Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 22-Nov-2005, 23:55   #1
Bill
Naughty Boy!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 388
Default More pricing speculation. X360 loses $126?

http://www.businessweek.com/technolo...122_410710.htm

But dont get too excited PS3 ******s. They claim PS3 may cost $600 by todays standards!

This is indisputable proof of the importance of power by the way.

Power is worth losing billions of dollars on hardware for.

This article is major wonky though.

For instance, they claim Xbox1 only lost $23. That's WAYYYY low as everybody knows.

Also as someone at GAF pointed out, 65 for the RAM sounds awfully high as well. Almost like they are using retail prices.

Last edited by Bill; 23-Nov-2005 at 00:16.
Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 00:15   #2
Lord Darkblade
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
Default

Actually they claim the system could cost $600 to make, cell to be potentially around $159.

Its of course possible, however remember that Sony and IBM are making money elsewhere on the Cell chips so pushing these should quickly make the PS3 loses less for the companies where as MS have to shoulder the Xenon on their own.

The XBox may have only lost $23 to start with, its later in the gaming cycle with cost reductions that MS started to suffer, the price of many of their components was fixed so did not scale well with time, when you have a $150 console being made at $333 then you start to have a problem...
Lord Darkblade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 01:04   #3
DemoCoder
Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: California
Posts: 4,732
Default

Sony stands to make too much money from BluRay domination, which is driving all this. They will make money from every player sold, as well as from rereleased content from their studioes.
DemoCoder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 05:52   #4
mckmas8808
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DemoCoder
Sony stands to make too much money from BluRay domination, which is driving all this. They will make money from every player sold, as well as from rereleased content from their studioes.
DemoCoder I'm sorry, but this is one statement that we here at B3D can't understand. Of course I've been saying something like this for months so who knows.
mckmas8808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 07:17   #5
Platon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DemoCoder
Sony stands to make too much money from BluRay domination, which is driving all this. They will make money from every player sold, as well as from rereleased content from their studioes.
If BR becomes the standard...
Platon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 07:48   #6
mckmas8808
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platon
If BR becomes the standard...
Which it looks like it will. Who's gaining momentuem and who's losing it?
mckmas8808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 09:51   #7
Gholbine
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 294
Default

^^ ... HD-DVD had momentum?
Gholbine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 10:11   #8
Nesh
Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill

For instance, they claim Xbox1 only lost $23. That's WAYYYY low as everybody knows.
only $23?

That doesnt sound right.If that was the case they wouldnt have been making losses.One game per console sold would have been enough to cover the loss.
Nesh is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 13:53   #9
PiNkY
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 572
Default

Don't know what a Console maker receives in royalties for each game sale, but i doubt it being beyond 10$. 126$ per console seems way to high for me, as that would require quite a tie-in ratio (something like 20 games per console if you consider interest rates and capital costs) to ever be profitable...
PiNkY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Nov-2005, 14:42   #10
Shifty Geezer
Grumpy Mod
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a pretty pink padded cell
Posts: 26,011
Default

License takings at something like $10 per game printed, not sold. That increases earnings beyond game-sales. I think fo rthe initial console sales tie-in ratio has to be high to cover costs. Once the hardware becomes cheaper the software becomes profitable. That's why XB did so badly financially - they couldn't get the price down so software takings were too small to offset losses.
__________________
Shifty Geezer
...

Tolerance for internet moronism is exhausted. Anyone talking about people's attitudes in the Console fora, rather than games and technology, will feel my wrath. Read the FAQ to remind yourself how to behave and avoid unsightly incidents.
Shifty Geezer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.