Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 18-Jul-2002, 19:06   #1
pascal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brasil
Posts: 1,790
Default How much better is the R300 image quality?

People talked a lot about numbers and benchmarks, but what I would like to know is how much better is the R300 image quality with games?

Anyone have seen any comparison?
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-2002, 19:12   #3
Dave Baumann
Gamerscore Wh...
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,946
Default

Hardocp has a gaming review and this comment stuck out out me:

http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MzMw

Quote:
Quake 3 on the Radeon 9700 was simply heaven and stopping play long enough to look around showed off the Quake 3 maps’ textures and other visuals like I think the guys at id wanted them to be seen three years ago.
Althought thats only really talking about texturing performance I think it shows that the advancments in the pipelines can make a difference just in texturing. To see some of the other advances we'll have to be looking at pretty complex games and indepth reviews!

ATI had some screen shots of the car showing what the pipeline can do with high precision FP as opposeed to 32bit integer. That HardOCP piece is worth a read though.
__________________
Expand. Accelerate. Dominate.
Tweet Tweet!
Dave Baumann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-2002, 19:43   #4
mboeller
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 845
Default

When You look at page 9 from tomshardware preview, then it seems
the R300 uses (up to) 6x RGMS. Could this be true? This would explain
some of the outstanding image quality the sites report.

http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/...on9700-09.html
mboeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-2002, 20:54   #5
Bambers
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 781
Default

According to all the ati demos its some sort of non ordered AA. Its programable though so could be RGAA or any other pattern. It also says multissampling can be combined with different amounts of supersampling. It will be interesting to see if this is in the final drivers.
Bambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-Jul-2002, 03:49   #6
pascal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brasil
Posts: 1,790
Default

Some UT2003 image quality tests in a few weeks could be nice.

Anyway, I think ATI really want my money 8)
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-Jul-2002, 04:21   #7
OpenGL guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,291
Send a message via ICQ to OpenGL guy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mboeller
When You look at page 9 from tomshardware preview, then it seems
the R300 uses (up to) 6x RGMS. Could this be true? This would explain
some of the outstanding image quality the sites report.
Up to 6 sample is correct. It looks quite nice
OpenGL guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-Jul-2002, 05:12   #8
ben6
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 863
Default

It was a cool show, OpenGL guy were you there?
ben6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nvidia Det51.75 lower Image Quality makes performance gains? Sabastian 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices 18 06-Oct-2003 17:08
AquaMark 3 Image Quality Comparison Matt 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices 4 29-Sep-2003 06:25
A look at IQ at Firingsquad... WaltC 3D & Semiconductor Industry 128 05-Sep-2003 13:49
Doom3 benches revisited. jjayb 3D Architectures & Chips 113 22-May-2003 15:08
AccuView Quincunx Image Quality aths General 3D Technology 24 28-Feb-2002 00:25


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.