® 10 API, but is not possible with the Microsoft DirectX® 9.0c API.

[Trejser]

Textures probably have higher options.

Crytek (?) released some new shots, obviously from 360 version

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=421468

[Rangers]

Is there a policy against posting media of the leak here?

I ask because here's a new YT I spotted on GAF. Seems GAF allows it anyway.



It's not particularly spoilerish or long or anything. Seems to be at probably medium settings or so, the guy only has GTX 460.

Others with the leak have said it has the best graphics they've ever seen :drool

Here's what the vid uploader said:

Crysis 2 PC Beta old build gameplay directx 9 and medium settings, some errors and missing textures.Without fraps 60+ FPS , with fraps 30 FPS. This is an old build, it is impossible to put on a maximum of an error and a lot of losses textures. This is not a complete game.

I am glad for Crytek's sake the leak is so buggy/incomplete.

He has another more spoilery vid too where the words "placeholder" actually appear in places in the game.

These type of graphics, on PC which is by nature unoptimized, on medium settings with old hardware, just make me shudder at how good next gen is going to look...

[messyman]

Originally Posted by ultragpu

http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/4...1111320081.png
Hm, doesn't look too impressive to be honest or it's a way old build.

Is the demo out?
The chopper seems to have some ghosting effect.

[Ruskie]

That footage looked amazing Although i did get a slight headache from all that motion blur.And yea...who said small levels and low poly count?

[KKRT]

There are 3 graphical settings in leaked build

Enthusiast
http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/9...1119485846.jpg
Hardcore
http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/8...1119492844.jpg
Gamer
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/1...1119504663.jpg

[Silent_Buddha]

You mislabeled the gamer and enthusiast. Unless Enthusiast is lowest spec when it should be highest. He fixed it...

Lowspec looks bad compared to Medium and Highspec. But even Lowspec looks better than quite a few games.

If the rays through the trees are realtime GI, that's going to look absolutely amazing in motion since the tree's should be animated.

On console it may have some competition for best console graphics due to lowered quality settings, but on PC, I can't imagine anything coming even close.

Regards,
SB

[DieH@rd]

Sad day for Crytek. Crysis 2 beta with unfinished january code has been leaked to the wild. Singleplayer is present. Expect heavy spoilers on the web in the following days. :-/

[Neb]

Videos out of leaked old dev build beta on PC. DX9, medium specs looks like the finest promoshots from Crytek. Dayyyuuum.

I'll only link to YT account. Beware of spoilers. He also says there is missing textures, lots of bugs/errors etc. Otherwise textures and mapping looks damn good, particles, has OBM though seems flaky etc.

EDIT: I'll remove link since other sites and EA is cleaning up. Short story is it looks amazing at anything from low and up and runs amazingly well. Long story is medium and especially high (and note that this is leaked beta dev build that only works in DX9) is eye-rapping me badly, especially high looks unbelievable. My Crysis with ultra config and TOD mod in DX10 suddenly looks average to me.

[Ruskie]

High Settings dx9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wC8cs...layer_embedded

OMG so much eye candy

You guys can say what you say but Crysis 2 in city to me already looks tons better than Jungle...tons better

[KKRT]

Originally Posted by Silent_Buddha

You mislabeled the gamer and enthusiast. Unless Enthusiast is lowest spec when it should be highest.

Yeah, You're right, i was writing settings names from memory and havent check links :P
Corrected.

[Neb]

Originally Posted by Silent_Buddha

You mislabeled the gamer and enthusiast. Unless Enthusiast is lowest spec when it should be highest.

Doesn't mather though as each pic has debug info stating mode.

Lowspec looks bad compared to Medium and Highspec. But even Lowspec looks better than quite a few games.

Yeah and look at the textures...

If the rays through the trees are realtime GI, that's going to look absolutely amazing in motion since the tree's should be animated.

And mind you this is DX9 mode, leaked old beta dev build and just high specs. From forums I've read very high cant be enabled as it bugs out and has tons of rendering bugs etc.

On console it may have some competition for best console graphics due to lowered quality settings, but on PC, I can't imagine anything coming even close.

Regards,
SB

Game will look sick on PC and consoles... dayyuuummmmm.

[swaaye]

Makes me want to dig out the Doom3 beta again. Or the HL2 beta... Or that Unreal 2 beta from way yonder. That Unreal Alpha was neat as well! And so was the Doom1 pre-release press alpha now that I think more about it all!!!

[Neb]

Originally Posted by Ruskie

High Settings dx9

OMG so much eye candy

You guys can say what you say but Crysis 2 in city to me already looks tons better than Jungle...tons better

QFT.

[Neb]

Originally Posted by DieH@rd

Sad day for Crytek. Crysis 2 beta with unfinished january code has been leaked to the wild. Singleplayer is present. Expect heavy spoilers on the web in the following days. :-/

Post showing low, medium and high settings in beta leak, DX9.

Video of Crysis 2 beta leak at medium settings, DX9.

Beta leak at high settings, DX9.

In console thread.

[Neb]

Originally Posted by DieH@rd

Sad day for Crytek. Crysis 2 beta with unfinished january code has been leaked to the wild. Singleplayer is present. Expect heavy spoilers on the web in the following days. :-/

Yeah I am going to avoid troll infested areas to not get spoilers up my face.

[Ruskie]

New one...oh my at that lighting and water reflection...oh my
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hus3p4RUEbA

**SPOLIERS in video**

[Silent_Buddha]

Avoiding all video. Don't want to risk hitting a spoiler.

It's a good thing it isn't a leak of Diablo 3 beta code. I think that's the only game that I wouldn't be able to resist downloading.

Regards,
SB

[Neb]

Wow even medium settings is eye-raping me.

[HollovVpo1nt]

Originally Posted by Ruskie

New one...oh my at that lighting and water reflection...oh my
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hus3p4RUEbA

**SPOLIERS in video**

Everything from animations to lighting made me think that the video was real-life capture/ movie. Superb.

[DieH@rd]

Originally Posted by Nebula

Beta leak at high settings, DX9.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=1622