Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 06-Mar-2003, 22:39   #1
vandersl
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 7
Default Mr Glaskowski speaks again...

Just thought this was an interesting quote from this article, from the man himself

Quote:
Peter Glaskowsky, editor in chief of industry newsletter Microprocessor Report, agreed. "The long-term impact on (Nvidia) is pretty small," he said. "It usually takes screwing up two to three generations in a row for somebody's business to really deteriorate. Nvidia had a lot of problems with this generation, but I don't see the situation going beyond that."
Hmm...the Best Graphics Processor of 2002 is a screw-up, huh

P.S. I know screwing up launch execution doesn't really have any bearing on the technical merits of the GPU itself, but its still ironic.
vandersl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-Mar-2003, 23:07   #2
Nagorak
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 854
Default Re: Mr Glaskowski speaks again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by vandersl
Just thought this was an interesting quote from this article, from the man himself

Quote:
Peter Glaskowsky, editor in chief of industry newsletter Microprocessor Report, agreed. "The long-term impact on (Nvidia) is pretty small," he said. "It usually takes screwing up two to three generations in a row for somebody's business to really deteriorate. Nvidia had a lot of problems with this generation, but I don't see the situation going beyond that."
Hmm...the Best Graphics Processor of 2002 is a screw-up, huh

P.S. I know screwing up launch execution doesn't really have any bearing on the technical merits of the GPU itself, but its still ironic.
How do you figure it's the best GPU of 2002? First of all the Radeon 9700 is better than it. Secondly, it wasn't released in 2002 and to this day is still unavailable.
Nagorak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-Mar-2003, 23:11   #3
RussSchultz
Professional Malcontent
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: HTTP 404
Posts: 2,855
Default

You must have missed the discussion. Glaskowsky gave the NV30 that award. It was beaten to death in the other discussion ( http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewto...ght=glaskowsky).
RussSchultz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-Mar-2003, 23:14   #4
Psikotiko
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 192
Default Re: Mr Glaskowski speaks again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nagorak
Quote:
Originally Posted by vandersl
Just thought this was an interesting quote from this article, from the man himself

Quote:
Peter Glaskowsky, editor in chief of industry newsletter Microprocessor Report, agreed. "The long-term impact on (Nvidia) is pretty small," he said. "It usually takes screwing up two to three generations in a row for somebody's business to really deteriorate. Nvidia had a lot of problems with this generation, but I don't see the situation going beyond that."
Hmm...the Best Graphics Processor of 2002 is a screw-up, huh

P.S. I know screwing up launch execution doesn't really have any bearing on the technical merits of the GPU itself, but its still ironic.
How do you figure it's the best GPU of 2002? First of all the Radeon 9700 is better than it. Secondly, it wasn't released in 2002 and to this day is still unavailable.
Microprocessor Report gave the prize of the best GPU of 2002 to the Nv30. And now the editor said that it's a screw-up......
__________________
Code: 10001010111
Psikotiko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-Mar-2003, 23:17   #5
kyleb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,164
Default

i supose i should edit my picture to cut the strings on him then eh?




kyleb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-Mar-2003, 23:24   #6
Psikotiko
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyleb
i supose i should edit my picture to cut the strings on him then eh?




Where's AMD CEO???
__________________
Code: 10001010111
Psikotiko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-Mar-2003, 23:25   #7
Sabastian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 991
Default Re: Mr Glaskowski speaks again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psikotiko
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nagorak
Quote:
Originally Posted by vandersl
Just thought this was an interesting quote from this article, from the man himself

Quote:
Peter Glaskowsky, editor in chief of industry newsletter Microprocessor Report, agreed. "The long-term impact on (Nvidia) is pretty small," he said. "It usually takes screwing up two to three generations in a row for somebody's business to really deteriorate. Nvidia had a lot of problems with this generation, but I don't see the situation going beyond that."
Hmm...the Best Graphics Processor of 2002 is a screw-up, huh

P.S. I know screwing up launch execution doesn't really have any bearing on the technical merits of the GPU itself, but its still ironic.
How do you figure it's the best GPU of 2002? First of all the Radeon 9700 is better than it. Secondly, it wasn't released in 2002 and to this day is still unavailable.
Microprocessor Report gave the prize of the best GPU of 2002 to the Nv30. And now the editor said that it's a screw-up......
LOL, so now they are going to give it to ATi for the Radeon 9700? No they will take their payment from nvidia and write it off as a "screw up". Man they made total idiots of themselves for that one.
__________________
"No man knows how bad he is till he has tried very hard to be good"
C. S. Lewis
Sabastian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-Mar-2003, 23:54   #8
kyleb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psikotiko
Where's AMD CEO???
well at least the 64 seems reasonably deserving of the award it got, but i made that pic after he told all of us at nvnews that as it is his job he knows better than any of us hobbyists and yet failed to provide any factual basis for his position. i felt completely insulted by his comments and was compelled to formulate my own "1000 word" reply to the issue at hand.
kyleb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-Mar-2003, 00:24   #9
3dcgi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,019
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyleb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psikotiko
Where's AMD CEO???
well at least the 64 seems reasonably deserving of the award it got, but i made that pic after he told all of us at nvnews that as it is his job he knows better than any of us hobbyists and yet failed to provide any factual basis for his position. i felt completely insulted by his comments and was compelled to formulate my own "1000 word" reply to the issue at hand.
I think Athlon 64 or whatever variant is less deserving than GFFX. Not technically, but strictly because it won't be available for a while and a 2002 award should require the chip to at least be close to shipping.
3dcgi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-Mar-2003, 08:03   #10
kyleb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,164
Default

on those grounds i do have to agree 3dcgi. granted, the argument was that the technology was up and running and somehow qualified as "commercial availably" despite the fact that no consumer was able to lay their hands on either product in the year of the award. we never really did get a straight answer from about how that worked, but then again it is their award to make the rules for anyway. regardless, call me a softy if you like but, sense he has admitted the technology he so viminal backed for what it is, i figured i should make an effort to show my approval of his actions and cut the strings i once drew on him. so here is an optimistic future for nvidia and Peter Glaskowsky driving off the bmw he so openly cherishes.




kyleb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-Mar-2003, 04:04   #11
noko
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 502
Default

This is hilarious . The more he speaks the more in the hole he becomes. . .
noko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Mar-2003, 21:02   #12
K.I.L.E.R
Retarded moron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Posts: 2,949
Send a message via ICQ to K.I.L.E.R Send a message via AIM to K.I.L.E.R Send a message via MSN to K.I.L.E.R
Default

I have said before and I will say it again, he is a sold out hypocrite.
__________________
I eat coffee.
K.I.L.E.R is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gabe N. speaks @ DH T2k 3D & Semiconductor Industry 22 09-Dec-2003 01:00
Orson Scott Card speaks out on the War on Terror RussSchultz General Discussion 42 08-Nov-2003 18:19
Dell Speaks... Dave Baumann Beyond3D News 14 03-Jun-2003 14:35
Miyamoto Speaks Out at E3! Deepak Console Technology 3 17-May-2003 23:16
Dave Orton (ATI) speaks at Whistler conference: Joe DeFuria 3D & Semiconductor Industry 1 01-Mar-2003 02:38


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.