Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 16-Aug-2003, 22:12   #1
Bolloxoid
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 191
Default So much for Nvidia's internal guidelines

I'll just quote 3DGPU quoting Brian Burke:

Quote:
I spoke with Brian Burke, PR Director for Desktop Products at NVIDIA regarding the UT2003 situation as was told that the drop in trilinear filtering levels does not degrade IQ, and therefore does not violate their new optimization methods.
So, their interpretation of the "leaked" optimisation guidelines is pretty flexible.

Link to the whole editorial:

http://www.3dgpu.com/modules/wfsecti...p?articleid=70
Bolloxoid is offline   Reply With Quote

 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ati's new filtering vs Futuremark's optimization guidelines Mendel 3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices 31 21-May-2004 09:18
Process to Enforce 3DMark® Optimization Guidelines Nick[FM] 3D & Semiconductor Industry 19 04-Nov-2003 12:49
Optimization Guidelines QA Nick[FM] 3D & Semiconductor Industry 59 30-Sep-2003 11:16
Futuremark Driver Optimization Guidelines Dave Baumann Press Releases 8 25-Sep-2003 08:20
[H] and nVidia define optimization guidelines? digitalwanderer 3D & Semiconductor Industry 30 20-Jul-2003 22:04


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.