Welcome, Unregistered.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
 |
24-Oct-2005, 09:57
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 134
|
ASUS Introduces World's First NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 Based Notebooks
http://www.asus.com/news_show.aspx?id=1513
looks like nvidia will launch new notebook chips today... any specs of geforce 7300go available yet? |
|
|
|
24-Oct-2005, 14:16
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 350
|
they've gone early
|
|
|
|
|
24-Oct-2005, 15:47
|
#3 |
|
Meh
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 9,809
|
Wow these must be the glory days for Nvidia PR. A far cry from the dark ages of the NV30.
|
|
|
|
|
24-Oct-2005, 18:08
|
#4 |
|
Mostly Harmless
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Uffda-land
Posts: 9,156
 |
Oh, I dunno, if I had to pick "word is our oyster" moments for NV it would be the acquistion of 3DFX and the launch of GF4.
"My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings! Look on my works ye mighty and despair!"
__________________
"We'll thrash them --absolutely thrash them."--Richard Huddy on Larrabee "Our multi-decade old 3D graphics rendering architecture that's based on a rasterization approach is no longer scalable and suitable for the demands of the future." --Pat Gelsinger, Intel ". . .its taking us longer than we would have liked to get a [Crossfire game] profiling system out there" --Terry Makedon, ATI, July 2006 "Christ, this is Beyond3D; just get rid of any f**ker talking about patterned chihuahuas! Can the dog write GLSL? No. Then it can f**k off." --Da Boss Last edited by Geo; 24-Oct-2005 at 18:10. |
|
|
|
|
24-Oct-2005, 18:10
|
#5 | |
|
KEPLER
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
This is from ForceWare 82.10 courtesy 3d-chipset.de
Quote:
__________________
People like you - Silent_Buddha laying an epic smackdown on XMAN26's double standards. So you're mixing apples and oranges to calculate grapes and then compare it to apples. - silent_guy's witty retort on sweeping comparisons. |
|
|
|
|
|
24-Oct-2005, 20:14
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,317
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
24-Oct-2005, 20:39
|
#7 | |
|
Meh
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 9,809
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 09:28
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 350
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 10:34
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,317
|
Ok, is that compared to the slowest 6200(dont remember if there more versions of the Go models)? Btw i assume this is one of the 90nm parts nVidia said would come H2/05 and the other are the integrated 6100/50 so it would seem they only have some "7600" type of card left.
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 11:26
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 350
|
The short answer is that I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 11:43
|
#11 |
|
Gamerscore Wh...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,948
|
I'm thinking that this is a similar configuration to NV44 but with the additional MADD's in the second ALU's.
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 14:59
|
#12 |
|
Gamerscore Wh...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,948
|
NVIDIA Site: 7300 Specs, 6200 Specs
I looks like a 50MHz clock increase (although those fill-rates are creative, that should be fragment rates by the looks of it) with the same PS & VS configuration - given that it was said to me to be "up to twice as fast" I would think my previous guess of the pipelines having G7x's extra MADD's to be the case. Given the increase, though, I wonder if this is 90nm or not. |
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 15:18
|
#13 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Posts: 523
|
According to Nvidia G72 is 90 nm. Same configuration as NV44 with 7800's pixel shader pipeline improvements.
Frequencies on Nvidia's webiste are misleading (they wrote the 6200 128 Mo frequency instead of the 6200 TC frequency). GeForce 6200 TC 64 Mo : 350 / 275 GeForce Go 7300 TC 64 Mo : 350 / 300 40% improvement is Nvidia's figure. Not close to the reality as far as I know.
__________________
Damien Triolet - HardWare.fr Sorry for my bad English. Maybe one day it'll be better :D Last edited by Tridam; 25-Oct-2005 at 15:20. |
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 15:28
|
#14 |
|
Gamerscore Wh...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,948
|
Well, I suppose they may be opting for a different power/heat envolope, but I'm surprised that clocks aren't increasing for a 90nm part. I wonder what foundry/process they are using.
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 15:55
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 350
|
TSMC 90nm Low-k - same as the NForce 410/430 GeForce 6100/6150 AFAIK.
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 16:05
|
#16 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Posts: 523
|
Nvidia's website :
Quote:
__________________
Damien Triolet - HardWare.fr Sorry for my bad English. Maybe one day it'll be better :D Last edited by Tridam; 25-Oct-2005 at 16:16. |
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 19:32
|
#17 | |
|
KEPLER
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
Quote:
__________________
People like you - Silent_Buddha laying an epic smackdown on XMAN26's double standards. So you're mixing apples and oranges to calculate grapes and then compare it to apples. - silent_guy's witty retort on sweeping comparisons. |
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 20:15
|
#18 | |
|
Off-season
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: On the pursuit of happiness
Posts: 3,019
|
Quote:
__________________
Binary prefixes for bits and bytes |
|
|
|
|
|
25-Oct-2005, 20:22
|
#19 | |
|
KEPLER
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
Quote:
 (or atleast offer comparable performance)
__________________
People like you - Silent_Buddha laying an epic smackdown on XMAN26's double standards. So you're mixing apples and oranges to calculate grapes and then compare it to apples. - silent_guy's witty retort on sweeping comparisons. |
|
|
|
|
|
26-Oct-2005, 12:50
|
#20 |
|
Stealth Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sunny Melbourne
Posts: 1,112
|
Can we draw any conclusions from this as to the desktop G72? I vaguely remember someone suggesting desktop and mobile numbering wouldn't be comparable this time round, but my mind may be playing tricks on me.
__________________
Human Rights [X---------|----------] Robert Menzies |
|
|
|
|
26-Oct-2005, 15:55
|
#21 | |
|
Off-season
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: On the pursuit of happiness
Posts: 3,019
|
Quote:
__________________
Binary prefixes for bits and bytes |
|
|
|
|
|
26-Oct-2005, 15:59
|
#22 | |
|
KEPLER
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
Quote:
7300 versus X1300 Pro 7300 TC versus X1300 HM But Tim's suggesting that 7300 as whole isnt 40% faster than 6200, so ..
__________________
People like you - Silent_Buddha laying an epic smackdown on XMAN26's double standards. So you're mixing apples and oranges to calculate grapes and then compare it to apples. - silent_guy's witty retort on sweeping comparisons. |
|
|
|
|
|
27-Oct-2005, 11:35
|
#23 | |
|
Off-season
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: On the pursuit of happiness
Posts: 3,019
|
Quote:
__________________
Binary prefixes for bits and bytes |
|
|
|
|
|
27-Oct-2005, 12:01
|
#24 | |
|
KEPLER
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
Quote:
__________________
People like you - Silent_Buddha laying an epic smackdown on XMAN26's double standards. So you're mixing apples and oranges to calculate grapes and then compare it to apples. - silent_guy's witty retort on sweeping comparisons. |
|
|
|
|
|
27-Oct-2005, 12:45
|
#25 |
|
Off-season
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: On the pursuit of happiness
Posts: 3,019
|
"it" = the Go 7300 this thread is about.
__________________
Binary prefixes for bits and bytes |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:38.
