Welcome, Unregistered.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
 |
01-Oct-2004, 20:26
|
#101 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 30
|
I was under the impression that the 3dmark fix was for manually inflating the scores (cheating). Maybe I am wrong though.
|
|
|
|
02-Oct-2004, 00:31
|
#102 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 2,680
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-Oct-2004, 01:07
|
#103 |
|
Old Fart
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida USA
Posts: 2,065
|
There were no changes to either my 6800 GT or my X800.......
__________________
I love Bush.......the pussy, not the President! |
|
|
|
|
02-Oct-2004, 13:59
|
#104 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-Oct-2004, 22:03
|
#105 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,454
|
Hey guys I got a very noob question for ya. So I got the Omega version of the Cat 4.10 drivers and I ran it on my laptop...and I got a 2660 and keep getting the same score with a delta of 30-40 points at the most. THis is with DirectX and OpenGL settings in the control panel to application preferences and the texture and mipmap etc settings to high quality. My score is based on a non-oced grphx card. I was under the impression that there is AI and such in this version of the driver.
--Is that correct? --If that is correct then how do I use the AI optimizations? Is it thru the registry hacks you guys are talking about? --Another question is that I was under the impression the drivers were increasing performance of ATI cards with 256 mb of memory anywhere from 300-1200 points in 3dmark. How come I did not gain any performance improvements considering I have a Mobility Radeon 9800 Pro in my laptop with 256 mb of memory? -- Does it have anything to do with the hotfix from 3dmark that prevents inflated scores? I think not but I could be wrong... Well those are all the questions I have as of now. I was expecting with the new drivers to get a 300+ point increase so I could hit the 3k barrier  thanks a lot
|
|
|
|
|
03-Oct-2004, 03:23
|
#106 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,454
|
More details on my score, what do you guys think?
3DMark Score 2660 3DMarks GT1 - Return To Proxycon 12.3 FPS GT2 - Firefly Forest 7.4 FPS GT3 - Canyon Flight 13.2 FPS CPU Score 4153 CPUMarks CPU Test 1 2.2 FPS CPU Test 2 3.5 FPS Fill Rate - Single-Texturing 1569.4 MTexels/s Fill Rate - Multi-Texturing 2800.1 MTexels/s Pixel Shader 51.6 FPS Vertex Shader - Simple 34.6 MVertices/s Vertex Shader - Complex 32.3 MVertices/s 8 Triangles 6.6 MTriangles/s 32 Triangles 26.1 MTriangles/s 128 Triangles 102.1 MTriangles/s 512 Triangles 106.8 MTriangles/s 2048 Triangles 108.8 MTriangles/s 32768 Triangles 109.4 MTriangles/s |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ATI Mobility M1 Drivers | aaronbond | 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices | 5 | 13-May-2005 06:21 |
| Futuremark's First Monthly Media Newsletter Is Here! | digitalwanderer | 3D & Semiconductor Industry | 52 | 18-Mar-2004 07:16 |
| Futuremark lied! So dont trust it. | jerry_enCater | 3D Architectures & Chips | 48 | 25-May-2003 09:08 |
| ATi responses challenge of NV30 with R350 | Zephyr | 3D Architectures & Chips | 153 | 03-Oct-2002 13:57 |
| ATI IGP 320, IGP 320M, IGP 330, IGP 330M, IXP 200, XP 250 | Dave Baumann | Press Releases | 0 | 13-Mar-2002 14:56 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50.
