If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Read here and here!
![]() Quote:
__________________
Apple: China -- Brutal leadership done right.
Google: United States -- Somewhat democratic. Microsoft: Russia -- Big and bloated. Linux: EU -- Diverse and broke. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Entirely Suboptimal
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WI, USA
Posts: 6,867
|
Oh dear it's the Pentium D style of dual core. No amazingly huge shared L2 cache that can be awesome in single threaded apps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,806
|
How does the Atom compare to the ARM processors in performance and power consumption?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
French frog
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: France
Posts: 4,259
|
In perf per Watt I would say badly.
__________________
What's trying to be a bunch of presentations Sebbbi about virtual texturing Blessed is Leatrix Latency Fix |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Darlek ******
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,663
|
i do know that a Sempron 64 LE-1100 1.90 GHz is 43% faster than a Atom 230 – 1.60 GHz (thats a single core)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Entirely Suboptimal
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WI, USA
Posts: 6,867
|
Yeah but remember that Atom is a ~2W CPU (at load) usually. Nothing else that's x86 can touch that. Though I'm not sure if 2W is low enough to be useful in Arm/MIPS style embedded apps. Those chips usually aren't as well endowed as Atom though (FPU, L2 cache, SIMD, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...nt,1997-5.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
945 is only the netbook/nettop chipset, embedded applications use a lower power chipset.
__________________
<tuan> maybe they're developing a Physics-to-CPU layer, an API layer for direct access to CPU cores for physics? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,177
|
Intel Officially Shipping Dual-core Atom
Quote:
__________________
God put me on earth to do a certain number of things. Right now i'm so far behind that i'll never die. Random 512Kb onboard -> S3 Virge 4MB -> RivaTNT2 -> GeforcePro -> GF3 -> NV3x -> R420 -> R580 -> G80 -> G92 -> 5870 -> ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 4,223
|
weird that Intel is using a low clocked pentium M core in their coming SoC for embedded/low footprint server use (the SoC with VGA, three ethernet controllers etc.).
They badly want the Atom perceived to be sucky |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|