Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 16-Apr-2005, 10:17   #1
Tahir2
Itchy
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: United Queendom
Posts: 2,858
Default RS480 chipset

This motherboard chipset design from ATI has an integrated X300 onboard which is based on the 9600 GPU.

Does this integrated GPU have explicit support for HDTV resolutions like 1280*720P/768P and 1920*1080i?
__________________
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so - Douglas Adams
Tahir2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-Apr-2005, 17:32   #2
kyleb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,164
Default

Why wouldn't it?
kyleb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-Apr-2005, 21:22   #3
ANova
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,226
Default

The X300 is a PCIE 9200 part, not 9600, that's the X600.

Yes, it supports resolutions up to 2048x2048.
ANova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-Apr-2005, 21:24   #4
Dave Baumann
Gamerscore Wh...
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,947
Default

9200 is R200, DX8.1 based. RS400/480 are derived from X300/9600 in that they use the same DX9 architecture, but have half the pipelines.
__________________
Expand. Accelerate. Dominate.
Tweet Tweet!
Dave Baumann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-Apr-2005, 21:33   #5
ANova
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveBaumann
9200 is R200, DX8.1 based. RS400/480 are derived from X300/9600 in that they use the same DX9 architecture, but have half the pipelines.
So the X300 is a DX9 part with 2 or 4 pipelines? Isn't performance comparable to the 9200?
ANova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-Apr-2005, 22:17   #6
Zaphod
Remember
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,031
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ANova
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveBaumann
9200 is R200, DX8.1 based. RS400/480 are derived from X300/9600 in that they use the same DX9 architecture, but have half the pipelines.
So the X300 is a DX9 part with 2 or 4 pipelines? Isn't performance comparable to the 9200?
It (X300) is basically a die-shrunk, PCI Express, Radeon 9600. Most often (as far as I have seen) found with a 64bit bus and low clocks, so not exactly a speed demon. Nothing wrong with it, though. At the same clock a 128bit X300 shouldn't perform any worse than a X600. What Dave is saying is that the RS400/480 are more like half a X300.
Zaphod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-Apr-2005, 02:46   #7
Pete
Moderate Nuisance
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,653
Default

X300 is a 110nm X600, which in turn is simply a PCIe 9600 (which is a 130nm low-k RV350/360). All have four pixel pipes and two vertex shaders. I'm pretty sure the X300 also has a 128-bit bus, but it's most often sold as a 64-bit X300SE.

IIRC, the RS480's graphics core is less than half of an X300/X600/9600, in that it has only two pipelines and no hardware vertex shaders (to save die size). I guess its memory bus is 64-bit, as I think that's the dual-channel system memory bus width.

As for HDTV support, it should be able to output any res under its cap, like most video cards. In the unlikely event ATI doesn't provide one of those HDTV resolutions, you can always add it by hand or with PowerStrip.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-Apr-2005, 19:01   #8
Tahir2
Itchy
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: United Queendom
Posts: 2,858
Default

Quote:
In the unlikely event ATI doesn't provide one of those HDTV resolutions, you can always add it by hand or with PowerStrip.
Thanks for that, I just want to be sure before I start experimenting with a HTPC. Overscan becomes a problem as well when hooking up to HDTV type resolutions which is something the driver needs to take care of I assume.
__________________
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so - Douglas Adams
Tahir2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-Apr-2005, 20:13   #9
Pete
Moderate Nuisance
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,653
Default

That sounds right, but I have no idea.

I'd shoot ATI an email about the res and overscan. It shouldn't take them too long to provide a definitive answer.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Chipset Review Dave Baumann Beyond3D Articles 27 26-Nov-2004 00:17
ATI Delivers Integrated DX9 Graphics Chipset for AMD 64 Plat Dave Baumann Press Releases 0 09-Nov-2004 11:49
Any new info on the ATI RS480 and RX480 chipset? {Sniping}Waste 3D Architectures & Chips 4 03-Nov-2004 18:20
Intel Pentium 4 Faster System Bus And New Chipset Dave Baumann Press Releases 0 14-Apr-2003 15:50
Graphics Companies (Integrated) Chipset News Dave Baumann Beyond3D News 4 20-Mar-2003 22:49


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.