If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
|
|
#76 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 727
|
Quote:
I've seen Linus's 3dvision benchies he says GTX680 is basically 2xfaster than GTX580 there, not sure how reliable this guy's testings so take it with salt
__________________
SiS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460 Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 407
|
Thanks a bunch guys.
The 7970s do seem to have a bit better scaling in dual gpu mode, thus making the 10% advantage the 680 has in single gpu mode, less significant. Still great performance from both sides. As for 3Dvision, the video was quite informative. I don't see anything that implies that Kepler receives any less of a performance hit across the board, except in the case of Batman, which was quite less on Kepler. In Skyrim though the Kepler card receive a much higher performance hit. So it's a tie I guess. What matters to me, is that I will probably need something like a 670 SLI in order to play games at 3dvision 1080P, vsynced at 60fps per eye. Just out of curiosity though, the guy in the video says that Crysis 2 was designed with stereoscopic 3D in mind, so it does not bring so much performance hit in 3dvision mode. What exactly is that, which makes Crysis 2 not bring so much performance hit? I mean it still renders everything twice, doesn't it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TDO, Germany
Posts: 1,222
|
No it doesn't - it uses the z-buffer for reprojection. Aside from it's great performance, the 3D in Crysis 2 is aesthetically very poor compared to the regular driver hack 3D we're used to. There is a thread on the tech here.
Stereo gaming is the main reason I'm seriously considering one of these cards. Was especially nice to see the massive Skyrim performance compared to what I get with my 470GTX, so thanks for the link to the Linus video.
__________________
Trade Steam games with other B3D members |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,440
|
The tech report review has updated some. Scott added some info on GPU Boost: http://techreport.com/articles.x/22653/3
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Invisible Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: La-la land
Posts: 4,985
|
Nvidia-exclusive partner Galaxy is readying a single-slot GTX 680 card, equipped with a thin blower cooler that might be based on a vapor chamber, considering how lean it is.
No details are available right now on things like clock speeds (in case they had to nerf the GPU to not overcook it), noise levels, video output configuration, release date or price. It looks very intriguing though with a single-slot design. It would be a real boon for a micro-ATX system like mine to get access to all 4 cardslots. I'm a bit wary of the potential noise such a thin blower could make though, I can imagine that fan would have to spin hellishly fast to pump enough air... Also, I'm curious how video outputs would co-exist with hot air exhaust in just one cardslot's worth of space. Maybe the cooler simply dumps all hot air into the case in order to make room for ports on the rear bracket.
__________________
"If I were a science teacher and a student said the Universe is 6000 years old, I would mark that answer as wrong (why? Because it is)." -Phil Plait |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
"Well, you mentioned Disneyland, I thought of this porn site, and then bam! A blue Hulk." —The Creature My (currently dormant) blog: Teχlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
yes, i'm drunk
|
To put the card in some perspective, Galaxy released GTX 460 with single slot too, at Guru3D's review it was as loud as GTX 480, rated at 45dBA (for some reference, 6970 & GTX 570 SLI was rated at 42dBA) - and 460 is notably less power hungry than 680 is.
They failed to deliver the planned single slot GTX 470 apparently.
__________________
I'm nothing but a shattered soul... Been ravaged by the chaotic beauty... Ruined by the unreal temptations... I was betrayed by my own beliefs... |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 727
|
some crazy non ref cards
Palit GTX680 +50% Power boost http://www.hardwareheaven.com/review...overclock.html http://www.techpowerup.com/163230/Pa...-Pictured.html http://www.techpowerup.com/163236/Pa...-Official.html Zotac GTX680 the early called 2GHz card? lol http://www.techpowerup.com/163231/ZO...-Pictured.html Gainward Phantom GTX680 http://www.techpowerup.com/163241/Ga...-Launched.html
__________________
SiS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460 Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650 Last edited by Man from Atlantis; 29-Mar-2012 at 11:58. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
yes, i'm drunk
|
The "2GHz card" is likely lost in translation, meaning they're planning to reach 2GHz on LN2 or liquid helium cooling, opposed to current record of 1.9GHz on reference (with beefed pwm)
__________________
I'm nothing but a shattered soul... Been ravaged by the chaotic beauty... Ruined by the unreal temptations... I was betrayed by my own beliefs... |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Invisible Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: La-la land
Posts: 4,985
|
Very strange shroud design on that Palit card. It caps way too tightly around the sides IMO and does not seem to allow adequate ventilation for the large center fan in particular.
