If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Naughty Boy!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 817
|
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/News...x?NewsId=19383
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
ea_spouse is H4WT!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 53:4F:4E:59
Posts: 1,586
|
Sounds like a lot of hoopla for very little...
Personally I'd rather have Silicon Optix's scaler in my receiver or TV rather than in an HD-DVD player. Sitting in an HD-DVD player you're only going to get the benefit of great DVD upscaling. In a receiver or TV, you can apply it to more input sources. The mention of deep color basically to me means HDMI 1.3 (which means wider color space support/XvYCC support, which the PS3 also supports). Although the wider color gamut is only useful if your content is authored in it and your TV supports it. The RAMDAC stuff is largely inconsequential since it'll only be used for component, composite/s-video. Not really a big deal IMO if you're pimping the 1080p/HDMI aspects of the TV... So I'm not sure how this really raises the bar for HD-DVD...
__________________
"The sooner someone gets sued by Intel for violation, the sooner the patent can be revoked from orbit for gratuitous and wanton disregard for prior art and obviousness." ~TomF |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Naughty Boy!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 817
|
Anything that has built-in HQV processing is step up considering the outboard version costs thousands of dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 639
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Roberta E. Lee
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,455
|
Quote:
It can be quite nice to have depending on the scaler in your TV but really IMO, it's like Archie says, no big deal (or at least, not worth the $500 difference IMO) since upconverting is no where near the same as having source material in that greater resolution to begin with.
__________________
epicstruggle - "I would imagine that ty, created a fake account and post something he made on photoshop...Next time dont create a fake account to post something you created on your own." <--- Bwahahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
|
Wouldn't the top end displays have significantly better processors anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Roberta E. Lee
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,455
|
Possibly, I really have no idea just how good this particular one is. I would assume that ultra-highend outboard devices exist, much in the same way that some CD players are simply transports and the DA conversion is done by a different device altogether.
__________________
epicstruggle - "I would imagine that ty, created a fake account and post something he made on photoshop...Next time dont create a fake account to post something you created on your own." <--- Bwahahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,045
|
This is a top notch scaler. A crappy scaler = crappy picture. Someone on AVS is doing a SD DVD comparison tonight using this scaler vs. other high end external scalers. I'll link their feedback once I see it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
The top dogs have motion compensated processing in their best sets rather than motion adaptive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Roberta E. Lee
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,455
|
Oh goodness, yes. $2000 power cords anyone?
What's the difference?
__________________
epicstruggle - "I would imagine that ty, created a fake account and post something he made on photoshop...Next time dont create a fake account to post something you created on your own." <--- Bwahahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
|
Motion compensated has the potential for higher quality. It's also an order of magnitude more work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,045
|
A detailed test/comparison of the HD-XA2 with an ISF calibrator.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=782887 "What does this all mean? Well Toshiba has produced a phenomenal combination upscaling SD DVD player and HD DVD player. For the price it doesn't appear that anything can touch it. Certainly it puts ALL of the BR players to shame on upscaling alone--let alone its HD 1080p60 output. I have to congratulate Silicon Optix as well in their production of the ReonVX chip-- I believe it clearly beats the image produced by the Gennum VXP chip in the Crystallio II. Not good news for the external processor market if someone is primarly looking to display movies and not video/tv." |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Roberta E. Lee
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,455
|
Toshiba, get this in a TV please.
__________________
epicstruggle - "I would imagine that ty, created a fake account and post something he made on photoshop...Next time dont create a fake account to post something you created on your own." <--- Bwahahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 283
|
It seems like such a waste to put it in a player. What is there to scale and process if you can output 1080P24 and your source matches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,045
|
Think upscaled DVD's also.......which is the library for majority of people. Also, not many displays in the market support 1080p/24, they'll increase surely, but for now this is quite important for majority of the setups out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 639
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Naughty Boy!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 817
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
penguins
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,978
|
Q: Any idea how the scaler in the X360 compares?
__________________
Last edited by AlStrong; 28-Jan-2007 at 23:04. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
ea_spouse is H4WT!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 53:4F:4E:59
Posts: 1,586
|
Not even in the same class... Although to be fair, they're intended for different source domains....
__________________
"The sooner someone gets sued by Intel for violation, the sooner the patent can be revoked from orbit for gratuitous and wanton disregard for prior art and obviousness." ~TomF |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
|
Done a blind test?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
penguins
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,978
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 4,141
|
why care about expensive, specialised scaling shit?
what does that scaler crap that a $300 media PC can't do? |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Naughty Boy!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 817
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
ea_spouse is H4WT!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 53:4F:4E:59
Posts: 1,586
|
Well at $300, you're PC is going either not have much CPU to do much with Dscaler, or it's going to have a POS motherboard and case that you don't want it anywhere near your TV. With SD content a good 3GHz+ P4 working it's ass off w/Dscaler will get in the ballpark of early gen DCDi implementations, although DCDi processors tend to be able to lock on to fast motion objects better. DCDi is so old news and passé. Now everybody is into Silicon Optix and Gennum processors...
__________________
"The sooner someone gets sued by Intel for violation, the sooner the patent can be revoked from orbit for gratuitous and wanton disregard for prior art and obviousness." ~TomF |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Roberta E. Lee
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,455
|
Quote:
I'm not sure it's worth the $500 premium over the other Toshiba HD-DVD player though but as always YMMV. I thought you mentioned that 1080p is a red herring?
__________________
epicstruggle - "I would imagine that ty, created a fake account and post something he made on photoshop...Next time dont create a fake account to post something you created on your own." <--- Bwahahaha |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|