If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
|
|
#951 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#952 |
|
Naughty Boy!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,980
|
I was going through the lists & noticed that its incorrect about GTA4 (PS3) having QAA & ME2 having the 'selective' UE3 2*MSAA [atleast the DF article agrees that AA is completely turned off in ME2]
__________________
wookies love cookies ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#953 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 681
|
The recent DF face off article said that QAA is in GTA4 and the expansions, though it's effect is fairly limited.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/di...nd-25-face-off |
|
|
|
|
|
#954 | |
|
penguins
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,978
|
Quote:
QAA does exist in GTA4.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#955 |
|
Naughty Boy!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,980
|
GTA4 or GTA4:episodes ?
Cause IIRC GTA4 didn't had any sort of AA whatsoever...Episodes dues feature QAA though.
__________________
wookies love cookies ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#956 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Thornaby
Posts: 876
|
MazingerDude is hinting the PS3 version is sub HD, maybe as low as 540p. I wouldn't mind the same res as GTA4 as it seems the framerate is much more solid and image quality is improved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#957 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Thornaby
Posts: 876
|
Now saying it maybe 640p, same as GTA4, I'd be happy with that if the other improvements prove true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#958 |
|
Naughty Boy!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,980
|
I'd be perfectly fine with 640p if I get some AA & a smooth framerate...not a similar case with 540p though.
EDIT: Wow, this looks so good: http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/510...0516183425.jpg That's a framebuffer grab from 360 ver, compare that to this offscreen shot from PS3 ver: http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/6752/1050030.jpg or this: http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/3924/1050027.jpg
__________________
wookies love cookies ! Last edited by nightshade; 16-May-2010 at 11:09. |
|
|
|
|
|
#959 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Thornaby
Posts: 876
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#960 | |
|
Naughty Boy!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,980
|
Quote:
Btw MazingerDude says that R* never released a bullshot for RDR....so all those amazing screenshots were frame grabs
__________________
wookies love cookies ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#961 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,283
|
Quote:
Anyway,played 360 version of the game for about an hour or so and game is simply an visual achievement...you will have to look hard to find better looking game on consoles(couple of exclusives),and other open world games dont even compare...Texture quality is almost mindblowing for open world game and the detail they put in it is very impressive... I also havent notice jaggies or significant frame drops,its very smooth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#962 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 619
|
So PS3 version is 540p confirmed? Huge step back from 640p...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#963 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Thornaby
Posts: 876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#964 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,855
|
How can you say it's a "huge step back" without seeing the final game? Perhaps the game looks better overall at 540p with added visual effects than it would at 640p without some (or all) of those effects? Why do some of you seem to oversimplify things, when any sensible person should know it's a complicated balancing act?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#965 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,567
|
http://www.abload.de/img/red_dead_redemption_ren9bz.jpg
http://miladesn.webs.com/Red_Dead_Re...Xbox_360_5.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/red_dead_redemption_rek764.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/red_dead_redemption_rec5el.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/red_dead_redemption_rey5dd.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/red_dead_redemption_recu59.jpg Fixed: very hard to me to understand the real resolution...it seems there is an improvement...but QAA complicated the impressions. Last edited by AlStrong; 18-May-2010 at 13:11. Reason: url tags... |
|
|
|
|
|
#966 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 833
|
X0
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/510...0516183425.jpg PS3 http://i41.tinypic.com/2q1yu1j.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/imv3o7.jpg Second one shows exacly that its not 720p. |
|
|
|
|
|
#967 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,567
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#968 |
|
penguins
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,978
|
640 vertical
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#969 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#970 |
|
penguins
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,978
|
Haven't found any good edges to examine the horizontal res. Anyways, if by "#p" you mean a 16:9 pixel resolution, you'll not get a whole number horizontal with 640 vertical.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#971 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,056
|
OK, but the total number of pixels in GTA4 is equivalent to 640p? Or no? What would you expect the horizontal to be if the vertical is 640? Same as GTA4? PS. You're certain on the 640 vertical?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#972 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: France
Posts: 914
|
yes 640p like GTA4
horizontal seem the same than GTA4 too Last edited by Quaz51; 18-May-2010 at 14:37. |
|
|
|
|
|
#973 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: France
Posts: 914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#974 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#975 |
|
Now Officially a Top 10 Poster
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posts: 12,890
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|