Welcome, Unregistered.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
Old 08-Sep-2008, 17:01   #1
fellix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Varna, Bulgaria
Posts: 2,832
Send a message via Skype™ to fellix
Intel Dual-core Atom snapped

Read here and here!



Quote:
Processor Arithmetic Test
Intel Atom N270 1.6GHz – 8291 kpixels/s
Intel Atom 330 1.6GHz Dual Core – 16920 kpixels/s
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 1.3GHz – 24742 kpixels/s

Memory Bandwidth Test
Intel Atom N270 1.6GHz – 3.54 GB/s
Intel Atom 330 1.6GHz Dual Core – 7.18 GB/s
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 1.3GHz – 9.53 GB/s
__________________
Apple: China -- Brutal leadership done right.
Google: United States -- Somewhat democratic.
Microsoft: Russia -- Big and bloated.
Linux: EU -- Diverse and broke.
fellix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-Sep-2008, 20:29   #2
swaaye
Entirely Suboptimal
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WI, USA
Posts: 6,867
Default

Oh dear it's the Pentium D style of dual core. No amazingly huge shared L2 cache that can be awesome in single threaded apps.
swaaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2008, 07:52   #3
RudeCurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,806
Default

How does the Atom compare to the ARM processors in performance and power consumption?
RudeCurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2008, 12:07   #4
liolio
French frog
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: France
Posts: 4,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RudeCurve View Post
How does the Atom compare to the ARM processors in performance and power consumption?
In perf per Watt I would say badly.
liolio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2008, 12:14   #5
Davros
Darlek ******
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,663
Default

i do know that a Sempron 64 LE-1100 1.90 GHz is 43% faster than a Atom 230 – 1.60 GHz (thats a single core)
Davros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2008, 19:40   #6
swaaye
Entirely Suboptimal
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WI, USA
Posts: 6,867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davros View Post
i do know that a Sempron 64 LE-1100 1.90 GHz is 43% faster than a Atom 230 – 1.60 GHz (thats a single core)
Yeah but remember that Atom is a ~2W CPU (at load) usually. Nothing else that's x86 can touch that. Though I'm not sure if 2W is low enough to be useful in Arm/MIPS style embedded apps. Those chips usually aren't as well endowed as Atom though (FPU, L2 cache, SIMD, etc.)
swaaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2008, 21:18   #7
Tokelil
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 329
Send a message via ICQ to Tokelil Send a message via MSN to Tokelil
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swaaye View Post
Yeah but remember that Atom is a ~2W CPU (at load) usually. Nothing else that's x86 can touch that. Though I'm not sure if 2W is low enough to be useful in Arm/MIPS style embedded apps. Those chips usually aren't as well endowed as Atom though (FPU, L2 cache, SIMD, etc.)
As long as they bundle it with 945 chipset etc. it doesn't matter though. The power requirements for the whole system doesn't look good for ATOM.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...nt,1997-5.html
Tokelil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Sep-2008, 08:23   #8
Thorburn
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blazkowicz View Post
weird that Intel is using a low clocked pentium M core in their coming SoC for embedded/low footprint server use (the SoC with VGA, three ethernet controllers etc.).
They badly want the Atom perceived to be sucky
I think future versions are Atom based. I'd guess Atom wasn't ready in time nor built on the correct process node to make it into the initial design.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokelil View Post
As long as they bundle it with 945 chipset etc. it doesn't matter though. The power requirements for the whole system doesn't look good for ATOM.
945 is only the netbook/nettop chipset, embedded applications use a lower power chipset.
__________________
<tuan> maybe they're developing a Physics-to-CPU layer, an API layer for direct access to CPU cores for physics?
Thorburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Sep-2008, 19:59   #9
Unknown Soldier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,177
Default

Intel Officially Shipping Dual-core Atom

Quote:
Dual-core Atom may ease shortages of Atom parts in the channel

Intel is dominating the world of the netbook with its Atom single core processor. The processor running at 1.6GHz powers the vast majority of netbooks that are available to purchase right now. The tiny chip is perfect for the netbook market thanks to its low cost and low power requirements.

It's no secret that Intel is bringing new Atom processors to market for the low-cost computer segment. Intel announced via its Chip Shots blog that its dual-core Atom processor is now shipping. The part is known as the Intel Atom Processor 330. The dual-core processor cores run at 1.6GHz and have 1MB of L2 cache.

The processor has an 8W TDP and supports DDR2 667 RAM. Intel says that the new Atom is available as an integrated package and has been validated with the Intel 945GC Express chipset. The chipset features integrated Graphics Media Accelerator 950 and Intel High Definition Audio.

Microsoft has eased the restriction for manufacturers using Windows XP on netbooks to allow for larger screen sizes and more storage. However, the new more lenient restrictions form Microsoft still don’t allow for manufacturers of netbooks to use dual-core processors. That should mean that netbooks using the new dual-core Atom processor would be running some version of Linux and perhaps Windows Vista of some flavor.

DailyTech reported in mid-August that Intel was going to be releasing its dual-core Atom in September and Intel slid the processor in mere days before the end of the month. Intel is still having shortages of its single-core Atom processors in the channel. The shortage has led some makers like Asus to use older Celeron M processors.

Early in September, DailyTech reported that Intel has its next generation Atom on the roadmap for Q3 2009. The next generation Atom processor will be most notable for its integrated graphics processor.
http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Offic...ticle13016.htm
__________________
God put me on earth to do a certain number of things. Right now i'm so far behind that i'll never die.

Random 512Kb onboard -> S3 Virge 4MB -> RivaTNT2 -> GeforcePro -> GF3 -> NV3x -> R420 -> R580 -> G80 -> G92 -> 5870 -> ???
Unknown Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-Sep-2008, 20:24   #10
Blazkowicz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 4,223
Default

weird that Intel is using a low clocked pentium M core in their coming SoC for embedded/low footprint server use (the SoC with VGA, three ethernet controllers etc.).
They badly want the Atom perceived to be sucky
Blazkowicz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.