Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 11-Mar-2012, 19:35   #301
MJP
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 432
Default

There are tons of ways to handle real-time GI, especially if you're targeting "next-gen" hardware specs. The question is how well it stands up to pre-baked GI in terms of quality (usually the answer is "not so well"), and how much runtime performance cost it has.
__________________
The Blog | The Book
MJP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-Mar-2012, 19:38   #302
Silent_Buddha
Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ultragpu View Post
Sounds like UE4 is a whole generation leap over Samaritan if Rein is to be believed.
Well, considering the bump in version number, I'd say it's a given. UE -> UE2 -> UE3 were all quite large generational leaps.

If it weren't for the fact that Tim Sweeney is the brains behind this, I likely wouldn't give Mark Rein's (a very good marketeer) words much credit. But Tim Sweeney is a pretty savvy engine designer who always seems to be fairly in touch with the direction hardware is going. A bit of a different approach to Carmack who tends to try to funnel hardware into his vision of future 3D rendering.

As well, having Dx11 presumably as a baseline should make for some potentially fantastic results. In other words designing around Dx11 from the start rather than designing around Dx9 and trying to then add or port it to Dx11.

Regards,
SB
Silent_Buddha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-Mar-2012, 22:22   #303
homerdog
hardly a Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: still camping with a mauler
Posts: 3,676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJP View Post
There are tons of ways to handle real-time GI, especially if you're targeting "next-gen" hardware specs. The question is how well it stands up to pre-baked GI in terms of quality (usually the answer is "not so well"), and how much runtime performance cost it has.
Well if you want GI with highly destructible environments, baked is not an option.
If the environment is mostly static and you can make a lot of assumptions about the nature of ambient light in a given area, hybrid approaches like Far Cry 3's make more sense.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humus View Post
Releasing a game in 2010 without AA is a completely foreign concept to me. If the technique you're using makes it impossible to use AA then you're using the wrong techniques. As simple as that. Releasing a PC game without AA options is OK only if that means you can only have it enabled[...]
homerdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-Mar-2012, 10:50   #304
MfA
Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,321
Send a message via ICQ to MfA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent_Buddha View Post
As well, having Dx11 presumably as a baseline should make for some potentially fantastic results. In other words designing around Dx11 from the start rather than designing around Dx9 and trying to then add or port it to Dx11.
They have never really tried the latter, they added as little as they could get away with as poorly as they could get away with ... no bigger force against DX11 adoption than Epic IMO.
__________________
Cinematic is the new streamlined.
MfA is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.