Beyond3D Forum

CoolAsAMoose · 11-May-2002, 13:15

http://www.the-inquirer.com/11050201.htm

Interesting with the TV-out/DVO card that sits in the AGP slot.

Seems to NOT support DDR333 - at least not officially. According to Toms Hardware it should, and giving really good performance (at least when paired with a GF3 card). Check that here (845G is the "future chipset 1", earlier it really said 845G but I guess Intel forced Tom to change it).

Anyone heard anything about the 3D-performance of 845G? One number I saw was half that of GF2MX400!?!

Tatchan · 11-May-2002, 18:23

yes, very close to mx200

CoolAsAMoose · 11-May-2002, 18:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tatchan

yes, very close to mx200

Hmm, if this is true, the built in graphics of the 845G will basically be useless for the latest/upcoming games - just as what was the case with the 810 chipset. They should have learned something.........

Tatchan · 11-May-2002, 19:14

yes, but still good enough for most business applications...
at least it's better than what sis and via offering, right?

11-May-2002, 13:15	#1
CoolAsAMoose Junior Member Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 42	845G/GL/E info on The Inquirer http://www.the-inquirer.com/11050201.htm Interesting with the TV-out/DVO card that sits in the AGP slot. Seems to NOT support DDR333 - at least not officially. According to Toms Hardware it should, and giving really good performance (at least when paired with a GF3 card). Check that here (845G is the "future chipset 1", earlier it really said 845G but I guess Intel forced Tom to change it). Anyone heard anything about the 3D-performance of 845G? One number I saw was half that of GF2MX400!?!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
I was looking for info about the Xbox 2's specs....	Josh378	Console Technology	2	13-Dec-2004 00:33
Inquirer spreading R420 info	991060	3D Architectures & Chips	228	23-Apr-2004 17:14
catalyst 4.3 fails in 3dmark2001 SE adv. pixel shader test??	Mendel	3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices	9	16-Mar-2004 23:52
Futuremark Announcement Delayed	Nick[FM]	3D & Semiconductor Industry	144	24-Sep-2003 17:15
More next gen ATI info at the Inquirer	McElvis	3D Architectures & Chips	10	02-Jul-2002 21:52

11-May-2002, 18:23	#2
Tatchan Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 36	yes, very close to mx200

11-May-2002, 19:14	#4
Tatchan Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 36	yes, but still good enough for most business applications... at least it's better than what sis and via offering, right?

Beyond3D Forum

Welcome, Unregistered.