Beyond3D Forum » Beyond3D Hall of Fame » Pre-release GPU Speculation » The NEXT LAST R600 Rumours & Speculation Thread

Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Page 139 of 223 « First 3989129130131132133134135136137138 139 140141142143144145146147148149189 Last »
Old 28-Apr-2007, 19:58   #3451
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
sorry let you guys waiting so long, the answer is:


11603, R600XT 745/828, C2D E6600 @ 3.6GHz



10855, 8800GTX 575/900, C2D E6600 @ 3.1GHz



XT AND GTX ARR ALL AT THEIRE DEFAULT CLOCK
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:05   #3452
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
NFS CARON 1280x1024, MAX Detail

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:08   #3453
bigtabs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TDO, Germany
Posts: 1,222
Default
God damn that game sucks.

What's it like in Test Drive Unlimited?
bigtabs is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:10   #3454
Brian118
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
Default
WTH!? Now the XT is doing better than a GTX?!
Brian118 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:10   #3455
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtabs View Post
God damn that game sucks.

What's it like in Test Drive Unlimited?
default clock,man, R600XT 745/828, anyone can provide default clock GTX NFS carbon score at 1280x1024 MAX detail?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:12   #3456
BlizzardOne
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West UK
Posts: 81
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian118 View Post
WTH!? Now the XT is doing better than a GTX?!
well, after such a long wait, i would bloody well hope so
BlizzardOne is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:12   #3457
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian118 View Post
WTH!? Now the XT is doing better than a GTX?!
default xt is doing better than default GTX in 01,03,05,06, but I don't know extreme oc result.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:16   #3458
Plano
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian118 View Post
WTH!? Now the XT is doing better than a GTX?!
Well in that test 2900XT is running on faster CPU.
Plano is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:17   #3459
Brian118
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
Default
But I was getting the impression that it was barely keeping up with the GTS...now this? Someone is going to be wrong and I hope it is not the chinese
Brian118 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:17   #3460
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plano View Post
Well in that test 2900XT is running on faster CPU.
yes, but would you pls compared SM2.0 and SM3.0 scores? thank you.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:20   #3461
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian118 View Post
But I was getting the impression that it was barely keeping up with the GTS...now this? Someone is going to be wrong and I hope it is not the chinese
All you guys here put dozen pages of suspicion on dailytech, oh, chinese must be the boss of Dailytech.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:23   #3462
BlizzardOne
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West UK
Posts: 81
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mao5 View Post
yes, but would you pls compared SM2.0 and SM3.0 scores? thank you.
assuming CPU speed has very little effect (i.e none)on the SM 2.0 and 3.0 scores;
the R600 XT scores very similarly as CF'd XTX's:

Code:
3DMark Score 11129 3DMarks 
 
SM 2.0 Score 4785 Marks (approx. -50 vs R600)
 
SM 3.0 Score 5445 Marks (approx. -100 vs R600)
 
CPU Score 2566 Marks
that's with a X6800 @ stock
BlizzardOne is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:24   #3463
Razor1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 2,680
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mao5 View Post
default clock,man, R600XT 745/828, anyone can provide default clock GTX NFS carbon score at 1280x1024 MAX detail?

75-80, I would like to know what drivers they used for those 3dmark scores, cause I'm getting around that GTX score right now and my CPU isn't overclocked.
Razor1 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:25   #3464
INKster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Io, lava pit number 12
Posts: 2,108
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian118 View Post
WTH!? Now the XT is doing better than a GTX?!
Look at the CPU speed.
The GTX is only using a Core 2 at 3.1GHz, versus 3.6GHz for the R600 XT.
Not exactly fair game...
INKster is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:26   #3465
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Icon Wink
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlizzardOne View Post
assuming CPU speed has very little effect (i.e none)on the SM 2.0 and 3.0 scores;
the R600 XT scores very similarly as CF'd XTX's:

Code:
3DMark Score 11129 3DMarks 
 
SM 2.0 Score 4785 Marks (approx. -50 vs R600)
 
SM 3.0 Score 5445 Marks (approx. -100 vs R600)
 
CPU Score 2566 Marks
that's with a X6800 @ stock
so dault GTX scores also similaryly as CF'd XTX?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:27   #3466
BlizzardOne
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West UK
Posts: 81
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mao5 View Post
so dault GTX scores also similaryly as CF'd XTX?
SM2.0, yes.. SM3.0, about 400-500 points behind..
BlizzardOne is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:28   #3467
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Icon Wink
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor1 View Post
75-80, I would like to know what drivers they used for those 3dmark scores, cause I'm getting around that GTX score right now and my CPU isn't overclocked.
sorry the tester is in sleep now, I'' ll ask him 8 hours later.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:30   #3468
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlizzardOne View Post
SM2.0, yes.. SM3.0, about 400-500 points behind..
CF XTX? what's XTX? R580 XTX? R600 XTX? Where did you get the scores? Weird.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:33   #3469
BlizzardOne
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West UK
Posts: 81
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mao5 View Post
CF XTX? what's XTX? R580 XTX? R600 XTX? Where did you get the scores? Weird.
CF'd X1950 XTX's + C2D X6800, it's my ststem i'm on atm all stock http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1697955
BlizzardOne is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:40   #3470
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Icon Smile
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlizzardOne View Post
CF'd X1950 XTX's + C2D X6800, it's my ststem i'm on atm all stock http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1697955
so this means you don't need to upgrade, unless you want a dx10 patch of Call of Jauze.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:47   #3471
BlizzardOne
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West UK
Posts: 81
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mao5 View Post
so this means you don't need to upgrade, unless you want a dx10 patch of Call of Jauze.
pretty much, power consumption, if rumors of ~225-230w are correct, put it on par with CF'd X1950's.. for roughly the same performance. so either way, in DX 9, no real difference.. unless AA/AF hit is significantly reduced, at significantly improved quality!

i'm actally rather curious as to whether replacing my dual X1950's with an R600 XT (X?) is worth it... only a few more days i guess
BlizzardOne is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:55   #3472
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlizzardOne View Post
pretty much, power consumption, if rumors of ~225-230w are correct, put it on par with CF'd X1950's.. for roughly the same performance. so either way, in DX 9, no real difference.. unless AA/AF hit is significantly reduced, at significantly improved quality!

i'm actally rather curious as to whether replacing my dual X1950's with an R600 XT (X?) is worth it... only a few more days i guess
worth it
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 20:56   #3473
Unknown Soldier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,176
Default
Now mao5, how will my QX6600 perform??

US
__________________
God put me on earth to do a certain number of things. Right now i'm so far behind that i'll never die.

Random 512Kb onboard -> S3 Virge 4MB -> RivaTNT2 -> GeforcePro -> GF3 -> NV3x -> R420 -> R580 -> G80 -> G92 -> 5870 -> ???
Unknown Soldier is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 21:01   #3474
mao5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
Now mao5, how will my QX6600 perform??

US
QX6800 in DT got 14005, What do you think?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindfury View Post
http://i56.tinypic.com/24wbm8w.jpg

nApoleon has indirectly confirmed it's real.
mao5 is offline  
Old 28-Apr-2007, 21:02   #3475
BlizzardOne
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West UK
Posts: 81
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mao5 View Post
worth it


my bank account is going to curse me for an eternity
BlizzardOne is offline  

 
Page 139 of 223 « First 3989129130131132133134135136137138 139 140141142143144145146147148149189 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:48.

Contact Us - Beyond3D - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.