Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 02-Mar-2010, 19:14   #26
swaaye
Entirely Suboptimal
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WI, USA
Posts: 6,868
Default

Sure but the future is more effects, not faster with yesterday's effects. The results for DX11 games show that the current high end cards are the only choice if you want to play with DX11 at any sort of high resolution. I imagine that in a year the current midrange cards will be reminiscent of the first midrange DX10 cards that everyone has forgotten outside of notebooks.

Last edited by swaaye; 02-Mar-2010 at 19:21.
swaaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-Mar-2010, 05:09   #27
Silent_Buddha
Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swaaye View Post
Sure but the future is more effects, not faster with yesterday's effects. The results for DX11 games show that the current high end cards are the only choice if you want to play with DX11 at any sort of high resolution. I imagine that in a year the current midrange cards will be reminiscent of the first midrange DX10 cards that everyone has forgotten outside of notebooks.
Well considering I doubt anyone with a 30" monitor will be looking at a 57xx or 250 class card...

I think the predominat demographic for this card is likely to have a 22" or lower monitor with a res of 1680x1050 or lower.

As well as Dx11 gains prominence. There will be gains to be had even if you have to turn off Dx11 specific features and go back to Dx10.0 or Dx10.1 where 10.1 might still give you a significant speed advantage.

And you'll always have the option to pick and choose which Dx11 features to enable/disable with a Dx11 card. So in general, you should always have the option for a better looking game.

So in a year, it's possible the 57xx cards will perform even better versus 250 than currently. And not everyone updates their cards every year. I still have many friends with 8800/9800 and 3870 class cards that I keep recommending not to upgrade as their gaming needs don't require anything more powerful.

Regards,
SB
Silent_Buddha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-Mar-2010, 10:28   #28
Svensk Viking
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 424
Default

Isn't it better getting a strong DX10/DX10.1 card then instead of a weaker DX11 card SB?

I mean, what's the point in having one of the weaker DX11 cards if you need to turn off features, or even go back to DX10/10.1 to get good performance?
Svensk Viking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-Mar-2010, 06:08   #29
eastmen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Svensk Viking View Post
Isn't it better getting a strong DX10/DX10.1 card then instead of a weaker DX11 card SB?

I mean, what's the point in having one of the weaker DX11 cards if you need to turn off features, or even go back to DX10/10.1 to get good performance?
the 5750/70 are strong dx 10/.1 cards. The 250gts is only a strong dx 10 card.

The 5750/70 then throws in being a solid dx 11 card to boot.

Not only that but it does it with less power it seems. At this point even if you can only throw on a few dx 11 effects it may be teh smarter card considering that many dx 11 effects seem to boost performance over a dx 10 path.
eastmen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-Mar-2010, 01:43   #30
Silent_Buddha
Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Svensk Viking View Post
Isn't it better getting a strong DX10/DX10.1 card then instead of a weaker DX11 card SB?

I mean, what's the point in having one of the weaker DX11 cards if you need to turn off features, or even go back to DX10/10.1 to get good performance?
Dx10.1 perhaps. But optimizations in 10.1 and 11 can quite possibly erase whatever raw performance advantages a dx10.0 card might have depending on what is implemented.

Additionally CS 5.0 in Dx11 actually increases performance of similar features in Dx10.0. So it's quite possbile that in Dx11 games that a much slower Dx11 card will actually be faster than a Dx10.0 card using the same or better graphical options.

Regards,
SB
Silent_Buddha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Mar-2010, 01:00   #31
Svensk Viking
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 424
Default

But if we said the HD4890 vs the HD5770, would you go for the HD5770?

But I am mostly thinking there are so few games using DX11 right now, so I would rather wait until it has gotten more ground and then get a DX11 card
Svensk Viking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-Mar-2010, 15:40   #32
Dr Evil
Anas platyrhynchos
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eastmen View Post
It al depends . If you have a 250 it should still fetch a good price. The 5770 at the $130 price point with say $70 back from the 250 card would be a smart move.
Paying 60$ to replace GTS 250 for 5770 is a smart move? That trade would put the 5770 as almost twice as expensive than the GTS, and for very little gain. Imo no reason to go through with something like that. I'd get another GTS 250 for 70$ and SLI them.
Dr Evil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-Mar-2010, 03:20   #33
FrameBuffer
Naughty Boy!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by absads View Post
The 5750 is pretty weak - DirectX 11 sounds good and all, but I'm doubtful of that card's abilities to properly run any DirectX 11 games on the market. I can shave a few dollars off the price and at least put you into HD5770 territory.
Link
the 5750 is not THAT weak.. just don't expect to run extremely high resolutions with full AA/AF and effects.. and it's till priced a bit high imo. The 5770 is more than capable and the 5750 is only about 5-15% slower.

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1177/7/

In Dirt2 (DX9) it keeps close with the GTX260.. not bad for a card that ranges from $100-130 vs a card that costs 2X as much.. In DX11 its very playable (>30FPS) at 40fps @ 1920x1080 8X AA.. making for a very affordable and very OC friendly (20%+ Core 15%+ Mem) solution.
__________________
Fermi Paradox*: "The apparent size and age of G300 die suggests that many technologically advanced GPUs ought to exist.
However, this hypothesis seems inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it."


*many thanks to Florin

Last edited by FrameBuffer; 13-Mar-2010 at 03:26.
FrameBuffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-Mar-2010, 20:11   #34
swaaye
Entirely Suboptimal
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WI, USA
Posts: 6,868
Default

Save money, buy high-end card, get big gains, more funz.

Actually, I'd just hold onto GTS 250 and wait till the next infinitely exciting round of new hotness GPUs.

Last edited by swaaye; 14-Mar-2010 at 20:16.
swaaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-Mar-2010, 23:32   #35
Graham
Hello :-)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 1,314
Default

Just a note:

The 'The 5750 is pretty weak' posts deleted from this thread appear to be some form of auto spam. Keep an eye out.

Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-Mar-2010, 12:29   #36
homerdog
hardly a Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: still camping with a mauler
Posts: 3,677
Default

The 5750 is pretty weak
homerdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-Mar-2010, 12:33   #37
Squilliam
Beyond3d isn't defined yet
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
Just a note:

The 'The 5750 is pretty weak' posts deleted from this thread appear to be some form of auto spam. Keep an eye out.

Auto spam? I don't understand! Is it some kind of bot thats trawling the internet to diss the HD 5750?
Squilliam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17-Mar-2010, 18:26   #38
Dr Evil
Anas platyrhynchos
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squilliam View Post
Auto spam? I don't understand! Is it some kind of bot thats trawling the internet to diss the HD 5750?
It had a link to some computer store, suggesting to buy 5770. It was clearly spam.
Dr Evil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-Mar-2010, 21:36   #39
FrameBuffer
Naughty Boy!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 499
Default

ope ya all don't mind but I noticed early this morning that ZZF has a 1GB 5770 on sale for $122.99 and FREE Shipping

http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/Produc...tCode=10012284
ZipZoomfly Part#: 10012284
Manufacturer SKU: AX5770 1GBD5-H
Our Price: $152.99
Mail-in Rebate: $20.00 (Expires 03/31/10)
Final Price: $132.99 after rebate

Enter coupon code ZZF1053 for an additional $10 off brings total to 122.99 (Free S&H)
__________________
Fermi Paradox*: "The apparent size and age of G300 die suggests that many technologically advanced GPUs ought to exist.
However, this hypothesis seems inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it."


*many thanks to Florin
FrameBuffer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.