__________________
"If I were a science teacher and a student said the Universe is 6000 years old, I would mark that answer as wrong (why? Because it is)." -Phil Plait |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Eric the Half-a-bee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The cat detector van from the Ministry of Housinge
Posts: 2,050
|
Wow this is hard to get in Norway. Only one e-tailer has some in stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Invisible Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: La-la land
Posts: 4,985
|
TSMC seems to be significantly supply-constrained on their 28nm process, that's probably why.
Also, Nvidia published a somewhat alarming report, where they project that the $/transistor will hardly move downwards at all for 20nm and 14nm compared to 28nm, meaning the future development of GPUs could basically plateau unless prices increase massively for graphics cards.
__________________
"If I were a science teacher and a student said the Universe is 6000 years old, I would mark that answer as wrong (why? Because it is)." -Phil Plait |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 727
|
Metro 2033 such a memory bandwidth monster
GTX 680 is actually reacts clock speed very nicely oppose to one might think, from 1006MHz to 1300Mhz it should be +30%.. but boost clock is 1100MHz and it actually is just +18% oc over the default.. ________ 3-Way SLi Review http://www.4gamer.net/games/120/G012093/20120330042/
__________________
SiS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460 Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650 Last edited by Man from Atlantis; 30-Mar-2012 at 19:57. |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,440
|
http://techreport.com/articles.x/22735/5 Info on the shortages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,87...fikkarte/Test/
__________________
English is not my native tongue. Before flaming please consider the possiblity that I did not mean to say what you might have read from my posts. Work| RecreationWarning! This posting may contain unhealthy doses of gross humor, sarcastic remarks and exaggeration! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 727
|
Quote:
__________________
SiS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460 Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Red-headed step child
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Guess ;)
Posts: 3,084
|
I'm pretty convinced that NV 680 has some under-volting headroom somewhat akin to AMD's 7900 series. The Sapphire 7970 that I bought uses a 1000Mhz core speed at slightly less than stock volts to provide a similar result -- more clock, less power draw than reference.
__________________
"...twisting my words" |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 727
|
Zotac GTX680 Supreme Edition review.. the card is pure awesomeness, it allows 1.5V and hit 1.40+ GHz on air, also there is an OTP switch if there will be any fullcover water block in futere it may reach 1.5GHz
![]() http://en.expreview.com/2012/04/08/z...iew/22203.html
__________________
SiS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460 Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650 |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Senior Member
|
1.5V on 28nm sounds like a great way to kill a chip.
__________________
"Well, you mentioned Disneyland, I thought of this porn site, and then bam! A blue Hulk." —The Creature My (currently dormant) blog: Teχlog |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Invisible Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: La-la land
Posts: 4,985
|
Yeah, sounds really high volts. If it is not killed outright, then over time through electro-migration...
__________________
"If I were a science teacher and a student said the Universe is 6000 years old, I would mark that answer as wrong (why? Because it is)." -Phil Plait |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Eric the Half-a-bee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The cat detector van from the Ministry of Housinge
Posts: 2,050
|
I ordered the plain EVGA version. Stop talking about these crazy clocked versions!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,682
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 727
|
Palit JetStream reviews
http://www.guru3d.com/article/palit-...ream-review/25 http://www.4gamer.net/games/120/G012093/20120411073/
__________________
SiS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460 Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650 Last edited by Man from Atlantis; 13-Apr-2012 at 13:23. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|